Diseases Of The Digestive Organs Is Increased In Children And Adolescents.
Eating disorders have risen steadily in children and teens over the model few decades, with some of the sharpest increases occurring in boys and minority youths, according to a further report. In one frightening statistic cited in the report, an opinion by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality found that hospitalizations for eating disorders jumped by 119 percent between 1999 and 2006 for younger than 12 kids. At the same interval as inexorable cases of anorexia and bulimia have risen, so too have "partial-syndrome" eating disorders - sophomoric people who have some, but not all, of the symptoms of an eating disorder.
Athletes, including gymnasts and wrestlers, and performers, including dancers and models, may be strikingly at risk, according to the report. "We are seeing a lot more eating disorders than we worn to and we are seeing it in people we didn't associate with eating disorders in the past - a lot of boys, negligible kids, people of color and those with lower socioeconomic backgrounds," said bang author Dr David Rosen, a professor of pediatrics, internal medicine and psychiatry at University of Michigan. "The stereotype steadfast is of an affluent white girl of a certain age. We wanted nation to understand eating disorders are equal-opportunity disorders".
The report is published in the December dissemination of Pediatrics. While an estimated 0,5 percent of adolescent girls in the United States have anorexia and about 1 to 2 percent have bulimia, experts viewpoint that between 0,8 to 14 percent of Americans in a general way have at least some of the physical and psychological symptoms of an eating disorder, according to the report.
Boys now symbolize about 5 to 10 percent of those with eating disorders, although some research suggests that number may be even higher, said Lisa Lilenfeld, entering president of the Eating Disorders Coalition for Research, Policy and Action in Washington, DC. Most studies that have been focused on pervasiveness were based on patients in treatment centers, who tended to be pale-complexioned females. "That does not represent all of those who are suffering. It's hard to say if eating disorders are on the wax in males, or if we're just doing a better job of detecting it".
Rosen and his colleagues pored over more than 200 late studies on eating disorders. While much is unknown about what triggers these conditions, experts now gather it takes more than media images of very thin women, although that's not to say those don't play a role.
Like other screwy health problems and addictions, ranging from depression to anxiety disorder to alcoholism, division and twin studies have shown that eating disorders can run in families, indicating there's a strong genetic component. "We in use to think eating disorders were the consequences of bad family dynamics, that the media caused eating disorders or that individuals who had decided personality traits got eating disorders. All of those can pit oneself against a role, but it's just not that simple.
Showing posts with label report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label report. Show all posts
Wednesday, 4 December 2019
Monday, 30 April 2018
Americans Are Increasingly Abusing Painkillers
Americans Are Increasingly Abusing Painkillers.
Rehab admissions akin to alcohol, opiates (including remedy painkillers) and marijuana increased in the United States between 1999 and 2009, according to a novel national report. However, fewer people sought treatment for problems with cocaine and methamphetamine or amphetamines, the researchers noted. One of the most staggering increases over the 10-year swat period: opiate admissions, mostly due to use of medicament opioids, which include painkillers such as oxycodone (Oxycontin) or Vicodin (hydrocodone).
The findings showed that 96 percent of the nearly 2 million admissions to curing facilities that occurred in 2009 were kindred to alcohol (42 percent), opiates (21 percent), marijuana (18 percent), cocaine (9 percent) and methamphetamine/amphetamines (6 percent). The promulgate from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) identified trends in the reasons why settle are admitted to gravamen abuse treatment facilities.
The SAMHSA report revealed that prescription drugs were to criticism for 33 percent of opiate rehab admissions in 2009 - up from just 8 percent a decade earlier. Alcohol tongue-lashing also remains a serious problem. It was the number one mind for substance abuse treatment among all major ethnic and racial groups, except Puerto Ricans, according to the report.
Rehab admissions akin to alcohol, opiates (including remedy painkillers) and marijuana increased in the United States between 1999 and 2009, according to a novel national report. However, fewer people sought treatment for problems with cocaine and methamphetamine or amphetamines, the researchers noted. One of the most staggering increases over the 10-year swat period: opiate admissions, mostly due to use of medicament opioids, which include painkillers such as oxycodone (Oxycontin) or Vicodin (hydrocodone).
The findings showed that 96 percent of the nearly 2 million admissions to curing facilities that occurred in 2009 were kindred to alcohol (42 percent), opiates (21 percent), marijuana (18 percent), cocaine (9 percent) and methamphetamine/amphetamines (6 percent). The promulgate from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) identified trends in the reasons why settle are admitted to gravamen abuse treatment facilities.
The SAMHSA report revealed that prescription drugs were to criticism for 33 percent of opiate rehab admissions in 2009 - up from just 8 percent a decade earlier. Alcohol tongue-lashing also remains a serious problem. It was the number one mind for substance abuse treatment among all major ethnic and racial groups, except Puerto Ricans, according to the report.
Monday, 5 March 2018
The Main Cause Of Accidents In The USA Is Drowsy Drivers
The Main Cause Of Accidents In The USA Is Drowsy Drivers.
Driving torpid is a chief factor in traffic accidents and deaths in the United States, federal robustness officials reported Thursday. Federal statistics state that 2,5 percent of murderous motor vehicle crashes and 2 percent of crashes with non-fatal injuries comprise drowsy driving. But, data gathering methods make it difficult to guestimate the actual number of accidents that involve drowsy drivers. In fact, some studies have estimated that between 15 percent and 33 percent of baneful crashes may involve sleepy drivers.
And deaths and injuries are more favoured in motor vehicle crashes that involve drowsy driving, the report stated. According to the gunfire by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 4 percent of drivers quizzed said they had driven while weary in the month before the survey. "One out of 25 people reported falling asleep while driving in the over month," said CDC epidemiologist Anne Wheaton, the report's model author. "If you think of how many cars you see every day, one out of 25 - that's a musical big number".
And those numbers may underestimate the scope of the problem. "These were people who realized they had fallen asleep while they were driving. If you tumble asleep for even a moment you may not realize it - so that's not even taking those grass roots into account".
Driving torpid is a chief factor in traffic accidents and deaths in the United States, federal robustness officials reported Thursday. Federal statistics state that 2,5 percent of murderous motor vehicle crashes and 2 percent of crashes with non-fatal injuries comprise drowsy driving. But, data gathering methods make it difficult to guestimate the actual number of accidents that involve drowsy drivers. In fact, some studies have estimated that between 15 percent and 33 percent of baneful crashes may involve sleepy drivers.
And deaths and injuries are more favoured in motor vehicle crashes that involve drowsy driving, the report stated. According to the gunfire by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 4 percent of drivers quizzed said they had driven while weary in the month before the survey. "One out of 25 people reported falling asleep while driving in the over month," said CDC epidemiologist Anne Wheaton, the report's model author. "If you think of how many cars you see every day, one out of 25 - that's a musical big number".
And those numbers may underestimate the scope of the problem. "These were people who realized they had fallen asleep while they were driving. If you tumble asleep for even a moment you may not realize it - so that's not even taking those grass roots into account".
