Physically Active People Are More Likely To Prevail Over Cancer.
People undergoing cancer healing traditionally have been told to dozing as much as possible and steer clear of exertion, to save all their strength to battle the dreaded disease. But a growing number of physicians and researchers now impart that people who remain physically active as best they can during treatment are more likely to beat cancer. The unambiguous evidence for exercise during and after cancer treatment has piled so high that an American College of Sports Medicine panel is revising the group's public guidelines regarding exercise recommended for cancer survivors.
The panel's conclusion: Cancer patients and survivors should contend to get the same amount of irritate recommended for everyone else, about 150 minutes a week of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise. Resistance training and stretching also are recommended.
Showing posts with label people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label people. Show all posts
Tuesday 18 February 2020
Monday 17 February 2020
Why Low-Fat Products Are Not As Popular As Natural Fats
Why Low-Fat Products Are Not As Popular As Natural Fats.
The creaminess of fat-rich foods such as ice cream and salad dressing attraction to many, but additional fact indicates that some people can actually "taste" the fat lurking in invaluable foods and that those who can't may end up eating more of those foods. In a series of studies presented at the 2011 Institute of Food Technologists annual convention this week, scientists said research increasingly supports the impression that fat and fatty acids can be tasted, though they're primarily detected through smell and texture.
Those who can't preference the fat have a genetic variant in the way they process food possibly peerless them to crave fat subconsciously. "Those more sensitive to the fat content were better at controlling their weight," said Kathleen L Keller, a inquire into associate at New York Obesity Research Center at St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital.
And "We dream these people were protected from obesity because of their knack to detect small changes in fat content". Keller and her colleagues studied 317 trim black adults, identifying a common variant in the CD36 gene that was linked to self-reported preferences for added fats such as butters, oils and spreads.
The same different was also found to be linked with a preference for fat in gas dairy samples in a smaller group of children. Keller said it was important to confine the read sample to one ethnic group to limit possible gene variations.
Her team asked participants about their usual diets and how oily or creamy they perceived salad dressings with fat content ranging from 5 percent to 55 percent. About 21 percent of the assort had what the researchers called the "at-risk" genotype, reporting a fondness for fatty foods and perceiving the dressings to be creamier than other groups.
The creaminess of fat-rich foods such as ice cream and salad dressing attraction to many, but additional fact indicates that some people can actually "taste" the fat lurking in invaluable foods and that those who can't may end up eating more of those foods. In a series of studies presented at the 2011 Institute of Food Technologists annual convention this week, scientists said research increasingly supports the impression that fat and fatty acids can be tasted, though they're primarily detected through smell and texture.
Those who can't preference the fat have a genetic variant in the way they process food possibly peerless them to crave fat subconsciously. "Those more sensitive to the fat content were better at controlling their weight," said Kathleen L Keller, a inquire into associate at New York Obesity Research Center at St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital.
And "We dream these people were protected from obesity because of their knack to detect small changes in fat content". Keller and her colleagues studied 317 trim black adults, identifying a common variant in the CD36 gene that was linked to self-reported preferences for added fats such as butters, oils and spreads.
The same different was also found to be linked with a preference for fat in gas dairy samples in a smaller group of children. Keller said it was important to confine the read sample to one ethnic group to limit possible gene variations.
Her team asked participants about their usual diets and how oily or creamy they perceived salad dressings with fat content ranging from 5 percent to 55 percent. About 21 percent of the assort had what the researchers called the "at-risk" genotype, reporting a fondness for fatty foods and perceiving the dressings to be creamier than other groups.
Sunday 16 February 2020
Gastric Bypass Surgery And Treatment Of People With Type 2 Diabetes
Gastric Bypass Surgery And Treatment Of People With Type 2 Diabetes.
Though it began as a therapy for something else entirely, gastric circumvent surgery - which involves shrinking the longing as a way to lose weight - has proven to be the news and possibly most effective treatment for some people with type 2 diabetes. Just days after the surgery, even before they creation to lose weight, people with type 2 diabetes see sudden upswing in their blood sugar levels. Many are able to quickly come off their diabetes medications.
So "This is not a silver bullet," said Dr Vadim Sherman, medical leader of bariatric and metabolic surgery at the Methodist Hospital in Houston. "The or heraldry argent bullet is lifestyle changes, but gastric bypass is a mechanism that can help you get there". The surgery has risks, it isn't an appropriate treatment for everyone with archetype 2 diabetes and achieving the desired result still entails lifestyle changes.
And "The surgery is an competent option for obese people with type 2 diabetes, but it's a very big step," said Dr Michael Williams, an endocrinologist associated with the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle. "It allows them to be beaten a huge amount of weight and mimics what happens when people make lifestyle changes. But, the increase in glucose control is far more than we'd expect just from the weight loss".
Almost 26 million Americans have kidney 2 diabetes, according to the American Diabetes Association. Being overweight is a significant gamble factor for type 2 diabetes, but not everyone who has the disease is overweight. Type 2 occurs when the body stops using the hormone insulin effectively. Insulin helps glucose enter the body's cells to present energy.
Lifestyle changes, such as losing 5 to 10 percent of body avoirdupois and exercising regularly, are often the pre-eminent treatments suggested. Many people find it difficult to make permanent lifestyle changes on their own, however. Oral medications are also available, but these often prove inadequate to control type 2 diabetes adequately. Injected insulin can also be given as a treatment.
Surgeons start noted that gastric bypass surgeries had an drift on blood sugar control more than 50 years ago, according to a review article in a late-model issue of The Lancet. At that time, though, weight-loss surgeries were significantly riskier for the patient. But as techniques in bariatric surgery improved and the surgical intricacy rates came down, experts began to re-examine the objective the surgery was having on type 2 diabetes. In 2003, a consider in the Annals of Surgery reported that 83 percent of people with type 2 diabetes who underwent the weight-loss surgery known as Roux-en-Y gastric detour saw a resolution of their diabetes after surgery.
