Excessive Use Of Antibiotics In Animal Husbandry Creates A Deadly Intestinal Bacteria.
The make an effort of E coli bacteria that this month killed dozens of populate in Europe and sickened thousands more may be more brutal because of the way it has evolved, a new swot suggests. Scientists say this strain of E coli produces a particularly noxious toxin and also has a gluey ability to hold on to cells within the intestine. This, alongside the fact that it is also resistant to many antibiotics, has made the ostensible O104:H4 strain both deadlier and easier to transmit, German researchers report.
And "This ancestry of E coli is much nastier than its more common cousin E coli O157, which is spiteful enough - about three times more virulent," said Hugh Pennington, emeritus professor of bacteriology at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland and originator of an accompanying editorial published online June 23, 2011 in The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Another study, published the same prime in the New England Journal of Medicine, concludes that, as of June 18, 2011, more than 3200 common people have fallen trouble in Germany due to the outbreak, including 39 deaths.
In fact, the German descent - traced to sprouts raised at a German organic farm - "was honest for the deadliest E coli outbreak in history. It may well be so nasty because it combines the virulence factors of shiga toxin, produced by E coli O157, and the workings for sticking to intestinal cells second-hand by another strain of E coli, enteroaggregative E coli, which is known to be an important cause of diarrhea in poorer countries".
Shiga toxin can also worker spur what doctors call "hemolytic uremic syndrome," a potentially disastrous form of kidney failure. In the New England Journal of Medicine study, German researchers approximately that 25 percent of outbreak cases involved this complication. The bottom line, according to Pennington: "E coli hasn't gone away. It still springs surprises".
To upon out how this overburden of the intestinal bug proved so lethal, researchers led by Dr Helge Karch from the University of Munster feigned 80 samples of the bacteria from affected patients. They tested the samples for shiga toxin-producing E coli and also for perniciousness genes of other types of E coli.
Showing posts with label antibiotics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label antibiotics. Show all posts
Tuesday 31 December 2019
Thursday 28 November 2019
Allergic To Penicillin May Not Apply To Related Antibiotics
Allergic To Penicillin May Not Apply To Related Antibiotics.
Most patients who have a antiquity of penicillin allergy can safely receive antibiotics called cephalosporins, researchers say. Cephalosporins - which are joint to penicillin in their structure, uses and effects - are the most c oftentimes prescribed class of antibiotics.
So "Almost all patients undergoing major surgery find out antibiotics to reduce the risk of infections. Many patients with a history of penicillin allergy don't get the cephalosporin because of a involvement of possible drug reaction.
They might get a second-choice antibiotic that is not quite as effective," boning up author Dr James T Li, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, said in a despatch release from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. He and his colleagues conducted penicillin allergy decorticate tests on 178 patients who reported a history of unadorned allergic (anaphylactic) reaction to penicillin.
Most patients who have a antiquity of penicillin allergy can safely receive antibiotics called cephalosporins, researchers say. Cephalosporins - which are joint to penicillin in their structure, uses and effects - are the most c oftentimes prescribed class of antibiotics.
So "Almost all patients undergoing major surgery find out antibiotics to reduce the risk of infections. Many patients with a history of penicillin allergy don't get the cephalosporin because of a involvement of possible drug reaction.
They might get a second-choice antibiotic that is not quite as effective," boning up author Dr James T Li, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn, said in a despatch release from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. He and his colleagues conducted penicillin allergy decorticate tests on 178 patients who reported a history of unadorned allergic (anaphylactic) reaction to penicillin.
Thursday 16 November 2017
Awareness Against The Global Problem Of Antibiotic Resistance
Awareness Against The Global Problem Of Antibiotic Resistance.
Knowing when to play antibiotics - and when not to - can worker fight the rise of deadly "superbugs," about experts at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About half of antibiotics prescribed are expendable or inappropriate, the agency says, and overuse has helped create bacteria that don't respond, or rejoin less effectively, to the drugs used to fight them. "Antibiotics are a shared resource that has become a few and far between resource," said Dr Lauri Hicks, a medical epidemiologist at the CDC.
She's also medical manager a of new program, Get Smart: Know When Antibiotics Work, that had its launch this week. "Everyone has a situation to play in preventing the spread of antibiotic resistance". The stakes are high, said Dr Arjun Srinivasan, CDC's affiliated director for health care-associated infection barring programs. Almost every type of bacteria has become stronger and less responsive to antibiotic treatment.
The CDC is urging Americans to use the drugs decently to help prevent the global problem of antibiotic resistance. To that end, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), numerous resident medical and controlled associations, as well as state and local health departments have collaborated on the CDC's Get Smart initiative.
Most strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are still found in form care settings, such as hospitals and nursing homes. Yet superbugs, including MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) - which kills about 19000 Americans a year - are increasingly found in community settings, such as haleness clubs, schools, and workplaces, said Hicks.
Community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), a purify that affects nutritious people outside of hospitals, made headlines in 2008, when it killed a Florida costly school football player. Referring to new reports of sinusitis caused by MRSA, Hicks said that "people who would normally be treated with an pronounced antibiotic are requiring more toxic medications or, in some instances, admission to a hospital. We've seen this with pneumonia, too, and I problem we'll start to see it with other types of infections as well".
Knowing when to play antibiotics - and when not to - can worker fight the rise of deadly "superbugs," about experts at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About half of antibiotics prescribed are expendable or inappropriate, the agency says, and overuse has helped create bacteria that don't respond, or rejoin less effectively, to the drugs used to fight them. "Antibiotics are a shared resource that has become a few and far between resource," said Dr Lauri Hicks, a medical epidemiologist at the CDC.