Monday, 5 February 2018
2010 Report On Child Health Of America Gives Different Conclusions
2010 Report On Child Health Of America Gives Different Conclusions.
In an annual come in gauging the form and well-being of America's children, a society of 22 federal agencies reports progress in some areas, preterm births and teen pregnancies in particular, but spoilt news in other areas, like the number of teens living in poverty. "This boom is a status update on how our nation's children are faring, and it represents large segments of the population," Dr Alan E Guttmacher, acting headman of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said during a iron conference.
The report, titled America's Children In Brief: Key Indicators of Well-Being, 2010, was released July 9, 2010. According to the report, in 2009 there were 74,5 million individuals under 18 years of epoch living in the United States. That troop is up 2 million since 2000. Seventy percent of those children lived in households with two parents, while 26 percent lived with just one parent. Four percent of the nation's children white-hot without either parent.
One of the most pontifical findings from the study was a stop in the rate of preterm births. "There was a decline in the number of preterm births, and the decline was seen in each of the three largest tribal and ethnic groups," said Edward Sondik, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics, during the mob conference.
The preterm extraction rate - babies born before 37 weeks of gestation - dropped from 12,7 percent in 2007 to 12,3 percent in 2008. This is the wink straight decline after years of steadily increasing rates of preterm birth, according to the report.
According to Sondik, "the etiology of preterm origination is completely complex and it's hard to know for sure which factors are responsible for this dip". Dr Diane Ashton, envoy medical director for the March of Dimes, said some enquiry suggests that a reduction in the number of elective Cesarean births done before 39 weeks of gestation may be at least part of the reason that preterm birth rates are going down.
In an annual come in gauging the form and well-being of America's children, a society of 22 federal agencies reports progress in some areas, preterm births and teen pregnancies in particular, but spoilt news in other areas, like the number of teens living in poverty. "This boom is a status update on how our nation's children are faring, and it represents large segments of the population," Dr Alan E Guttmacher, acting headman of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said during a iron conference.
The report, titled America's Children In Brief: Key Indicators of Well-Being, 2010, was released July 9, 2010. According to the report, in 2009 there were 74,5 million individuals under 18 years of epoch living in the United States. That troop is up 2 million since 2000. Seventy percent of those children lived in households with two parents, while 26 percent lived with just one parent. Four percent of the nation's children white-hot without either parent.
One of the most pontifical findings from the study was a stop in the rate of preterm births. "There was a decline in the number of preterm births, and the decline was seen in each of the three largest tribal and ethnic groups," said Edward Sondik, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics, during the mob conference.
The preterm extraction rate - babies born before 37 weeks of gestation - dropped from 12,7 percent in 2007 to 12,3 percent in 2008. This is the wink straight decline after years of steadily increasing rates of preterm birth, according to the report.
According to Sondik, "the etiology of preterm origination is completely complex and it's hard to know for sure which factors are responsible for this dip". Dr Diane Ashton, envoy medical director for the March of Dimes, said some enquiry suggests that a reduction in the number of elective Cesarean births done before 39 weeks of gestation may be at least part of the reason that preterm birth rates are going down.
Sunday, 7 January 2018
Many Supplements Contain Toxins That Are Not Claimed In The Description
Many Supplements Contain Toxins That Are Not Claimed In The Description.
A Congressional exploration of dietary herbal supplements has found intimation amounts of lead, mercury and other encumbered metals in nearly all products tested, plus myriad illegal fettle claims made by supplement manufacturers, The New York Times reported Wednesday, 27 May. The levels of critical metal contaminants did not exceed established limits, but investigators also discovered troubling and perhaps unacceptable levels of pesticide residue in 16 of 40 supplements, the newspaper said. One ginkgo biloba fallout had labeling claiming it could to Alzheimer's disease (no effective treatment yet exists), while a product containing ginseng asserted that it can enjoin both diabetes and cancer, the report said.
Steve Mister, president of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a following group that represents the dietary supplement industry, said it was not surprising that herbal supplements contained drop amounts of heavy metals, because they are routinely found in soil and plants. "I dont believe this should be of concern to consumers," he told the Times. The report findings were to be presented to the Senate on Wednesday, two weeks before chat begins on a major food safety bill that will likely village more controls on food manufacturers, the Times said.
The newspaper said it was given the report in advance of the Senate hearing. How durable the bill will be on supplement makers has been the subject of much lobbying, but the Times celebrated that some Congressional staff members doubt manufacturers will find it too burdensome.
A Congressional exploration of dietary herbal supplements has found intimation amounts of lead, mercury and other encumbered metals in nearly all products tested, plus myriad illegal fettle claims made by supplement manufacturers, The New York Times reported Wednesday, 27 May. The levels of critical metal contaminants did not exceed established limits, but investigators also discovered troubling and perhaps unacceptable levels of pesticide residue in 16 of 40 supplements, the newspaper said. One ginkgo biloba fallout had labeling claiming it could to Alzheimer's disease (no effective treatment yet exists), while a product containing ginseng asserted that it can enjoin both diabetes and cancer, the report said.
Steve Mister, president of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a following group that represents the dietary supplement industry, said it was not surprising that herbal supplements contained drop amounts of heavy metals, because they are routinely found in soil and plants. "I dont believe this should be of concern to consumers," he told the Times. The report findings were to be presented to the Senate on Wednesday, two weeks before chat begins on a major food safety bill that will likely village more controls on food manufacturers, the Times said.
The newspaper said it was given the report in advance of the Senate hearing. How durable the bill will be on supplement makers has been the subject of much lobbying, but the Times celebrated that some Congressional staff members doubt manufacturers will find it too burdensome.
Thursday, 7 December 2017
A Used Breast Pump Can Carry Infectious Diseases
A Used Breast Pump Can Carry Infectious Diseases.
Women who are breast-feeding should take possession of precautions when deciding what category of breast pump to use, particularly if they are all in all buying or renting a used or second-hand pump, according to a new report, which was released Jan 15, 2013 from the US Food and Drug Administration. Although core pumps can range from single, vade-mecum pumps to double, electric-powered models, all have a few basic parts, including a breast defend that fits over the nipple, a pump that creates a vacuum to express the milk and a detachable container for collecting the milk, Kathryn Daws-Kopp, an FDA electrical engineer, said in the report. The FDA oversees the safe keeping and effectiveness of these devices.
Although women can corrupt breast pumps, many hospitals, medical stock stores and lactation consultants rent breast pumps that can be used by multiple women. The FDA advised all women who use rented or hand-me-down pumps to buy an accessory trappings with new breast shields and tubing - even if the existing kit looks clean. Potentially catching particles may linger in a breast pump or its accessories for a long time after a woman finishes using it.
These germs can infect the babe in arms or the next woman who uses that pump, said Dr Michael Cummings, an obstetrician and gynecologist with the FDA. The report, published on the Consumer Updates summon of the FDA's website, offers the following tips to insure that a breast pump is clean. Rinse each subordinate that comes into contact with breast milk in cool water immediately after pumping.
Wash each accessory independently using liquid dishwashing soap and warm water, and rinse each piece in hot water for 10 to 15 seconds. Allow each adventitious to air-dry completely on a clean towel or drying rack. The FDA popular that women who rent breast pumps should request that all parts of their push be cleaned, disinfected and sterilized according to the manufacturer's directions.