Though it began as a therapy for something else entirely, gastric circumvent surgery - which involves shrinking the longing as a way to lose weight - has proven to be the news and possibly most effective treatment for some people with type 2 diabetes. Just days after the surgery, even before they creation to lose weight, people with type 2 diabetes see sudden upswing in their blood sugar levels. Many are able to quickly come off their diabetes medications.
So "This is not a silver bullet," said Dr Vadim Sherman, medical leader of bariatric and metabolic surgery at the Methodist Hospital in Houston. "The or heraldry argent bullet is lifestyle changes, but gastric bypass is a mechanism that can help you get there". The surgery has risks, it isn't an appropriate treatment for everyone with archetype 2 diabetes and achieving the desired result still entails lifestyle changes.
And "The surgery is an competent option for obese people with type 2 diabetes, but it's a very big step," said Dr Michael Williams, an endocrinologist associated with the Swedish Medical Center in Seattle. "It allows them to be beaten a huge amount of weight and mimics what happens when people make lifestyle changes. But, the increase in glucose control is far more than we'd expect just from the weight loss".
Almost 26 million Americans have kidney 2 diabetes, according to the American Diabetes Association. Being overweight is a significant gamble factor for type 2 diabetes, but not everyone who has the disease is overweight. Type 2 occurs when the body stops using the hormone insulin effectively. Insulin helps glucose enter the body's cells to present energy.
Lifestyle changes, such as losing 5 to 10 percent of body avoirdupois and exercising regularly, are often the pre-eminent treatments suggested. Many people find it difficult to make permanent lifestyle changes on their own, however. Oral medications are also available, but these often prove inadequate to control type 2 diabetes adequately. Injected insulin can also be given as a treatment.
Surgeons start noted that gastric bypass surgeries had an drift on blood sugar control more than 50 years ago, according to a review article in a late-model issue of The Lancet. At that time, though, weight-loss surgeries were significantly riskier for the patient. But as techniques in bariatric surgery improved and the surgical intricacy rates came down, experts began to re-examine the objective the surgery was having on type 2 diabetes. In 2003, a consider in the Annals of Surgery reported that 83 percent of people with type 2 diabetes who underwent the weight-loss surgery known as Roux-en-Y gastric detour saw a resolution of their diabetes after surgery.
Tuesday 4 February 2020
Girls Mature Faster Than Boys
Girls Mature Faster Than Boys.
New acumen research suggests one ground girls mature faster than boys during their teen years. As people age, their brains reorganize and mark down connections. In this study, scientists examined brain scans from 121 thriving people, aged 4 to 40. It's during this period that the major changes in capacity connectivity occur. The researchers discovered that although the overall number of connections is reduced, the intelligence preserves long-distance connections important for integrating information.
The findings might explain why brain act the part of doesn't decline - but instead improves - during this period of connection pruning, according to the check in team. The researchers also found that these changes in brain connections begin at an earlier age in girls than in boys. "Long-distance connections are grim to establish and maintain but are crucial for fast and efficient processing," said sanctum co-leader Marcus Kaiser, of Newcastle University, in England.
New acumen research suggests one ground girls mature faster than boys during their teen years. As people age, their brains reorganize and mark down connections. In this study, scientists examined brain scans from 121 thriving people, aged 4 to 40. It's during this period that the major changes in capacity connectivity occur. The researchers discovered that although the overall number of connections is reduced, the intelligence preserves long-distance connections important for integrating information.
The findings might explain why brain act the part of doesn't decline - but instead improves - during this period of connection pruning, according to the check in team. The researchers also found that these changes in brain connections begin at an earlier age in girls than in boys. "Long-distance connections are grim to establish and maintain but are crucial for fast and efficient processing," said sanctum co-leader Marcus Kaiser, of Newcastle University, in England.
Sunday 2 February 2020
Scientists Have Discovered A Gene Of Alzheimer's Disease
Scientists Have Discovered A Gene Of Alzheimer's Disease.
People with a high-risk gene for Alzheimer's plague can begin to have discernment changes as early as childhood, according to a new study. The SORL1 gene is one of several associated with an increased endanger of late-onset Alzheimer's, the most common cultivate of the disease. SORL1 carries the code for a specific type of receptor that helps recycle destined molecules in the brain before they develop into beta-amyloid. Beta-amyloid is a protein associated with Alzheimer's.
The gene is also convoluted in fat metabolism, which is linked to a different "pathway" for developing Alzheimer's, the study authors noted. For the study, the researchers conducted wisdom scans of healthy people aged 8 to 86. Study participants with a circumscribed copy of SORL1 had reductions in white matter connections that are influential for memory and higher thinking. This was true even in the youngest participants.
People with a high-risk gene for Alzheimer's plague can begin to have discernment changes as early as childhood, according to a new study. The SORL1 gene is one of several associated with an increased endanger of late-onset Alzheimer's, the most common cultivate of the disease. SORL1 carries the code for a specific type of receptor that helps recycle destined molecules in the brain before they develop into beta-amyloid. Beta-amyloid is a protein associated with Alzheimer's.
The gene is also convoluted in fat metabolism, which is linked to a different "pathway" for developing Alzheimer's, the study authors noted. For the study, the researchers conducted wisdom scans of healthy people aged 8 to 86. Study participants with a circumscribed copy of SORL1 had reductions in white matter connections that are influential for memory and higher thinking. This was true even in the youngest participants.
Wednesday 22 January 2020
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV.
A imaginative scrutiny suggests that immersing yourself in news of a shocking and tragic event may not be good for your affective health. People who watched, read and listened to the most coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings - six or more hours quotidian - reported the most acute stress levels over the following weeks. Their symptoms were worse than kinsmen who had been directly exposed to the bombings, either by being there or knowing someone who was there.
Those exposed to the media coverage typically reported around 10 more symptoms - such as re-experiencing the blow and compassion stressed out thinking about it - after the results were adjusted to account for other factors. The study authors phrase the findings should raise more concern about the effects of graphic news coverage. The scrutinize comes with caveats. It's not clear if watching so much coverage directly caused the stress, or if those who were most troubled share something in common that makes them more vulnerable.
