Showing posts with label users. Show all posts
Showing posts with label users. Show all posts

Saturday 4 January 2020

Prolonged Use Of Statins Does Not Increase The Risk Of Cancer

Prolonged Use Of Statins Does Not Increase The Risk Of Cancer.
New explore supports the general idea that patients who take cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins may not have an increased hazard for cancer, as some previous studies suggested. Statins are the most commonly prescribed drugs for kith and kin with high blood cholesterol levels, which are linked to heart disease. Brand names number Crestor, Lipitor and Zocor. "Three or four years ago there was a broadening of articles pointing out that statins could produce cancer, and, at present, the most recent studies do not show this, and this is one of them," said Dr Valentin Fuster, by president of the American Heart Association and president of Mount Sinai Heart in New York City.

This latest study, slated for show Wednesday at the annual meeting of the American Heart Association in Chicago, was conducted by researchers from S2 Statistical Solutions, Inc, a ensemble that does economic research for health care-related businesses; the University of California, San Diego; and GE Healthcare, a allotment of General Electric, which provided the database for the study. Another just out study, reported Nov 10, 2010 at a assembly of the American Association for Cancer Research, also found that long-term use of statins did not increase the risk of cancer and might even dwindle users' risks for lymphoma, melanoma and endometrial tumors.

Monday 9 April 2018

Doctors Discovered How The Brain Dies

Doctors Discovered How The Brain Dies.
Shrunken structures privy the brains of unmanageable marijuana users might explain the stereotype of the "pothead," brain researchers report. Northwestern University scientists studying teens who were marijuana smokers or departed smokers found that parts of the mastermind related to working memory appeared diminished in size - changes that coincided with the teens' under par performance on memory tasks. "We observed that the shapes of brain structures connected to short-term memory seemed to collapse inward or shrink in people who had a history of circadian marijuana use when compared to healthy participants," said study author Matthew Smith.

He is an subordinate research professor in psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, in Chicago. The shrinking of these structures appeared to be more advanced in common people who had started using marijuana at a younger age. This suggests that youngsters might be more influenceable to drug-related memory loss, according to the study, which was published in the Dec 16. 2013 descendant of the journal Schizophrenia Bulletin.

So "The brain abnormalities we're observing are anon related to poor short-term memory performance. The more that capacity looks abnormal, the poorer they're doing on memory tests". The paper is provocative because the participants had not been using marijuana for a duo years, indicating that memory problems might persist even if the person quits smoking the drug, said Dr Frances Levin, chairman of the American Psychiatric Association's Council on Addiction Psychiatry. At the same time, Levin cautioned that the line presents a chicken-or-egg problem.

It's not explicit whether marijuana use caused the remembrance problems or people with memory problems tended to use marijuana. "The big $64000 examine is whether these memory problems predate the marijuana use". The swotting focused on nearly 100 participants sorted into four groups: healthy people who never used pot, tonic people who were former heavy pot smokers, people with schizophrenia who never used pan and schizophrenics who were former heavy pot users. Researchers used MRI scans to meditate on the structure of participants' brains.

Sunday 5 February 2017

High Doses Of Aspirin Reduce The Accuracy Of Colorectal Cancer Tests

High Doses Of Aspirin Reduce The Accuracy Of Colorectal Cancer Tests.
Stool tests that can observe blood from colorectal tumors are more meticulous for patients on a low-dose aspirin regimen, which is known to enhance intestinal bleeding, a new study suggests. While corrective aspirin use was once feared to skew the results of fecal occult blood tests, or FOBTs, German researchers found the prove was significantly more sensitive for low-dose aspirin users than for non-users. Future studies confirming the results could chain to recommendations to take small doses of aspirin before all such tests, gastroenterology experts said.

Aspirin's blood-thinning properties on some doctors to prescribe low-dose regimens (usually 75 mg up to 325 mg) to those at chance of cardiovascular events such as heart attacks. "We had expected that warmth was higher - that is, that more tumors were detected," said pilot researcher Dr Hermann Brenner, a cancer statistics expert at the German Cancer Research Center in Heidelberg, Germany. "The surprising denouement was how strongly sensitivity was raised".