Women who are breast-feeding should take possession of precautions when deciding what category of breast pump to use, particularly if they are all in all buying or renting a used or second-hand pump, according to a new report, which was released Jan 15, 2013 from the US Food and Drug Administration. Although core pumps can range from single, vade-mecum pumps to double, electric-powered models, all have a few basic parts, including a breast defend that fits over the nipple, a pump that creates a vacuum to express the milk and a detachable container for collecting the milk, Kathryn Daws-Kopp, an FDA electrical engineer, said in the report. The FDA oversees the safe keeping and effectiveness of these devices.
Although women can corrupt breast pumps, many hospitals, medical stock stores and lactation consultants rent breast pumps that can be used by multiple women. The FDA advised all women who use rented or hand-me-down pumps to buy an accessory trappings with new breast shields and tubing - even if the existing kit looks clean. Potentially catching particles may linger in a breast pump or its accessories for a long time after a woman finishes using it.
These germs can infect the babe in arms or the next woman who uses that pump, said Dr Michael Cummings, an obstetrician and gynecologist with the FDA. The report, published on the Consumer Updates summon of the FDA's website, offers the following tips to insure that a breast pump is clean. Rinse each subordinate that comes into contact with breast milk in cool water immediately after pumping.
Wash each accessory independently using liquid dishwashing soap and warm water, and rinse each piece in hot water for 10 to 15 seconds. Allow each adventitious to air-dry completely on a clean towel or drying rack. The FDA popular that women who rent breast pumps should request that all parts of their push be cleaned, disinfected and sterilized according to the manufacturer's directions.
Tuesday, 1 August 2017
American Children Receive 24 Vaccines Before The Age Of 2
American Children Receive 24 Vaccines Before The Age Of 2.
The established vaccine record for young children in the United States is harmless and effective, a new review says. The report, issued Wednesday by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) at the beg of the US Department of Health and Human Services, is the first to look at the unimpaired vaccine schedule as opposed to just individual vaccines. The current vaccine schedule entails 24 vaccines given before the length of existence of 2, averaging one to five shots during a single doctor visit.
So "The body found no evidence that the childhood immunization schedule is not safe," said Ada Sue Hinshaw, bench of the committee that produced the report and dean of the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, MD. "The averment repeatedly points to the healthfulness benefits of the schedule, including preventing children and their communities from life-threatening diseases," added Hinshaw, who spoke at a Wednesday announcement conference to introduce the report.
The series of vaccines are designed to mind against a range of diseases, including measles, mumps, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, meningitis and hepatitis. However, some expressed reservations about the report.
And "The IOM Committee has done a shapely operation outlining core parental concerns about the safety of the US child vaccine plan and identifying the large knowledge gaps that cause parents to continue to ask doctors questions they can't answer," said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a nonprofit organizing "advocating for the formation of vaccine safety and versed consent protections in the public health system". But "The most shocking part of this shot is that the committee could only identify fewer than 40 studies published in the past 10 years that addressed the ongoing 0-6-year-old child vaccine schedule.
The established vaccine record for young children in the United States is harmless and effective, a new review says. The report, issued Wednesday by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) at the beg of the US Department of Health and Human Services, is the first to look at the unimpaired vaccine schedule as opposed to just individual vaccines. The current vaccine schedule entails 24 vaccines given before the length of existence of 2, averaging one to five shots during a single doctor visit.
So "The body found no evidence that the childhood immunization schedule is not safe," said Ada Sue Hinshaw, bench of the committee that produced the report and dean of the Graduate School of Nursing at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, MD. "The averment repeatedly points to the healthfulness benefits of the schedule, including preventing children and their communities from life-threatening diseases," added Hinshaw, who spoke at a Wednesday announcement conference to introduce the report.
The series of vaccines are designed to mind against a range of diseases, including measles, mumps, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, meningitis and hepatitis. However, some expressed reservations about the report.
And "The IOM Committee has done a shapely operation outlining core parental concerns about the safety of the US child vaccine plan and identifying the large knowledge gaps that cause parents to continue to ask doctors questions they can't answer," said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a nonprofit organizing "advocating for the formation of vaccine safety and versed consent protections in the public health system". But "The most shocking part of this shot is that the committee could only identify fewer than 40 studies published in the past 10 years that addressed the ongoing 0-6-year-old child vaccine schedule.
Tuesday, 13 June 2017
People Living In The United States Die Earlier Than In Japan And Australia
People Living In The United States Die Earlier Than In Japan And Australia.
The United States is falling behind 16 other affluent nations in terms of the condition and security of its populace, and even younger Americans are not spared this sobering fact. According to a untrodden report, citizenry living in the United States die sooner, get sicker and carry more injuries than those in other high-income countries, such as Japan and Australia. Even younger Americans with haleness insurance are prone to injuries and ill health, according to the report, released Wednesday by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine.
So "The salubrity of Americans is far worse than those of people in other countries, regard for the fact that we spend more on health care ," said Dr Steven Woolf, a professor of forebears medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond and chair of the panel that wrote the report. Compared to 16 other well-off nations in Europe and elsewhere, the United States occupies the bottom or near-bottom rung of the ladder in a copy of well-being areas, including infant mortality and low nativity rate, injury and homicide rates, teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections including HIV, drug-related deaths, chubbiness and its complement conditions diabetes and heart disease, long-standing lung disease and disability.
Americans are seven times more likely to die of homicides and 20 times more disposed to to die from shootings than their peers in comparable countries. The disadvantages extend across the benevolent life span, from babies (premature birth rates in the United States are on a standing with that of sub-Saharan Africa) to the age of 75.
They also extend beyond the poor and minorities. "Even Americans who are white, insured, have college indoctrination or high income or are engaged in healthy behaviors seem to be in poorer constitution than people with similar characteristics in other nations," said Woolf, who spoke at a Wednesday news conference.
The United States is falling behind 16 other affluent nations in terms of the condition and security of its populace, and even younger Americans are not spared this sobering fact. According to a untrodden report, citizenry living in the United States die sooner, get sicker and carry more injuries than those in other high-income countries, such as Japan and Australia. Even younger Americans with haleness insurance are prone to injuries and ill health, according to the report, released Wednesday by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine.
So "The salubrity of Americans is far worse than those of people in other countries, regard for the fact that we spend more on health care ," said Dr Steven Woolf, a professor of forebears medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond and chair of the panel that wrote the report. Compared to 16 other well-off nations in Europe and elsewhere, the United States occupies the bottom or near-bottom rung of the ladder in a copy of well-being areas, including infant mortality and low nativity rate, injury and homicide rates, teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections including HIV, drug-related deaths, chubbiness and its complement conditions diabetes and heart disease, long-standing lung disease and disability.
Americans are seven times more likely to die of homicides and 20 times more disposed to to die from shootings than their peers in comparable countries. The disadvantages extend across the benevolent life span, from babies (premature birth rates in the United States are on a standing with that of sub-Saharan Africa) to the age of 75.
They also extend beyond the poor and minorities. "Even Americans who are white, insured, have college indoctrination or high income or are engaged in healthy behaviors seem to be in poorer constitution than people with similar characteristics in other nations," said Woolf, who spoke at a Wednesday news conference.
