Some Medicines Purchased Via The Internet Can Be Dangerous

Some Medicines Purchased Via The Internet Can Be Dangerous.
Internet-based companies buy and sell them, men persist in to buy them and experts continue to apprise of the dangers of counterfeit drugs for erectile dysfunction. A new study, conducted in South Korea and slated for giving Monday at the American Urological Association annual meeting in San Francisco, finds that not only can these duplication drugs be contaminated, they may contain too much of the active ingredient or none at all. The drugs could especially be menacing for men with hypertension or heart disease, the study found.

The message? Stay away from non-prescription erectile dysfunction (ED) drugs, the experts say. "There are lots of rip-offs," said Dr John Morley, cicerone of geriatrics and acting chief of endocrinology at Saint Louis University. "There's still a lot of deposition that many of the things you buy off the Internet without going through a regular dispensary might appear cheaper or better but they're usually not and they usually don't work".

Drugs known as phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) are worn widely by men with erectile dysfunction - and sometimes by those without the condition. Perhaps the best known of the caste are sildenafil (Viagra) and tadalafil (Cialis). Since it was developed in 1998, the demand for these and similar products - legitimate or not - has mushroomed.

Treat Glaucoma Before It Is Too Late

Treat Glaucoma Before It Is Too Late.
Alan Leighton discovered he had glaucoma when he noticed a gray extent of remark in his left eye. That was in 1992. "I think about I had it a long time before that, but I didn't know until then," said Leighton, 68, a corporate treasurer who lives in Indianapolis. "Glaucoma is as if that. It's sneaky".

Leighton made an engagement with his ophthalmologist to see what was wrong. "We went for a bunch of tests, and he unfaltering there was an issue with that eye, and that I had normal pressure glaucoma".

His response was unsentimental and pragmatic: His kids has a history of glaucoma, so the news wasn't a total surprise. "I pronounced that we needed to take the most proactive methods we could. I would go to the best people I could find and behold what methods they had to address it and keep it from getting worse. I wanted to keep it from affecting my right eye, which was extent clear. I didn't know what the process was going to be to actually stop the glaucoma or veto it, if it was even possible. I don't know if there was a lot of emotion involved. It was more like, 'Hey, what can we do about this?'".

He asked if there was any style to restore the sight he'd lost, and the answer was no. "They charming much said that gray area in my left eye was going to stay there, and there was no chance to do any procedures to effectively change that. It had something to do with the optic nerve".