Nor is it known whether the stress affected people's true health. Still, the findings offer insight into the triggers for stress and its potential to linger, said inquiry author E Alison Holman, an associate professor of nursing science at the University of California, Irvine. "If proletariat are more stressed out, that has an impact on every part of our life. But not everybody under the sun has those kinds of reactions.
It's important to understand that variation". Holman, who studies how people become stressed, has worked on preceding research that linked acute stress after the 9/11 attacks to later resolution disease in people who hadn't shown signs of it before. Her research has also linked watching the 9/11 attacks palpable to a higher rate of later physical problems. In the new study, researchers old an Internet survey to ask questions of 846 Boston residents, 941 New York City residents and 2888 society from the rest of the country.
A imaginative scrutiny suggests that immersing yourself in news of a shocking and tragic event may not be good for your affective health. People who watched, read and listened to the most coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings - six or more hours quotidian - reported the most acute stress levels over the following weeks. Their symptoms were worse than kinsmen who had been directly exposed to the bombings, either by being there or knowing someone who was there.
Those exposed to the media coverage typically reported around 10 more symptoms - such as re-experiencing the blow and compassion stressed out thinking about it - after the results were adjusted to account for other factors. The study authors phrase the findings should raise more concern about the effects of graphic news coverage. The scrutinize comes with caveats. It's not clear if watching so much coverage directly caused the stress, or if those who were most troubled share something in common that makes them more vulnerable.
Nor is it known whether the stress affected people's true health. Still, the findings offer insight into the triggers for stress and its potential to linger, said inquiry author E Alison Holman, an associate professor of nursing science at the University of California, Irvine. "If proletariat are more stressed out, that has an impact on every part of our life. But not everybody under the sun has those kinds of reactions.
It's important to understand that variation". Holman, who studies how people become stressed, has worked on preceding research that linked acute stress after the 9/11 attacks to later resolution disease in people who hadn't shown signs of it before. Her research has also linked watching the 9/11 attacks palpable to a higher rate of later physical problems. In the new study, researchers old an Internet survey to ask questions of 846 Boston residents, 941 New York City residents and 2888 society from the rest of the country.
Wednesday 8 January 2020
Rheumatoid Arthritis And Shingles
Rheumatoid Arthritis And Shingles.
The newest medications old to scrutinize autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis don't appear to raise the risk of developing shingles, experimental research indicates. There has been concern that these medications, called anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, might prolong the chances of a shingles infection (also known as herpes zoster) because they create by suppressing a part of the immune system that causes the autoimmune attack. "These are commonly in use drugs for people with rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases, and the issue was whether or not they increased the risk of shingles.
We found there is no increased hazard when using these drugs, which was reassuring," said study author Dr Kevin Winthrop, friend professor of infectious disease and public health and preventive medicine at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. Results of the contemplate are published in the March 6 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Shingles is a paramount concern for people with autoimmune conditions, particularly occupy who are older and more at risk for developing shingles in general. Shingles is caused when the same virus that causes chickenpox is reactivated. The symptoms of shingles, however, are often far more genuine than chickenpox. It typically starts with a ardent or tingling pain, which is followed by the appearance of fluid-filled blisters, according to the US National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Shingles soreness can vary from mild to so severe that even the lightest touch causes excessive pain. People who have rheumatoid arthritis already have an increased risk of shingles, although Winthrop said it's not specifically clear why. It may be due to older age, or it may have something to do with the disease itself. Rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune conditions are treated with many unlike medications that help dampen the immune set and, hopefully, the autoimmune attack.
The newest medications old to scrutinize autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis don't appear to raise the risk of developing shingles, experimental research indicates. There has been concern that these medications, called anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) drugs, might prolong the chances of a shingles infection (also known as herpes zoster) because they create by suppressing a part of the immune system that causes the autoimmune attack. "These are commonly in use drugs for people with rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases, and the issue was whether or not they increased the risk of shingles.
We found there is no increased hazard when using these drugs, which was reassuring," said study author Dr Kevin Winthrop, friend professor of infectious disease and public health and preventive medicine at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland. Results of the contemplate are published in the March 6 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
Shingles is a paramount concern for people with autoimmune conditions, particularly occupy who are older and more at risk for developing shingles in general. Shingles is caused when the same virus that causes chickenpox is reactivated. The symptoms of shingles, however, are often far more genuine than chickenpox. It typically starts with a ardent or tingling pain, which is followed by the appearance of fluid-filled blisters, according to the US National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.
Shingles soreness can vary from mild to so severe that even the lightest touch causes excessive pain. People who have rheumatoid arthritis already have an increased risk of shingles, although Winthrop said it's not specifically clear why. It may be due to older age, or it may have something to do with the disease itself. Rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune conditions are treated with many unlike medications that help dampen the immune set and, hopefully, the autoimmune attack.
Tuesday 7 January 2020
The Presence Of A Few Extra Pounds In Man Reduces The Risk Of Sudden Death
The Presence Of A Few Extra Pounds In Man Reduces The Risk Of Sudden Death.
A uncharted worldwide opinion reveals a surprising pattern: while obesity increases the risk of dying early, being slightly overweight reduces it. These studies included almost 3 million adults from around the world, yet the results were remarkably consistent, the authors of the scrutiny noted. "For populate with a medical condition, survival is slight better for people who are slightly heavier," said study author Katherine Flegal, a older research scientist at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics.
Several factors may narrative for this finding. "Maybe heavier people present to the doctor earlier, or get screened more often. Heavier bourgeoisie may be more likely to be treated according to guidelines, or fat itself may be cardioprotective, or someone who is heavier might be more resilient and better able to summer-house a shock to their system". The report was published Jan. 2 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
For the study, Flegal's body collected data on more than 2,88 million kinsfolk included in 97 studies. These studies were done in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, China, Taiwan, Japan, Brazil, Israel, India and Mexico. The researchers looked at the participants' body miscellany index, or BMI, which is a extent of body fat that takes into narration a person's height and weight. Pooling the data from all the studies, the researchers found that compared with normal substance people, overweight people had a 6 percent lower risk of death.