Monday, 8 May 2017
Fatal Case Of Black Plague In The USA
Fatal Case Of Black Plague In The USA.
In 2009, a 60-year-old American lab researcher was mysteriously, and fatally, infected with the blacklist torture while conducting experiments using a weakened, non-virulent tear of the microbe. Now, a follow-up investigation has confirmed that the researcher died because of a genetic predisposition that made him powerless to the hazards of such bacterial contact. The green report appears to set aside fears that the strain of plague in question (known by its regulated name as "Yersinia pestis") had unpredictably mutated into a more lethal one that might have circumvented standard research lab insurance measures.
And "This was a very isolated incident," said study co-author Dr Karen Frank, gaffer of clinical microbiology and immunology laboratories in the department of pathology at the University of Chicago Medical Center. "But the weighty point is that all levels of public health were mobilized to examine this case as soon as it occurred. "And what we now know is that, despite concerns that we might have had a non-virulent strain of virus that unexpectedly modified and became virulent, that is not what happened.
This was an exemplar of a person with a specific genetic condition that caused him to be markedly susceptible to infection. And what that means is that the precautions that are typically taken for handling this type of a-virulent theme in a lab setting are safe and sufficient". Frank and her UC colleague, Dr Olaf Schneewind, reported on the specimen in the June 30 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
According to the National Institutes of Health, prairie dogs, rats and other rodents, and the fleas that nosh them, are the guide carriers of the bacteria responsible for the spread of the deadly plague, and they can infect people through bites. In the 1300s, the misdesignated "Black Death" claimed the lives of more than 30 million Europeans (about one-third of the continent's compute population at the time). In the 1800s, 12 million Chinese died from the illness.
Today, only 10 to 20 Americans are infected yearly. As original reported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Feb 25, 2011, the state of the American lab researcher began in September 2009, when he sought sadness at a hospital pinch room following several days of breathing difficulties, dry coughing, fevers, chills, and weakness. Thirteen hours after admission, he was dead.
In 2009, a 60-year-old American lab researcher was mysteriously, and fatally, infected with the blacklist torture while conducting experiments using a weakened, non-virulent tear of the microbe. Now, a follow-up investigation has confirmed that the researcher died because of a genetic predisposition that made him powerless to the hazards of such bacterial contact. The green report appears to set aside fears that the strain of plague in question (known by its regulated name as "Yersinia pestis") had unpredictably mutated into a more lethal one that might have circumvented standard research lab insurance measures.
And "This was a very isolated incident," said study co-author Dr Karen Frank, gaffer of clinical microbiology and immunology laboratories in the department of pathology at the University of Chicago Medical Center. "But the weighty point is that all levels of public health were mobilized to examine this case as soon as it occurred. "And what we now know is that, despite concerns that we might have had a non-virulent strain of virus that unexpectedly modified and became virulent, that is not what happened.
This was an exemplar of a person with a specific genetic condition that caused him to be markedly susceptible to infection. And what that means is that the precautions that are typically taken for handling this type of a-virulent theme in a lab setting are safe and sufficient". Frank and her UC colleague, Dr Olaf Schneewind, reported on the specimen in the June 30 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.
According to the National Institutes of Health, prairie dogs, rats and other rodents, and the fleas that nosh them, are the guide carriers of the bacteria responsible for the spread of the deadly plague, and they can infect people through bites. In the 1300s, the misdesignated "Black Death" claimed the lives of more than 30 million Europeans (about one-third of the continent's compute population at the time). In the 1800s, 12 million Chinese died from the illness.
Today, only 10 to 20 Americans are infected yearly. As original reported by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Feb 25, 2011, the state of the American lab researcher began in September 2009, when he sought sadness at a hospital pinch room following several days of breathing difficulties, dry coughing, fevers, chills, and weakness. Thirteen hours after admission, he was dead.
Friday, 10 March 2017
The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries
The United States Ranks Last Compared With The Six Other Industrialized Countries.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks wear when it comes to many measures of blue blood salubrity care, a new report concludes. Despite having the costliest vigour care system in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, high-mindedness and the ability of its citizens to lead long, healthy, dynamic lives, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based private cellar focused on improving health care. "On many measures of health system performance, the US has a hanker way to go to perform as well as other countries that spend far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matutinal teleconference.
And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that regardless of our significant investment in health care, the US continues to lag behind other countries". However, Davis believes rejuvenated health care reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a elongate way to improving the current system. "Our hope and expectation is that when the measure is fully enacted, we will match and even exceed the performance of other countries".
The report compares the performance of the American vigorousness care system with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 facts included in the report, the US spends the most on health care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the bulk spent in Canada and nearly three times the compute of New Zealand, which spends the least.
The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked robustness care system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks most recent or next to last in all categories and scored "particularly inexpertly on measures of access, efficiency, equity and long, healthy and productive lives".
The US ranks in the mid-point of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care. Overall, the Netherlands came in first on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh.
Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, major failing president at the Commonwealth Fund, pointed out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with hardened conditions had been given the wrong medication or the wrong dose. That's twice the indiscretion rate observed in Germany and the Netherlands.
Compared with six other industrialized nations, the United States ranks wear when it comes to many measures of blue blood salubrity care, a new report concludes. Despite having the costliest vigour care system in the world, the United States is last or next-to-last in quality, efficiency, access to care, high-mindedness and the ability of its citizens to lead long, healthy, dynamic lives, according to a new report from the Commonwealth Fund, a Washington, DC-based private cellar focused on improving health care. "On many measures of health system performance, the US has a hanker way to go to perform as well as other countries that spend far less than we do on healthcare, yet cover everyone," the Commonwealth Fund's president, Karen Davis, said during a Tuesday matutinal teleconference.
And "It is disappointing, but not surprising, that regardless of our significant investment in health care, the US continues to lag behind other countries". However, Davis believes rejuvenated health care reform legislation - when fully enacted in 2014 - will go a elongate way to improving the current system. "Our hope and expectation is that when the measure is fully enacted, we will match and even exceed the performance of other countries".
The report compares the performance of the American vigorousness care system with those of Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. According to 2007 facts included in the report, the US spends the most on health care, at $7,290 per capita per year. That's almost twice the bulk spent in Canada and nearly three times the compute of New Zealand, which spends the least.
The Netherlands, which has the highest-ranked robustness care system on the Commonwealth Fund list, spends only $3,837 per capita. Despite higher spending, the US ranks most recent or next to last in all categories and scored "particularly inexpertly on measures of access, efficiency, equity and long, healthy and productive lives".
The US ranks in the mid-point of the pack in measures of effective and patient-centered care. Overall, the Netherlands came in first on the list, followed by the United Kingdom and Australia. Canada and the United States ranked sixth and seventh.
Speaking at the teleconference, Cathy Schoen, major failing president at the Commonwealth Fund, pointed out that in 2008, 14 percent of US patients with hardened conditions had been given the wrong medication or the wrong dose. That's twice the indiscretion rate observed in Germany and the Netherlands.
Thursday, 12 January 2017
The Putting Too Much Salt In Food Is Typical Of Most Americans
The Putting Too Much Salt In Food Is Typical Of Most Americans.
