Very Few People Over Age 50 Are Diagnosed By Detection Of Skin Cancer.
Too few middle-aged and older pasty Americans are being screened for lamina cancer, a especial problem among those who did not finish high school or receive other worn out cancer screenings, a new study has found. Researchers analyzed data from 10,486 anaemic men and women, aged 50 and older, who took part in the 2005 National Health Interview Survey.
Only 16 percent of men and 13 percent of women reported having a husk exam in the past year. The lowest rates of skin cancer screenings were all men and women aged 50 to 64, people with some high school upbringing or less, those without a history of skin cancer, and those who hadn't had a recent screening for breast cancer, prostate cancer or colorectal cancer.
So "With those older than 50 being at a higher jeopardy for developing melanoma, our library results clearly indicate that more intervention is needed in this population," study author Elliot J Coups, a behavioral scientist at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey and an collaborator professor of panacea at UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, said in a news release from the institute. "Of exacting interest is the amount of education one has and how that may affect whether a person is screened or not screened for coating cancer.
Is it a matter of a person not knowing the importance of such an examination or where to get such a screening and from whom? Is it a topic of one's insurance not covering a dermatologist or there being no coverage at all? We are hopeful this study leads to further scrutiny among health-care professionals, particularly among community physicians, about what steps can be infatuated to ensure their patients are receiving information on skin cancer screening and are being presented with opportunities to draw that examination," Coups said. Skin cancer is the most common of all cancers, according to the American Cancer Society.
Showing posts with label screened. Show all posts
Showing posts with label screened. Show all posts
Thursday, 19 December 2013
Saturday, 23 November 2013
Mass Screening For Prostate Cancer Can Have Unpleasant Consequences
Mass Screening For Prostate Cancer Can Have Unpleasant Consequences.
Health campaigns that highlight the mind-boggler of destitute screening rates for prostate cancer to sanction such screenings seem to have an unintended effect: They discourage men from undergoing a prostate exam, a rejuvenated German study suggests. The finding, reported in the current issue of Psychological Science, stems from ply by a research team from the University of Heidelberg that gauged the intention to get screened for prostate cancer amidst men over the age of 45 who reside in two German cities.
In earlier research, the reflect on authors had found that men who had never had such screenings tended to believe that most men hadn't either. In the prevalent effort, the team exposed men who had never been screened to one of two health facts statements: either that only 18 percent of German men had been screened in the past year, or that 65 percent of men had been screened.
Health campaigns that highlight the mind-boggler of destitute screening rates for prostate cancer to sanction such screenings seem to have an unintended effect: They discourage men from undergoing a prostate exam, a rejuvenated German study suggests. The finding, reported in the current issue of Psychological Science, stems from ply by a research team from the University of Heidelberg that gauged the intention to get screened for prostate cancer amidst men over the age of 45 who reside in two German cities.
In earlier research, the reflect on authors had found that men who had never had such screenings tended to believe that most men hadn't either. In the prevalent effort, the team exposed men who had never been screened to one of two health facts statements: either that only 18 percent of German men had been screened in the past year, or that 65 percent of men had been screened.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)