The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries

The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks wear when it comes to many measures of blue blood salubrity care, a new report concludes. Despite having the costliest vigour care system in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, high-mindedness and the ability of its citizens to lead long, healthy, dynamic lives, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based private cellar focused on improving health care. "On many measures of health system performance, the US has a hanker way to go to perform as well as other countries that spend far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matutinal teleconference.

And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that regardless of our significant investment in health care, the US continues to lag behind other countries". However, Davis believes rejuvenated health care reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a elongate way to improving the current system. "Our hope and expectation is that when the measure is fully enacted, we will match and even exceed the performance of other countries".

The report compares the performance of the American vigorousness care system with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 facts included in the report, the US spends the most on health care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the bulk spent in Canada and nearly three times the compute of New Zealand, which spends the least.

The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked robustness care system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks most recent or next to last in all categories and scored "particularly inexpertly on measures of access, efficiency, equity and long, healthy and productive lives".

The US ranks in the mid-point of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care. Overall, the Netherlands came in first on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh.

Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, major failing president at the Commonwealth Fund, pointed out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with hardened conditions had been given the wrong medication or the wrong dose. That's twice the indiscretion rate observed in Germany and the Netherlands.

So "Adults in the United States also reported delays in being notified about oddball test results or given the wrong results at relatively high rates. Indeed, the rates were three times higher than in Germany and the Netherlands. As a outcome we base last in safety and do poorly on several dimensions of quality".

In addition, many Americans are still going without medical trouble oneself because of cost. "We also do surprisingly poorly on access to primary care and access to after hours suffering given our overall resources and spending". In fact, 54 percent of people with chronic conditions reported prevailing without needed care in 2008, compared with 13 percent in Great Britain and 7 percent in the Netherlands.

The United States also ranked aftermost in efficiency. There are too many duplicate tests, too much paperwork, huge administrative costs and too many patients using emergency rooms as doctor's offices. In addition, paucity appears to be a big factor in whether Americans have access to care, the report found.

The United States also performed worst in terms of the host of people who die early, in levels of infant mortality, and for robust life expectancy among older adults.

Dr David Katz, the man of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine, commented that "as a doctor and public health practitioner, I have routinely spoken out in favor of health care fix in the US The responses evoked have not always been kind. Prominent among the counterarguments has been: 'You should consort with what health care is like in other countries'".

So "This report utterly belies the idea that the former status quo for health care delivery in the US was as good as it gets. Others have been doing better and we can, and should, too". However, at least one adept doesn't believe that health dolour reform, as it now stands, will solve these problems.

Dr Steffie Woolhandler, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program, said that "the US has the worst strength keeping system among the seven countries studied, and arguably the worst in the developed world viagra tablet ke bare me batay. Unfortunately, the US will almost certainly proceed in last place, since the recently passed salubriousness reform will leave 23 million Americans without coverage while enlarging the role of the private indemnity industry, which obstructs care and drives up costs".