Ninety percent of Americans are eating more brackish than they should, a redesigned sway report reveals. In fact, salt is so pervasive in the food supply it's finical for most people to consume less. Too much salt can increase your blood pressure, which is noteworthy risk factor for heart disease and stroke. "Nine in 10 American adults deplete more salt than is recommended," said report co-author Dr Elena V Kuklina, an epidemiologist in the Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention at the US Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention.
Kuklina eminent that most of the punch Americans consume comes from processed foods, not from the salt shaker on the table. You can button the salt in the shaker, but not the sodium added to processed foods. "The foods we have a bite most, grains and meats, contain the most sodium". These foods may not even taste salty.
Grains contain highly processed foods high in sodium such as grain-based frozen meals and soups and breads. The number of salt from meats was higher than expected, since the category included luncheon meats and sausages, according to the CDC report.
Because taste is so ubiquitous, it is almost impossible for individuals to control. It will categorically take a large public health effort to get food manufacturers and restaurants to depreciate the amount of salt used in foods they make.
This is a public health problem that will take years to solve. "It's not customary to happen tomorrow. The American food supply is, in a word, salty," agreed Dr David Katz, gaffer of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine. "Roughly 80 percent of the sodium we obsess comes not from our own sailor shakers, but from additions made by the food industry. The result of that is an average remaining of daily sodium intake measured in hundreds and hundreds of milligrams, and an annual excess of deaths from marrow disease and stroke exceeding 100000".
And "As indicated in a recent IOM Institute of Medicine report, the best conclusion to this problem is to dial down the sodium levels in processed foods. Taste buds acclimate very readily. If sodium levels slowly come down, we will unambiguously be taught to prefer less salty food. That process, in the other direction, has contributed to our current problem. We can reverse-engineer the usual preference for excessive salt".
Ninety percent of Americans are eating more brackish than they should, a redesigned sway report reveals. In fact, salt is so pervasive in the food supply it's finical for most people to consume less. Too much salt can increase your blood pressure, which is noteworthy risk factor for heart disease and stroke. "Nine in 10 American adults deplete more salt than is recommended," said report co-author Dr Elena V Kuklina, an epidemiologist in the Division of Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention at the US Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention.
Kuklina eminent that most of the punch Americans consume comes from processed foods, not from the salt shaker on the table. You can button the salt in the shaker, but not the sodium added to processed foods. "The foods we have a bite most, grains and meats, contain the most sodium". These foods may not even taste salty.
Grains contain highly processed foods high in sodium such as grain-based frozen meals and soups and breads. The number of salt from meats was higher than expected, since the category included luncheon meats and sausages, according to the CDC report.
Because taste is so ubiquitous, it is almost impossible for individuals to control. It will categorically take a large public health effort to get food manufacturers and restaurants to depreciate the amount of salt used in foods they make.
This is a public health problem that will take years to solve. "It's not customary to happen tomorrow. The American food supply is, in a word, salty," agreed Dr David Katz, gaffer of the Prevention Research Center at Yale University School of Medicine. "Roughly 80 percent of the sodium we obsess comes not from our own sailor shakers, but from additions made by the food industry. The result of that is an average remaining of daily sodium intake measured in hundreds and hundreds of milligrams, and an annual excess of deaths from marrow disease and stroke exceeding 100000".
And "As indicated in a recent IOM Institute of Medicine report, the best conclusion to this problem is to dial down the sodium levels in processed foods. Taste buds acclimate very readily. If sodium levels slowly come down, we will unambiguously be taught to prefer less salty food. That process, in the other direction, has contributed to our current problem. We can reverse-engineer the usual preference for excessive salt".
Friday, 19 August 2016
Stem Cells From A New Source For The Treatment Of The Heart
Stem Cells From A New Source For The Treatment Of The Heart.
Stem cells from the amniotic sac that surrounds a fetus may someday be old to renewal impair caused by a heart attack, Japanese researchers report. The work, so far only conducted in animals, raises the feasibility of a non-controversial source of stem cells to expound not only heart disease but also many other conditions, said Dr Shunichiro Miyoshi, an assistant professor in the cardiology subdivision at the Keio University School of Medicine, and co-author of a report in the May 28 online dissemination of Circulation Research. "I believe these cells may be utilized in the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as SLA systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis".
The amniotic sac is typically discarded after childbirth. SLA is an autoimmune disability in which the body's exempt system cells mistakenly seize healthy tissue. The cells that Miyoshi and his colleagues have used in mouse studies can simply be obtained in large numbers and offer another major advantage: they bypass the need to match donor-recipient apartment typing.
So "At the present time there is no barrier for clinical utilization. We can secure amniotic membrane from every delivery. We do not need to match donor-recipient matching of complicated HLA typing". HLA refers to the protein markers that are found on most of the body's cells. Transplanted cells that be at variance from the recipient's HLA quintessence will be attacked and destroyed by the immune system.
The Keio researchers have begun a series of studies aimed at the good-natured use of the amniotic stem cells. "Now we are performing the test on a swine model. Immediately after we get a good result, we are planning to perform clinical trials. I maintain it will go on within a few years. But it may depend on the strength of our government regulation".
The journal report describes laboratory make in which stem cells obtained from amniotic membranes were transformed into heart cells, 33 percent of which form spontaneously and which improved rat heart function by more than 34 percent when injected two weeks after a insensitivity attack. The injected cells decreased the room of heart damage by 13 percent to 18 percent and survived for more than four weeks in the rats without the use of drugs to run-in immune rejection. The amniotic cells are much easier to convert into kindness cells than stem cells from other sources, such as bone marrow or fat.
Stem cells from the amniotic sac that surrounds a fetus may someday be old to renewal impair caused by a heart attack, Japanese researchers report. The work, so far only conducted in animals, raises the feasibility of a non-controversial source of stem cells to expound not only heart disease but also many other conditions, said Dr Shunichiro Miyoshi, an assistant professor in the cardiology subdivision at the Keio University School of Medicine, and co-author of a report in the May 28 online dissemination of Circulation Research. "I believe these cells may be utilized in the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as SLA systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis".
The amniotic sac is typically discarded after childbirth. SLA is an autoimmune disability in which the body's exempt system cells mistakenly seize healthy tissue. The cells that Miyoshi and his colleagues have used in mouse studies can simply be obtained in large numbers and offer another major advantage: they bypass the need to match donor-recipient apartment typing.
So "At the present time there is no barrier for clinical utilization. We can secure amniotic membrane from every delivery. We do not need to match donor-recipient matching of complicated HLA typing". HLA refers to the protein markers that are found on most of the body's cells. Transplanted cells that be at variance from the recipient's HLA quintessence will be attacked and destroyed by the immune system.
The Keio researchers have begun a series of studies aimed at the good-natured use of the amniotic stem cells. "Now we are performing the test on a swine model. Immediately after we get a good result, we are planning to perform clinical trials. I maintain it will go on within a few years. But it may depend on the strength of our government regulation".
The journal report describes laboratory make in which stem cells obtained from amniotic membranes were transformed into heart cells, 33 percent of which form spontaneously and which improved rat heart function by more than 34 percent when injected two weeks after a insensitivity attack. The injected cells decreased the room of heart damage by 13 percent to 18 percent and survived for more than four weeks in the rats without the use of drugs to run-in immune rejection. The amniotic cells are much easier to convert into kindness cells than stem cells from other sources, such as bone marrow or fat.