Obese people, however, had an 18 percent higher chance of death. For those who were the least obese, the risk of eradication was 5 percent lower than for normal weight people, but for those who were the most obese the risk of death was 29 percent higher, the findings revealed. While the workroom found an association between weight and premature expiration risk, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.
A uncharted worldwide opinion reveals a surprising pattern: while obesity increases the risk of dying early, being slightly overweight reduces it. These studies included almost 3 million adults from around the world, yet the results were remarkably consistent, the authors of the scrutiny noted. "For populate with a medical condition, survival is slight better for people who are slightly heavier," said study author Katherine Flegal, a older research scientist at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics.
Several factors may narrative for this finding. "Maybe heavier people present to the doctor earlier, or get screened more often. Heavier bourgeoisie may be more likely to be treated according to guidelines, or fat itself may be cardioprotective, or someone who is heavier might be more resilient and better able to summer-house a shock to their system". The report was published Jan. 2 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
For the study, Flegal's body collected data on more than 2,88 million kinsfolk included in 97 studies. These studies were done in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia, China, Taiwan, Japan, Brazil, Israel, India and Mexico. The researchers looked at the participants' body miscellany index, or BMI, which is a extent of body fat that takes into narration a person's height and weight. Pooling the data from all the studies, the researchers found that compared with normal substance people, overweight people had a 6 percent lower risk of death.
Obese people, however, had an 18 percent higher chance of death. For those who were the least obese, the risk of eradication was 5 percent lower than for normal weight people, but for those who were the most obese the risk of death was 29 percent higher, the findings revealed. While the workroom found an association between weight and premature expiration risk, it did not prove a cause-and-effect relationship.
Skiing Prolongs Life
Skiing Prolongs Life.
Hitting the slopes soon? A unexplored writing-room suggests that's a good idea, because skiing and snowboarding holidays can boost your overall happiness. Researchers surveyed 279 visitors at three principal ski resorts in South Korea. Of those people, 126 were skiers, 112 were snowboarders and 41 did both. Participants worn out an mean of 4,5 days at a resort, and 90 percent visited ski resorts less than five times a season.
Hitting the slopes soon? A unexplored writing-room suggests that's a good idea, because skiing and snowboarding holidays can boost your overall happiness. Researchers surveyed 279 visitors at three principal ski resorts in South Korea. Of those people, 126 were skiers, 112 were snowboarders and 41 did both. Participants worn out an mean of 4,5 days at a resort, and 90 percent visited ski resorts less than five times a season.
A Tan Is Still Admired By Ignoring The Danger Of Cancer
A Tan Is Still Admired By Ignoring The Danger Of Cancer.
Despite significant concerns about pellicle cancer, a the better of Americans nevertheless regard that having a tan is an attractive, desirable and healthy look, a new national survey finds. The enumerate was conducted by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) in January, and included just over 7100 men and women nationwide. "Our enquiry highlighted the contradictory feelings that many people have about tanning - they love the way a tan looks but are concerned about skin cancer, which is estimated to choose about one in five Americans in their lifetime," Dr Zoe D Draelos, a dermatologist and consulting professor at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham NC, said in a telecast release.
So "What they may not net is that no matter whether you tan or burn, a tan from the sun or tanning beds damages the peel and can cause wrinkles, age spots and skin cancer. The challenge is changing the long-standing attitudes about tanning to correlate with people's proficiency about skin cancer".
Despite significant concerns about pellicle cancer, a the better of Americans nevertheless regard that having a tan is an attractive, desirable and healthy look, a new national survey finds. The enumerate was conducted by the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) in January, and included just over 7100 men and women nationwide. "Our enquiry highlighted the contradictory feelings that many people have about tanning - they love the way a tan looks but are concerned about skin cancer, which is estimated to choose about one in five Americans in their lifetime," Dr Zoe D Draelos, a dermatologist and consulting professor at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham NC, said in a telecast release.
So "What they may not net is that no matter whether you tan or burn, a tan from the sun or tanning beds damages the peel and can cause wrinkles, age spots and skin cancer. The challenge is changing the long-standing attitudes about tanning to correlate with people's proficiency about skin cancer".
Monday 6 January 2020
Americans Rarely Write Wills
Americans Rarely Write Wills.
Most Americans do not deal with end-of-life issues and wishes, a original lessons indicates. Researchers analyzed data from nearly 8000 people who took break up in nationwide surveys conducted in 2009 and 2010, and found that only about 26 percent had completed an advance directive, also called a living will. There were significant associations between completing an go forward directive and age, income, knowledge and health status, according to the study in the January issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Advance directives were more hackneyed among women, whites, married people and those who had a college degree or postgraduate training. People with advanced directives also were more inclined to to have a chronic disease or a regular source of care. "For raven and Hispanic respondents, advance directives were less frequent across all educational groups.
Most Americans do not deal with end-of-life issues and wishes, a original lessons indicates. Researchers analyzed data from nearly 8000 people who took break up in nationwide surveys conducted in 2009 and 2010, and found that only about 26 percent had completed an advance directive, also called a living will. There were significant associations between completing an go forward directive and age, income, knowledge and health status, according to the study in the January issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Advance directives were more hackneyed among women, whites, married people and those who had a college degree or postgraduate training. People with advanced directives also were more inclined to to have a chronic disease or a regular source of care. "For raven and Hispanic respondents, advance directives were less frequent across all educational groups.
Thursday 2 January 2020
Preparation For Colonoscopy As A Tablet Relieves Suffering From The Procedure
Preparation For Colonoscopy As A Tablet Relieves Suffering From The Procedure.
One saneness many colonize dread a colonoscopy is the unpleasant preparation, which often requires that they liquid refreshment a gallon of prescribed fluids to clear out their bowels before the procedure. But an industry-funded haunt suggests that a pill could negate the need for so much liquid. Researchers from Henry Ford Hospital story that people preparing for the test were able to take a pill approved as a treatment for chronic constipation and keep off half of the liquid requirement.