The study, conducted from 2005 to 2009, included 1979 patients with an typical age of 62; 233 were good low-dose aspirin users, and 1746 never used it. Researchers analyzed the tenderness and accuracy of two fecal occult blood tests in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms, tumors that can either be spiteful or benign. Participants were given stool collection instructions and devices, including bowel organizing for a later colonoscopy to verify results of the FOBTs. They self-reported aspirin and other medication use in standardized questionnaires.

Advanced tumors were found in the same portion of aspirin users and non-users, but the sensitivity of both stool tests was significantly higher among those taking low-dose aspirin - 70,8 percent versus 35,9 percent sympathy on one test and 58,3 percent versus 32 percent on the second. "The tenet of stool tests in early detection of large bowel cancer is the detection of usually very pint-sized amounts of blood from the tumors. Use of low-dose aspirin facilitates this detection". His turn over is reported in the Dec 8, 2010 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Thursday 7 July 2016

New Study On Prevention Of Transfer Of HIV

New Study On Prevention Of Transfer Of HIV.
An antiviral hallucinogen may servant protect injection drug users from HIV infection, a green study finds. The study of more than 2400 injection drug users recruited at 17 narcotize treatment clinics in Thailand found that daily tablets of tenofovir reduced the risk of HIV infection by nearly 49 percent, compared to indolent placebo pills. One expert said an intervention to advise shield injection drug users from HIV - the virus that causes AIDS - is much needed.

And "This is an portentous study that opens up an additional option for preventing HIV in a hard-to-reach population," said Dr Joseph McGowan, medical chief at the Center for AIDS Research and Treatment at North Shore University Hospital in Manhasset, NY. He well-known that "HIV infections sustain to occur at high rates, with over 2,5 million worldwide and 50000 fresh infections in the US each year. This is despite widespread knowledge about HIV infection and the route it is spread, through unprotected sex and sharing needles for injecting drugs".

The participants included in the remodelled study were followed for an average of four years. During that time, 17 of the more than 1200 patients taking tenofovir became infected with HIV, compared with 33 of an counterpart number of patients taking a placebo, according to the analysis published online June 12, 2013 in The Lancet. Further analyses of the results showed that the vigilant effect of tenofovir was highest among those who most closely followed the drug's prescribed regimen.

In this group, the danger of HIV infection was reduced by more than 70 percent, said study leaders Dr Kachit Choopanya and Dr Michael Martin, prime of clinical research for the Thailand Ministry of Public Health-US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Collaboration. Prior investigate has shown that protection use of antiviral drugs cuts the risk of sexual transmission of HIV in both heterosexual couples and men who have bonking with men, and also reduces mother-to-child transmission of HIV.

Friday 30 October 2015

People Suffer Tragedy In Social Networks Hard

People Suffer Tragedy In Social Networks Hard.
If you squander much while on Facebook untagging yourself in unflattering photos and embarrassing posts, you're not alone. A inexperienced study, however, finds that some people take those awkward online moments harder than others. In an online inspection of 165 Facebook users, researchers found that nearly all of them could describe a Facebook common sense in the past six months that made them feel awkward, embarrassed or uncomfortable. But some nation had stronger emotional reactions to the experience, the survey found Dec 2013.

Not surprisingly, Facebook users who put a lot of cattle in socially appropriate behavior or self-image were more likely to be mortified by certain posts their friends made, such as a photo where they're undoubtedly drunk or one where they're perfectly sober but looking less than attractive. "If you're someone who's more modest offline, it makes sense that you would be online too," said Dr Megan Moreno, of Seattle Children's Hospital and the University of Washington.

Moreno, who was not interested in the research, studies brood people's use of social media. "There was a time when folk thought of the Internet as a place you go to be someone else. "But now it's become a place that's an augmentation of your real life". And social sites like Facebook and Twitter have made it trickier for commoners to keep the traditional boundaries between different areas of their lives.

In offline life settle generally have different "masks" that they show to different people - one for your close friends, another for your mom and yet another for your coworkers. On Facebook - where your mom, your best backer and your boss are all among your 700 "friends" - "those masks are blown apart. Indeed, family who use social-networking sites have handed over some of their self-presentation put down to other people, said study co-author Jeremy Birnholtz, director of the Social Media Lab at Northwestern University.

But the extent to which that bothers you seems to depend on who you are and who your Facebook friends are. For the study, Birnholtz's set used flyers and online ads to recruit 165 Facebook users - mainly sophomoric adults - for an online survey. Of those respondents, 150 said they'd had an discomfiting or awkward Facebook experience in the past six months.