Saturday, 16 July 2016
Frequent Consumption Of Energy Drinks Can Lead To Poor Health
Frequent Consumption Of Energy Drinks Can Lead To Poor Health.
As the lionization of vim and vigour drinks has soared, so has the number of Americans seeking care in hospital emergency rooms after consuming these highly caffeinated beverages, federal health officials report. Between 2007 and 2011, the add of ER visits more than doubled from roughly 10000 to almost 21000. In 2011, 58 percent of these ER visits tortuous energy drinks alone, while 42 percent also included medicament or alcohol use. Most of these cases complicated teens or young adults, although there was an alarming spike in the number of people aged 40 and older showing up in the ER after consuming these drinks, according to the clock in from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Symptoms ranged from insomnia, nervousness, headaches and rapid heartbeats to seizures. Energy drinks keep under control high amounts of caffeine that can stimulate both the central nervous system and cardiovascular system, experts note. Caffeine levels in spirit drinks range from about 80 milligrams (mg) to more than 500 mg in a can or bottle, the turn up noted, while a 5-ounce cup of coffee contains 100 mg of caffeine and a 12-ounce soda contains 50 mg of caffeine, the circulate said.
The beverages can also have other ingredients that may increase the stimulant effects of caffeine, according to report. Many doctors are vexed about the high levels of caffeine in energy drinks, which can cause a major increase in heart grade and drive up blood pressure, explained Dr Suzanne Steinbaum, a preventive cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "In anyone who has any underlying sentiment condition, these two clobber can be deadly," she told HealthDay recently. "Know what you're drinking before you drink it".
Dr Mary Claire O'Brien, a important expert on energy drinks from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston Salem, NC, had this this to about about the findings. "The issue is not the doubling of pinch department visits. That is the symptom," O'Brien said. "The 'disease' is the lemon of the federal government to regulate energy drinks as beverages".
As the lionization of vim and vigour drinks has soared, so has the number of Americans seeking care in hospital emergency rooms after consuming these highly caffeinated beverages, federal health officials report. Between 2007 and 2011, the add of ER visits more than doubled from roughly 10000 to almost 21000. In 2011, 58 percent of these ER visits tortuous energy drinks alone, while 42 percent also included medicament or alcohol use. Most of these cases complicated teens or young adults, although there was an alarming spike in the number of people aged 40 and older showing up in the ER after consuming these drinks, according to the clock in from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Symptoms ranged from insomnia, nervousness, headaches and rapid heartbeats to seizures. Energy drinks keep under control high amounts of caffeine that can stimulate both the central nervous system and cardiovascular system, experts note. Caffeine levels in spirit drinks range from about 80 milligrams (mg) to more than 500 mg in a can or bottle, the turn up noted, while a 5-ounce cup of coffee contains 100 mg of caffeine and a 12-ounce soda contains 50 mg of caffeine, the circulate said.
The beverages can also have other ingredients that may increase the stimulant effects of caffeine, according to report. Many doctors are vexed about the high levels of caffeine in energy drinks, which can cause a major increase in heart grade and drive up blood pressure, explained Dr Suzanne Steinbaum, a preventive cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "In anyone who has any underlying sentiment condition, these two clobber can be deadly," she told HealthDay recently. "Know what you're drinking before you drink it".
Dr Mary Claire O'Brien, a important expert on energy drinks from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston Salem, NC, had this this to about about the findings. "The issue is not the doubling of pinch department visits. That is the symptom," O'Brien said. "The 'disease' is the lemon of the federal government to regulate energy drinks as beverages".
Sunday, 3 July 2016
Most Americans Have Had A Difficult Childhood
Most Americans Have Had A Difficult Childhood.
Almost 60 percent of American adults foretell they had awkward childhoods featuring abusive or troubled kinsfolk members or parents who were absent due to separation or divorce, federal health officials report. In fact, nearly 9 percent said that while growing up they underwent five or more "adverse babyhood experiences" ranging from verbal, manifest or sexual abuse to family dysfunction such as domestic violence, downer or alcohol abuse, or the absence of a parent, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "Adverse boyhood experiences are common," said study coauthor Valerie J Edwards, side lead for the Adverse Childhood Experiences Team at CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
And "We paucity to do a lot more to protect children and help families". About a leniency of the more than 26000 adults surveyed reported experiencing verbal abuse as children, nearly 15 percent had been concrete abused, and more than 12 percent - more than one in ten - had been sexually misused as a child. Since the data are self-reported, Edwards believes that the real extent of lad abuse may be still greater. "There is a tendency to under-report rather than over-report".
The findings are published in the Dec 17, 2010 version of the CDC's journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. For the report, researchers occupied data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which surveyed 26229 adults in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Tennessee and Washington. Edwards is prudent about extrapolating these results, but based on other facts they probably are about the same in other states.
While there were few racial or ethnic differences in reports of abuse, the publish confirmed that women were more likely than men to have been sexually abused as children. In addition, kinsmen 55 and older were less likely to report being abused as a child compared to younger adults.
One theory why older males and females did not report as much childhood abuse is that since these takes a toll on health in adulthood, many of these older maltreat victims may have died early. The CDC report, for example, notes that adverse youth experiences are associated with a higher risk of depression, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, sum total abuse and premature death. "So childhood abuse may be associated with years of mortal lost".
There was no difference in the number of people reporting childhood abuse in any other age group. Adverse minority experiences included in the report included verbal abuse, physical abuse, lustful abuse, incarceration of a family member, family mental illness, family possessions abuse, domestic violence and divorce.
Almost 60 percent of American adults foretell they had awkward childhoods featuring abusive or troubled kinsfolk members or parents who were absent due to separation or divorce, federal health officials report. In fact, nearly 9 percent said that while growing up they underwent five or more "adverse babyhood experiences" ranging from verbal, manifest or sexual abuse to family dysfunction such as domestic violence, downer or alcohol abuse, or the absence of a parent, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). "Adverse boyhood experiences are common," said study coauthor Valerie J Edwards, side lead for the Adverse Childhood Experiences Team at CDC's National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
And "We paucity to do a lot more to protect children and help families". About a leniency of the more than 26000 adults surveyed reported experiencing verbal abuse as children, nearly 15 percent had been concrete abused, and more than 12 percent - more than one in ten - had been sexually misused as a child. Since the data are self-reported, Edwards believes that the real extent of lad abuse may be still greater. "There is a tendency to under-report rather than over-report".
The findings are published in the Dec 17, 2010 version of the CDC's journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. For the report, researchers occupied data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which surveyed 26229 adults in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Tennessee and Washington. Edwards is prudent about extrapolating these results, but based on other facts they probably are about the same in other states.
While there were few racial or ethnic differences in reports of abuse, the publish confirmed that women were more likely than men to have been sexually abused as children. In addition, kinsmen 55 and older were less likely to report being abused as a child compared to younger adults.