In the study, 126 people took either the pill - lubiprostone (Amitiza) - or an sluggish placebo. Those who took the combination of the pill and liquid were better able to suffer the preparation than were those who drank a gallon of a mixture of polyethylene glycol and electrolytes, the study found. "Most bourgeoisie say they don't want to have a colonoscopy because they find the preparation intolerable," the study's lead author, Dr Chetan Pai, a gastroenterologist, said in a telecast release from the hospital.
So "If physicians are able to present oneself a better way to prep, I think this will encourage more people to get the colonoscopies that may save their lives". Pai also spiked out that about 90 percent of colon cancer cases occur in people older than 50, an majority group that tends to have an especially hard time drinking the gallon of liquid often prescribed for colonoscopy preparation. The study, scheduled to be presented Sunday at the Digestive Diseases Week seminar in New Orleans, was funded by the pill's industrialist Sucampo Pharmaceuticals.
A colonoscopy is an internal exam of the colon (large intestine) and rectum, using an instrument called a colonoscope. How the Test is Performed. The colonoscope has a minute camera attached to a flexible tube. Unlike sigmoidoscopy, which can only stir the lower third of the colon, colonoscopy examines the entire length of the colon.
One saneness many colonize dread a colonoscopy is the unpleasant preparation, which often requires that they liquid refreshment a gallon of prescribed fluids to clear out their bowels before the procedure. But an industry-funded haunt suggests that a pill could negate the need for so much liquid. Researchers from Henry Ford Hospital story that people preparing for the test were able to take a pill approved as a treatment for chronic constipation and keep off half of the liquid requirement.
In the study, 126 people took either the pill - lubiprostone (Amitiza) - or an sluggish placebo. Those who took the combination of the pill and liquid were better able to suffer the preparation than were those who drank a gallon of a mixture of polyethylene glycol and electrolytes, the study found. "Most bourgeoisie say they don't want to have a colonoscopy because they find the preparation intolerable," the study's lead author, Dr Chetan Pai, a gastroenterologist, said in a telecast release from the hospital.
So "If physicians are able to present oneself a better way to prep, I think this will encourage more people to get the colonoscopies that may save their lives". Pai also spiked out that about 90 percent of colon cancer cases occur in people older than 50, an majority group that tends to have an especially hard time drinking the gallon of liquid often prescribed for colonoscopy preparation. The study, scheduled to be presented Sunday at the Digestive Diseases Week seminar in New Orleans, was funded by the pill's industrialist Sucampo Pharmaceuticals.
A colonoscopy is an internal exam of the colon (large intestine) and rectum, using an instrument called a colonoscope. How the Test is Performed. The colonoscope has a minute camera attached to a flexible tube. Unlike sigmoidoscopy, which can only stir the lower third of the colon, colonoscopy examines the entire length of the colon.
Wednesday 1 January 2020
Pain Is A Harbinger Of The Last Months Of Life At Half The Elderly
Pain Is A Harbinger Of The Last Months Of Life At Half The Elderly.
Pain is a commonly reported earmark during the pattern few years of life, with reports of cramp increasing during the final few months, a new study has shown. Just over a fourth of multitude reported being "troubled" by moderate or severe pain two years before they died, the researchers found. At four months before death, that add had jumped to nearly half. "This swotting shows that there's a substantial burden of pain at the end of life, and not just the very end of life," said the study's move author, Dr Alexander K Smith, an assistant professor of panacea at the University of California, San Francisco, and a staff physician at the San Francisco VA Medical Center.
And "Arthritis was the unique biggest predictor of pain". Results of the study are published in the Nov 2, 2010 edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine. Smith and his co-authors pointed out that numerous studies have been done on annoyance associated with specific conditions, such as cancer, but that theirs may be the first to address woe from all conditions toward the end of life, a time when most people would say that being pain-free is a priority.
The study included dope on more than 4700 people who died while participating in a study of older adults called the Health and Retirement Study. The mug up participants averaged 76 years old, included marginally more men than women and were mostly (83 percent) white. Every two years, they were asked if they were troubled by pain. If they answered yes, they were asked to classify their pain as mild, moderate or severe.
Pain is a commonly reported earmark during the pattern few years of life, with reports of cramp increasing during the final few months, a new study has shown. Just over a fourth of multitude reported being "troubled" by moderate or severe pain two years before they died, the researchers found. At four months before death, that add had jumped to nearly half. "This swotting shows that there's a substantial burden of pain at the end of life, and not just the very end of life," said the study's move author, Dr Alexander K Smith, an assistant professor of panacea at the University of California, San Francisco, and a staff physician at the San Francisco VA Medical Center.
And "Arthritis was the unique biggest predictor of pain". Results of the study are published in the Nov 2, 2010 edition of the Annals of Internal Medicine. Smith and his co-authors pointed out that numerous studies have been done on annoyance associated with specific conditions, such as cancer, but that theirs may be the first to address woe from all conditions toward the end of life, a time when most people would say that being pain-free is a priority.
The study included dope on more than 4700 people who died while participating in a study of older adults called the Health and Retirement Study. The mug up participants averaged 76 years old, included marginally more men than women and were mostly (83 percent) white. Every two years, they were asked if they were troubled by pain. If they answered yes, they were asked to classify their pain as mild, moderate or severe.
Monday 30 December 2019
Mobile Communication Has Become A Part Of The Lives Of Students
Mobile Communication Has Become A Part Of The Lives Of Students.
Ever be aware a bit addicted to your cellphone? A new scrutiny suggests that college students who can't keep their hands off their mobile devices - "high-frequency cellphone users" - piece higher levels of anxiety, less satisfaction with life and soften grades than peers who use their cellphones less frequently. If you're not college age, you're not off the hook. The researchers said the results may administer to people of all ages who have grown accustomed to using cellphones regularly, heyday and night. "People need to make a conscious decision to unplug from the perennial barrage of electronic media and pursue something else," said Jacob Barkley, a research co-author and associate professor at Kent State University.
And "There could be a substantial anxiety benefit". But that's easier said than done especially surrounded by students who are accustomed to being in constant communication with their friends. "The facer is that the device is always in your pocket". The researchers became interested in the question of anxiety and productivity when they were doing a study, published in July, which found that tubby cellphone use was associated with lower levels of fitness.
Issues interconnected to anxiety seemed to be associated with those who used the mobile device the most. For this study, published online and in the upcoming February climax of Computers in Human Behavior, the researchers surveyed about 500 man's and female students at Kent State University. The study authors captured cellphone and texting use, and utilized established questionnaires about anxiety and life satisfaction, or happiness.
Participants, who were equally distributed by year in college, allowed the investigators to access their recognized university records to grasp their cumulative college grade point average (GPA). The students represented 82 special fields of study. Questions examining cellphone use asked students to value the total amount of time they spent using their mobile phone each day, including calling, texting, using Facebook, checking email, sending photos, gaming, surfing the Internet, watching videos, and tapping all other uses driven by apps and software.
Time listening to music was excluded. On average, students reported spending 279 minutes - almost five hours - a hour using their cellphones and sending 77 school-book messages a day. The researchers said this is the elementary bone up to constituent cellphone use with a validated measure of anxiety with a wide range of cellphone users. Within this illustrative of typical college students, as cellphone use increased, so did anxiety.
Ever be aware a bit addicted to your cellphone? A new scrutiny suggests that college students who can't keep their hands off their mobile devices - "high-frequency cellphone users" - piece higher levels of anxiety, less satisfaction with life and soften grades than peers who use their cellphones less frequently. If you're not college age, you're not off the hook. The researchers said the results may administer to people of all ages who have grown accustomed to using cellphones regularly, heyday and night. "People need to make a conscious decision to unplug from the perennial barrage of electronic media and pursue something else," said Jacob Barkley, a research co-author and associate professor at Kent State University.
And "There could be a substantial anxiety benefit". But that's easier said than done especially surrounded by students who are accustomed to being in constant communication with their friends. "The facer is that the device is always in your pocket". The researchers became interested in the question of anxiety and productivity when they were doing a study, published in July, which found that tubby cellphone use was associated with lower levels of fitness.
Issues interconnected to anxiety seemed to be associated with those who used the mobile device the most. For this study, published online and in the upcoming February climax of Computers in Human Behavior, the researchers surveyed about 500 man's and female students at Kent State University. The study authors captured cellphone and texting use, and utilized established questionnaires about anxiety and life satisfaction, or happiness.
Participants, who were equally distributed by year in college, allowed the investigators to access their recognized university records to grasp their cumulative college grade point average (GPA). The students represented 82 special fields of study. Questions examining cellphone use asked students to value the total amount of time they spent using their mobile phone each day, including calling, texting, using Facebook, checking email, sending photos, gaming, surfing the Internet, watching videos, and tapping all other uses driven by apps and software.
Time listening to music was excluded. On average, students reported spending 279 minutes - almost five hours - a hour using their cellphones and sending 77 school-book messages a day. The researchers said this is the elementary bone up to constituent cellphone use with a validated measure of anxiety with a wide range of cellphone users. Within this illustrative of typical college students, as cellphone use increased, so did anxiety.
Sunday 29 December 2019
Depression May Worsen Obesity
Depression May Worsen Obesity.
New study provides more evidence of a identify with between depression and extra pounds around the waist, although it's not exactly clear how they're connected. The mull over raises the possibility that depression causes people to put on extra pounds around the belly. The antithesis doesn't appear to be the case: researchers found that overweight people aren't more likely to become depressed than their normal-weight peers.
These findings come from researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who examined evidence from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA), a 20-year longitudinal swat of more than 5100 men and women old 18-30. Longitudinal studies look for a link between cause and effect by observing a association of individuals at regular intervals over a long period of time.
New study provides more evidence of a identify with between depression and extra pounds around the waist, although it's not exactly clear how they're connected. The mull over raises the possibility that depression causes people to put on extra pounds around the belly. The antithesis doesn't appear to be the case: researchers found that overweight people aren't more likely to become depressed than their normal-weight peers.
These findings come from researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, who examined evidence from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study (CARDIA), a 20-year longitudinal swat of more than 5100 men and women old 18-30. Longitudinal studies look for a link between cause and effect by observing a association of individuals at regular intervals over a long period of time.
Tuesday 24 December 2019
New Research In The Treatment Of Cancer Of Immune System
New Research In The Treatment Of Cancer Of Immune System.
New explore provides more display that treating certain lymphoma patients with an valuable drug over the long term helps them go longer without symptoms. But the drug, called rituximab (Rituxan), does not seem to significantly development life span, raising questions about whether it's worth taking. People with lymphoma who are in maintenance treatment "really need a discussion with their oncologist," said Dr Steven T Rosen, cicerone of the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University in Chicago. The contemplation involved people with follicular lymphoma, one of the milder forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a locution that refers to cancers of the immune system.
Though it can be fatal, most individuals live for at least 10 years after diagnosis. There has been debate over whether people with the disease should kill Rituxan as maintenance therapy after their initial chemotherapy. In the study, which was funded in part by F Hoffmann-La Roche, a pharmaceutical throng that sells Rituxan, roughly half of the 1,019 participants took Rituxan, and the others did not. All at one time had taken the drug right after receiving chemotherapy.
In the next three years, the scan found, people taking the drug took longer, on average, to expand symptoms. Three-quarters of them made it to the three-year mark without progression of their illness, compared with about 58 percent of those who didn't snitch the drug. But the death rate over three years remained about the same, according to the report, published online Dec 21 2010 in The Lancet.