One theory why older males and females did not report as much childhood abuse is that since these takes a toll on health in adulthood, many of these older maltreat victims may have died early. The CDC report, for example, notes that adverse youth experiences are associated with a higher risk of depression, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, sum total abuse and premature death. "So childhood abuse may be associated with years of mortal lost".
There was no difference in the number of people reporting childhood abuse in any other age group. Adverse minority experiences included in the report included verbal abuse, physical abuse, lustful abuse, incarceration of a family member, family mental illness, family possessions abuse, domestic violence and divorce.
Sunday, 27 March 2016
Special Report On Environmentally Induced Cancer
Special Report On Environmentally Induced Cancer.
The United States is not doing enough to lose weight the occurrence of environmentally induced cancers, a risk that has been "grossly underestimated," a special statement released Thursday by the President's Cancer Panel shows. In particular, the authors acuminate to the apparent health effects of 80,000 or so chemicals, including bisphenol A (BPA), that are hand-me-down daily by millions of Americans. Studies have linked BPA with different types of cancer, at least in monster and laboratory tests.
So "The real burden of environmentally induced cancer greatly underestimates vulnerability to carcinogens and is not addressed adequately by the National Cancer Program," said Dr LaSalle D Leffall Jr, chairperson of the panel and Charles R Drew professor of surgery at Howard University College of Medicine in Washington, DC "We scarcity to expel these carcinogens from workplaces, homes and schools, and we need to start doing that now. There's ample possibility for intervention and change, and prevention to protect the health of all Americans".
The American Cancer Society, however, has painted a less ghastly picture of progress in the last several decades. "What does not come across is the very large extent that has been learned about the causes of cancer and prevention efforts to address them," said Dr Michael Thun, corruption president emeritus of epidemiology and surveillance research at the American Cancer Society. "Tobacco lead is probably the single biggest public health accomplishment of the past 60 years. They are advocates for this peculiar focus of cancer prevention, but cancer prevention is much broader than this".
Despite advances, cancer is still a critical public health problem in the United States and about 41 percent of Americans will be diagnosed with cancer at some spike in their lives, the report stated. Twenty-one percent will kick the bucket of the disease. The panel is an advisory group appointed to monitor the development and enactment of the National Cancer Program. The group's report addresses a different topic every year.
The United States is not doing enough to lose weight the occurrence of environmentally induced cancers, a risk that has been "grossly underestimated," a special statement released Thursday by the President's Cancer Panel shows. In particular, the authors acuminate to the apparent health effects of 80,000 or so chemicals, including bisphenol A (BPA), that are hand-me-down daily by millions of Americans. Studies have linked BPA with different types of cancer, at least in monster and laboratory tests.
So "The real burden of environmentally induced cancer greatly underestimates vulnerability to carcinogens and is not addressed adequately by the National Cancer Program," said Dr LaSalle D Leffall Jr, chairperson of the panel and Charles R Drew professor of surgery at Howard University College of Medicine in Washington, DC "We scarcity to expel these carcinogens from workplaces, homes and schools, and we need to start doing that now. There's ample possibility for intervention and change, and prevention to protect the health of all Americans".
The American Cancer Society, however, has painted a less ghastly picture of progress in the last several decades. "What does not come across is the very large extent that has been learned about the causes of cancer and prevention efforts to address them," said Dr Michael Thun, corruption president emeritus of epidemiology and surveillance research at the American Cancer Society. "Tobacco lead is probably the single biggest public health accomplishment of the past 60 years. They are advocates for this peculiar focus of cancer prevention, but cancer prevention is much broader than this".
Despite advances, cancer is still a critical public health problem in the United States and about 41 percent of Americans will be diagnosed with cancer at some spike in their lives, the report stated. Twenty-one percent will kick the bucket of the disease. The panel is an advisory group appointed to monitor the development and enactment of the National Cancer Program. The group's report addresses a different topic every year.
Friday, 15 January 2016
The Use Of Energy Drinks And Alcohol Is Dangerous In Adolescence
The Use Of Energy Drinks And Alcohol Is Dangerous In Adolescence.
A uncharted account warns that popular energy drinks such as Red Bull and Rockstar pretence potential hazards to teens, especially when mixed with alcohol. The report, published in the February discharge of the journal Pediatrics in Review, summarizes existing research and concludes that the caffeine-laden beverages can cause lightning heartbeat, high blood pressure, obesity and other medical problems in teens. Combined with alcohol, the implied harms can be severe, the authors noted. "I don't reckon there is any sensationalism going on here.
These drinks can be dangerous for teens," said review heroine author Dr Kwabena Blankson, a US Air Force major and an adolescent medication specialist at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, VA. "They contain too much caffeine and other additives that we don't recall enough about. Healthy eating, exercise and adequate sleep are better ways to get energy".
Doctors and parents poverty to "intelligently speak to teenagers about why energy drinks may not be safe. They necessity to ask teens if they are drinking energy drinks and suggest healthy alternatives". Surveys suggest that as many as half of prepubescent people consume these unregulated beverages, often in search of a hefty dose of caffeine to help them trail up, stay awake or get a "buzz".
Sixteen-ounce cans of Red Bull, Monster Energy Assault and Rockstar hold about 160 milligrams (mg) of caffeine, according to the report. However, a much smaller container of the the sauce Cocaine - minutes banned in 2007 - delivers 280 mg in just 8,4 ounces. By contrast, a conventional cup of coffee packs a caffeine punch of about 100 mg. Too much caffeine "can have troubling ancillary effects". More than 100 milligrams of caffeine a daytime is considered unhealthy for teens.
Energy drinks are often served cold and sometimes with ice, making them easier to chug than sultry coffee. And many contain additives such as sugar, ginseng and guarana, which increase the effect of caffeine, the researchers explained. "We don't know what these additives do to the body after periods of extended use". Moreover, boyish people often mix energy drinks and alkie beverages, or buy energy drinks that contain alcohol.
A uncharted account warns that popular energy drinks such as Red Bull and Rockstar pretence potential hazards to teens, especially when mixed with alcohol. The report, published in the February discharge of the journal Pediatrics in Review, summarizes existing research and concludes that the caffeine-laden beverages can cause lightning heartbeat, high blood pressure, obesity and other medical problems in teens. Combined with alcohol, the implied harms can be severe, the authors noted. "I don't reckon there is any sensationalism going on here.
These drinks can be dangerous for teens," said review heroine author Dr Kwabena Blankson, a US Air Force major and an adolescent medication specialist at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, VA. "They contain too much caffeine and other additives that we don't recall enough about. Healthy eating, exercise and adequate sleep are better ways to get energy".
Doctors and parents poverty to "intelligently speak to teenagers about why energy drinks may not be safe. They necessity to ask teens if they are drinking energy drinks and suggest healthy alternatives". Surveys suggest that as many as half of prepubescent people consume these unregulated beverages, often in search of a hefty dose of caffeine to help them trail up, stay awake or get a "buzz".
Sixteen-ounce cans of Red Bull, Monster Energy Assault and Rockstar hold about 160 milligrams (mg) of caffeine, according to the report. However, a much smaller container of the the sauce Cocaine - minutes banned in 2007 - delivers 280 mg in just 8,4 ounces. By contrast, a conventional cup of coffee packs a caffeine punch of about 100 mg. Too much caffeine "can have troubling ancillary effects". More than 100 milligrams of caffeine a daytime is considered unhealthy for teens.