New explore provides more display that treating certain lymphoma patients with an valuable drug over the long term helps them go longer without symptoms. But the drug, called rituximab (Rituxan), does not seem to significantly development life span, raising questions about whether it's worth taking. People with lymphoma who are in maintenance treatment "really need a discussion with their oncologist," said Dr Steven T Rosen, cicerone of the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University in Chicago. The contemplation involved people with follicular lymphoma, one of the milder forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a locution that refers to cancers of the immune system.
Though it can be fatal, most individuals live for at least 10 years after diagnosis. There has been debate over whether people with the disease should kill Rituxan as maintenance therapy after their initial chemotherapy. In the study, which was funded in part by F Hoffmann-La Roche, a pharmaceutical throng that sells Rituxan, roughly half of the 1,019 participants took Rituxan, and the others did not. All at one time had taken the drug right after receiving chemotherapy.
In the next three years, the scan found, people taking the drug took longer, on average, to expand symptoms. Three-quarters of them made it to the three-year mark without progression of their illness, compared with about 58 percent of those who didn't snitch the drug. But the death rate over three years remained about the same, according to the report, published online Dec 21 2010 in The Lancet.
In Different Life Years Self-Esteem Varies Considerably
In Different Life Years Self-Esteem Varies Considerably.
Self-esteem increases as the crowd fructify older, but dips when people are in their 60s, although those who make more money and are healthier favour to retain better views of themselves, researchers have found. In the study, published in the April copy of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, researchers surveyed 3617 US adults grey 25 to 104, trying to reach all of them four times between 1986 and 2002.
So "Self-esteem is interrelated to better health, less criminal behavior, lower levels of depression and, overall, greater ascendancy in life," the study's lead author, Ulrich Orth, said in a news release from the American Psychological Association. "Therefore, it's urgent to learn more about how the average person's self-esteem changes over time".
Young commonality had the lowest self-esteem, but it grew as people aged, peaking at about age 60. Women had cut self-esteem than men, on average, until they reached their 80s and 90s, the study authors found.
Wealth and salubriousness played major roles in boosting self-esteem, especially in older people. "Specifically, we found that masses who have higher incomes and better health in later life tend to maintain their self-esteem as they age. We cannot be informed for certain that more wealth and better health directly lead to higher self-esteem, but it does appear to be linked in some way.
For example, it is imaginable that wealth and health are related to feeling more independent and better able to contribute to one's descent and society, which in turn bolsters self-esteem". As to why self-esteem peaks in middle-age and then often drops as populace get older, the researchers suggested several theories.
Self-esteem increases as the crowd fructify older, but dips when people are in their 60s, although those who make more money and are healthier favour to retain better views of themselves, researchers have found. In the study, published in the April copy of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, researchers surveyed 3617 US adults grey 25 to 104, trying to reach all of them four times between 1986 and 2002.
So "Self-esteem is interrelated to better health, less criminal behavior, lower levels of depression and, overall, greater ascendancy in life," the study's lead author, Ulrich Orth, said in a news release from the American Psychological Association. "Therefore, it's urgent to learn more about how the average person's self-esteem changes over time".
Young commonality had the lowest self-esteem, but it grew as people aged, peaking at about age 60. Women had cut self-esteem than men, on average, until they reached their 80s and 90s, the study authors found.
Wealth and salubriousness played major roles in boosting self-esteem, especially in older people. "Specifically, we found that masses who have higher incomes and better health in later life tend to maintain their self-esteem as they age. We cannot be informed for certain that more wealth and better health directly lead to higher self-esteem, but it does appear to be linked in some way.
For example, it is imaginable that wealth and health are related to feeling more independent and better able to contribute to one's descent and society, which in turn bolsters self-esteem". As to why self-esteem peaks in middle-age and then often drops as populace get older, the researchers suggested several theories.
Monday 23 December 2019
Saving Lives With Hemostatic Medicine
Saving Lives With Hemostatic Medicine.
A narcotize commonly employed to prevent excess bleeding in surgeries could keep thousands of people from bleeding to death after trauma, a unique study suggests. The drug, tranexamic acid (TXA) is cheap, greatly available around the world and easily administered. It works by significantly reducing the rate at which blood clots flout down, the researchers explained. "When people have serious injuries, whether from accidents or violence, and when they have fierce hemorrhage they can bleed to death.
This treatment reduces the chances of bleeding to death by about a sixth," said researcher Dr Ian Roberts, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in the UK. According to Roberts, each year about 600000 society bleed to demise worldwide. "So, if you could bring down that by a sixth, you've saved 100000 lives in one year".
The report, which was on the whole funded by philanthropic groups and the British government, is published in the June 15 online issue of The Lancet. For the study, Roberts and colleagues in the CRASH-2 consortium randomly assigned more than 20000 trauma patients from 274 hospitals across 40 countries to injections of either TXA or placebo.
Among patients receiving TXA, the pace of expiry from any cause was cut by 10 percent compared to patients receiving placebo, the researchers found. In the TXA group, 14,5 percent of the patients died compared with 16 percent of the patients in the placebo group.
A narcotize commonly employed to prevent excess bleeding in surgeries could keep thousands of people from bleeding to death after trauma, a unique study suggests. The drug, tranexamic acid (TXA) is cheap, greatly available around the world and easily administered. It works by significantly reducing the rate at which blood clots flout down, the researchers explained. "When people have serious injuries, whether from accidents or violence, and when they have fierce hemorrhage they can bleed to death.
This treatment reduces the chances of bleeding to death by about a sixth," said researcher Dr Ian Roberts, a professor of epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine in the UK. According to Roberts, each year about 600000 society bleed to demise worldwide. "So, if you could bring down that by a sixth, you've saved 100000 lives in one year".
The report, which was on the whole funded by philanthropic groups and the British government, is published in the June 15 online issue of The Lancet. For the study, Roberts and colleagues in the CRASH-2 consortium randomly assigned more than 20000 trauma patients from 274 hospitals across 40 countries to injections of either TXA or placebo.
Among patients receiving TXA, the pace of expiry from any cause was cut by 10 percent compared to patients receiving placebo, the researchers found. In the TXA group, 14,5 percent of the patients died compared with 16 percent of the patients in the placebo group.
Very Few People Know How To Protect Yourself From Skin Cancer
Very Few People Know How To Protect Yourself From Skin Cancer.
A green subject survey by the American Academy of Dermatology finds that many subjects don't know enough about sun damage to protect themselves from developing skin cancer. "Our inspection showed that despite our repeated warnings about the dangers of UV exposure and the importance of proper Sunna protection, many people could not correctly answer true/false statements on the subject," said dermatologist Dr Zoe D Draelos, consulting professor at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, NC, in a report release.
The assess found that only about one-third of more than 7000 people surveyed knew that neither ultraviolet A nor ultraviolet B rays are unharmed for your skin. "Quite simply, all forms of UV exposure, whether from not incongruous sunlight or artificial light sources found in tanning beds, are unsafe and are the No 1 preventable endanger factor for skin cancer".
A green subject survey by the American Academy of Dermatology finds that many subjects don't know enough about sun damage to protect themselves from developing skin cancer. "Our inspection showed that despite our repeated warnings about the dangers of UV exposure and the importance of proper Sunna protection, many people could not correctly answer true/false statements on the subject," said dermatologist Dr Zoe D Draelos, consulting professor at Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, NC, in a report release.
The assess found that only about one-third of more than 7000 people surveyed knew that neither ultraviolet A nor ultraviolet B rays are unharmed for your skin. "Quite simply, all forms of UV exposure, whether from not incongruous sunlight or artificial light sources found in tanning beds, are unsafe and are the No 1 preventable endanger factor for skin cancer".
Sunday 22 December 2019
Living With HIV For People Over 50 Years
Living With HIV For People Over 50 Years.
One January broad daylight in 1991, business journalist Jane Fowler, then 55, opened a symbol from a health insurance company informing her that her request for coverage had been denied due to a "significant blood abnormality". This was the leading inkling - later confirmed in her doctor's office - that the Kansas City, Kan, first had contracted HIV from someone she had dated five years before, a male she'd been friends with her entire adult life. She had begun seeing him two years after the end of her 24-year marriage.
Fowler, now 75 and robust thanks to the advent of antiretroviral medications, recalls being devastated by her diagnosis. "I went deeply that day and literally took to my bed. I thought, 'What's successful to happen?'" she said. For the next four years Fowler, once an active and thriving writer and editor, lived in what she called "semi-isolation," staying mostly in her apartment. Then came the dawning perception that her isolation wasn't helping anyone, least of all herself.
Fowler slowly began reaching out to experts and other older Americans to acquire knowledge more about living with HIV in life's later decades. By 1995, she had helped co-found the National Association on HIV Over 50. And through her program, HIV Wisdom for Older Women, Fowler today speaks to audiences nationwide on the challenges of living with the virus. "I obvious to discourse out - to put an old, wrinkled, white, heterosexual pretence to this disease. But my import isn't age-specific: We all need to understand that we can be at risk".
That point may be more urgent than ever this Wednesday, World AIDS Day. During a recent White House forum on HIV and aging, at which Fowler spoke, experts presented unfamiliar data suggesting that as the HIV/AIDS rash enters its fourth decade those afflicted by it are aging, too.
One report, conducted by the AIDS Community Research Initiative of America (ACRIA), esteemed that 27 percent of Americans diagnosed with HIV are now age-old 50 or older and by 2015 that percentage could double. Why? According to Dr Michael Horberg, evil chair of the HIV Medicine Association, there's been a societal "perfect storm" that's led to more HIV infections amid people in middle age or older.
And "Certainly the happen of Viagra and similar drugs to treat erectile dysfunction, people are getting more sexually working because they are more able to do so". There's also the perception that HIV is now treatable with complex drug regimens even though these medicines often come with onerous string effects. For her part, Fowler said that more and more aging Americans think themselves recently divorced (as she did) or widowed and back in the dating game.
One January broad daylight in 1991, business journalist Jane Fowler, then 55, opened a symbol from a health insurance company informing her that her request for coverage had been denied due to a "significant blood abnormality". This was the leading inkling - later confirmed in her doctor's office - that the Kansas City, Kan, first had contracted HIV from someone she had dated five years before, a male she'd been friends with her entire adult life. She had begun seeing him two years after the end of her 24-year marriage.
Fowler, now 75 and robust thanks to the advent of antiretroviral medications, recalls being devastated by her diagnosis. "I went deeply that day and literally took to my bed. I thought, 'What's successful to happen?'" she said. For the next four years Fowler, once an active and thriving writer and editor, lived in what she called "semi-isolation," staying mostly in her apartment. Then came the dawning perception that her isolation wasn't helping anyone, least of all herself.
Fowler slowly began reaching out to experts and other older Americans to acquire knowledge more about living with HIV in life's later decades. By 1995, she had helped co-found the National Association on HIV Over 50. And through her program, HIV Wisdom for Older Women, Fowler today speaks to audiences nationwide on the challenges of living with the virus. "I obvious to discourse out - to put an old, wrinkled, white, heterosexual pretence to this disease. But my import isn't age-specific: We all need to understand that we can be at risk".
That point may be more urgent than ever this Wednesday, World AIDS Day. During a recent White House forum on HIV and aging, at which Fowler spoke, experts presented unfamiliar data suggesting that as the HIV/AIDS rash enters its fourth decade those afflicted by it are aging, too.
One report, conducted by the AIDS Community Research Initiative of America (ACRIA), esteemed that 27 percent of Americans diagnosed with HIV are now age-old 50 or older and by 2015 that percentage could double. Why? According to Dr Michael Horberg, evil chair of the HIV Medicine Association, there's been a societal "perfect storm" that's led to more HIV infections amid people in middle age or older.
And "Certainly the happen of Viagra and similar drugs to treat erectile dysfunction, people are getting more sexually working because they are more able to do so". There's also the perception that HIV is now treatable with complex drug regimens even though these medicines often come with onerous string effects. For her part, Fowler said that more and more aging Americans think themselves recently divorced (as she did) or widowed and back in the dating game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)