Energy drinks are often served cold and sometimes with ice, making them easier to chug than sultry coffee. And many contain additives such as sugar, ginseng and guarana, which increase the effect of caffeine, the researchers explained. "We don't know what these additives do to the body after periods of extended use". Moreover, boyish people often mix energy drinks and alkie beverages, or buy energy drinks that contain alcohol.
Wednesday, 26 March 2014
Americans Consume Too Much Salt
Americans Consume Too Much Salt.
Americans' admiration of salt has continued unabated in the 21st century, putting subjects at risk for high blood pressure, the unrivalled cause of heart attack and stroke, US health officials said Thursday. In 2010, more than 90 percent of US teenagers and adults consumed more than the recommended levels of salty - about the same multitude as in 2003, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in Dec 2013. "Salt intake in the US has changed very dwarf in the last decade," said CDC medical official and report co-author Dr Niu Tian. And despite a slight slack in salt consumption among kids younger than 13, the researchers found 80 percent to 90 percent of kids still preoccupy more than the amount recommended by the Institute of Medicine.
And "There are many organizations that are focused on reducing dietary pepper intake," said Dr Gregg Fonarow, a spokesman for the American Heart Association and a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles. "More able efforts are needed if the control of excess dietary salt intake is to be reduced," Fonarow said. The CDC has suggested coupling salt-reduction efforts with the take up arms on obesity as a way to mettle both problems at the same time.
New school food guidelines might also be warranted, the report suggested. Samantha Heller, a elder clinical nutritionist at the NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, said reducing dietary season is essential for both adults and children. "What is so distressing is that this explosion indicates that eight out of 10 kids aged 1 to 3 years old, and nine out of 10 over 4 years old, are eating too much relish and are at risk for high blood pressure. Most of this poignancy comes from processed foods and restaurant meals, not the salt shaker on the table, Heller said.
That means it's no doubt that much of the food these children eat is fast food, waste food and processed food, she said. "This translates into a high-salt, high-fat and high-sugar fare that can lead to a number of serious health problems down the road. In addition, both fast and processed prog alters taste expectations, leading to constant parental complaints that their kids won't sup anything but chicken nuggets and hot dogs, Heller said.
Americans' admiration of salt has continued unabated in the 21st century, putting subjects at risk for high blood pressure, the unrivalled cause of heart attack and stroke, US health officials said Thursday. In 2010, more than 90 percent of US teenagers and adults consumed more than the recommended levels of salty - about the same multitude as in 2003, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in Dec 2013. "Salt intake in the US has changed very dwarf in the last decade," said CDC medical official and report co-author Dr Niu Tian. And despite a slight slack in salt consumption among kids younger than 13, the researchers found 80 percent to 90 percent of kids still preoccupy more than the amount recommended by the Institute of Medicine.
And "There are many organizations that are focused on reducing dietary pepper intake," said Dr Gregg Fonarow, a spokesman for the American Heart Association and a professor of cardiology at the University of California, Los Angeles. "More able efforts are needed if the control of excess dietary salt intake is to be reduced," Fonarow said. The CDC has suggested coupling salt-reduction efforts with the take up arms on obesity as a way to mettle both problems at the same time.
New school food guidelines might also be warranted, the report suggested. Samantha Heller, a elder clinical nutritionist at the NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City, said reducing dietary season is essential for both adults and children. "What is so distressing is that this explosion indicates that eight out of 10 kids aged 1 to 3 years old, and nine out of 10 over 4 years old, are eating too much relish and are at risk for high blood pressure. Most of this poignancy comes from processed foods and restaurant meals, not the salt shaker on the table, Heller said.
That means it's no doubt that much of the food these children eat is fast food, waste food and processed food, she said. "This translates into a high-salt, high-fat and high-sugar fare that can lead to a number of serious health problems down the road. In addition, both fast and processed prog alters taste expectations, leading to constant parental complaints that their kids won't sup anything but chicken nuggets and hot dogs, Heller said.
Sunday, 5 January 2014
How To Behave In Hot Weather
How To Behave In Hot Weather.
It's only initially June 2013, but already soaring temperatures have hit some parts of the United States. So sway health officials are reminding the supporters that while hundreds die from heat exposure each summer, there are way to minimize the risk. "No one should pop off from a heat wave, but every year on average, extreme heat causes 658 deaths in the United States - more than tornadoes, hurricanes, floods and lightning combined," Dr Robin Ikeda, acting guide of the National Center for Environmental Health at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an power scandal release. A new gunfire released from the CDC found that there were more than 7200 heat-related deaths in the United States between 1999 and 2009.
Those most at peril included seniors, children, the poor and people with pre-existing medical conditions. One "extreme fury event" - with maximum temperatures topping 100 degrees - lasted for two weeks go the distance July and centered on Maryland, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia. That occasion alone claimed 32 lives, the CDC said. Storms can pit oneself against a major role in heat-related deaths as well, the agency noted.
Immediately before the arrival of the extreme exhilaration in the July event, intense thunderstorms with high winds caused widespread damage and influence outages, leaving many without air conditioning. In 22 percent of the deaths, loss of authorization from the storms was known to be a contributing factor, the report found. The median age of the masses who died was 65 and more than two-thirds died at home.
According to the report, three-quarters of victims were unmarried or lived alone. Many had underlying strength issues such as heart disease and chronic respiratory disease. There was one ablaze with spot in the report: Fewer deaths were reported last year than in antecedent extreme heat events. That's likely due to measures taken by local and state agencies, according to the promulgate published in the June 6 issue of the CDC journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
It's only initially June 2013, but already soaring temperatures have hit some parts of the United States. So sway health officials are reminding the supporters that while hundreds die from heat exposure each summer, there are way to minimize the risk. "No one should pop off from a heat wave, but every year on average, extreme heat causes 658 deaths in the United States - more than tornadoes, hurricanes, floods and lightning combined," Dr Robin Ikeda, acting guide of the National Center for Environmental Health at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an power scandal release. A new gunfire released from the CDC found that there were more than 7200 heat-related deaths in the United States between 1999 and 2009.
Those most at peril included seniors, children, the poor and people with pre-existing medical conditions. One "extreme fury event" - with maximum temperatures topping 100 degrees - lasted for two weeks go the distance July and centered on Maryland, Ohio, Virginia and West Virginia. That occasion alone claimed 32 lives, the CDC said. Storms can pit oneself against a major role in heat-related deaths as well, the agency noted.
Immediately before the arrival of the extreme exhilaration in the July event, intense thunderstorms with high winds caused widespread damage and influence outages, leaving many without air conditioning. In 22 percent of the deaths, loss of authorization from the storms was known to be a contributing factor, the report found. The median age of the masses who died was 65 and more than two-thirds died at home.
According to the report, three-quarters of victims were unmarried or lived alone. Many had underlying strength issues such as heart disease and chronic respiratory disease. There was one ablaze with spot in the report: Fewer deaths were reported last year than in antecedent extreme heat events. That's likely due to measures taken by local and state agencies, according to the promulgate published in the June 6 issue of the CDC journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)