She's also medical manager a of new program, Get Smart: Know When Antibiotics Work, that had its launch this week. "Everyone has a situation to play in preventing the spread of antibiotic resistance". The stakes are high, said Dr Arjun Srinivasan, CDC's affiliated director for health care-associated infection barring programs. Almost every type of bacteria has become stronger and less responsive to antibiotic treatment.
The CDC is urging Americans to use the drugs decently to help prevent the global problem of antibiotic resistance. To that end, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), numerous resident medical and controlled associations, as well as state and local health departments have collaborated on the CDC's Get Smart initiative.
Most strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria are still found in form care settings, such as hospitals and nursing homes. Yet superbugs, including MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) - which kills about 19000 Americans a year - are increasingly found in community settings, such as haleness clubs, schools, and workplaces, said Hicks.
Community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), a purify that affects nutritious people outside of hospitals, made headlines in 2008, when it killed a Florida costly school football player. Referring to new reports of sinusitis caused by MRSA, Hicks said that "people who would normally be treated with an pronounced antibiotic are requiring more toxic medications or, in some instances, admission to a hospital. We've seen this with pneumonia, too, and I problem we'll start to see it with other types of infections as well".
Sunday 12 February 2017
In Most Cases, A Cough Caused By Viruses, And Antibiotics To Treat It Impractical
In Most Cases, A Cough Caused By Viruses, And Antibiotics To Treat It Impractical.
You've been hacking and coughing for a week now - isn't it day that the cough was through? Sadly, the fulfil is often "no," and experts report in that many man have a mistaken idea of how long an acute cough should last. This misconception can lead to the supererogatory (and, for public safety, dangerous) overuse of antibiotics, a new study finds. "No one wants or likes a slow cough.
Patients simply want to get rid of it," said Dr Robert Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "After back-breaking over-the-counter regimens for about a week, they seize their doctors with the hopes of obtaining a prescription antibiotic for a self-limited working order that is usually caused by viruses," which do not respond to antibiotics who was not involved in the new study.
So how prolonged does the average acute cough really last? The team of researchers from the University of Georgia, in Athens, reviewed medical circulars and found that the average duration of an acute cough is nearly three weeks (17,8 days). They then surveyed nearly 500 adults and found that they reported that their cough lasted an commonplace of seven to nine days. And if a unswerving believes an acute cough should last about a week, they are more acceptable to ask their doctor for antibiotics after five to six days of having a cough, the researchers noted.
You've been hacking and coughing for a week now - isn't it day that the cough was through? Sadly, the fulfil is often "no," and experts report in that many man have a mistaken idea of how long an acute cough should last. This misconception can lead to the supererogatory (and, for public safety, dangerous) overuse of antibiotics, a new study finds. "No one wants or likes a slow cough.
Patients simply want to get rid of it," said Dr Robert Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "After back-breaking over-the-counter regimens for about a week, they seize their doctors with the hopes of obtaining a prescription antibiotic for a self-limited working order that is usually caused by viruses," which do not respond to antibiotics who was not involved in the new study.
So how prolonged does the average acute cough really last? The team of researchers from the University of Georgia, in Athens, reviewed medical circulars and found that the average duration of an acute cough is nearly three weeks (17,8 days). They then surveyed nearly 500 adults and found that they reported that their cough lasted an commonplace of seven to nine days. And if a unswerving believes an acute cough should last about a week, they are more acceptable to ask their doctor for antibiotics after five to six days of having a cough, the researchers noted.
Tuesday 24 January 2017
Risks And Benefits Of Treatment Kids' Ear Infections With Antibiotics
Risks And Benefits Of Treatment Kids' Ear Infections With Antibiotics.
Antibiotics may servant more children with on the qui vive ear infections recover quickly, but the drugs also come with the endanger of side effects, concludes a new analysis of previous research. Between 4 and 10 percent of children know side effects, such as diarrhea or rash, from antibiotic use, according to the analysis. "If you have 100 fit children with an acute ear infection, about 80 would get better with just over-the-counter pest and fever relief - but if you treated all 100 of those kids with antibiotics, you would quickly smoke 92 of them.
But, the number of children who would benefit is similar to the number of children who would experience stand effects like diarrhea and rash," explained the study's lead author, Dr Tumaini Coker, an aide-de-camp professor of pediatrics at the Mattel Children's Hospital and the David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles. "Parents genuinely have to weigh the risks and benefits of care when a child has an ear infection".
In addition to finding that early prescribing of antibiotics offers some improve in the treatment of ear infections, the researchers also found that newer, name-brand antibiotics didn't appear to be any more efficacious than old stand-bys, such as amoxicillin, which are often generic and less expensive. "Parents need to know that when a child gets an attention infection, antibiotic treatment might not always be the best option," said Coker, who is also a researcher at the RAND Corporation, a non-profit enquire institute. "And, for most healthy children with a newly diagnosed ear infection, we couldn't realize any evidence that newer antibiotics worked any better than older ones".
Acute ear infection (otitis media) is the most worn out reason that antibiotics are prescribed for children in the United States, according to CV information in the study. The average cost of an ear infection is $350 per child, which ends up costing the express health-care system about $2,8 billion annually.
Antibiotics may servant more children with on the qui vive ear infections recover quickly, but the drugs also come with the endanger of side effects, concludes a new analysis of previous research. Between 4 and 10 percent of children know side effects, such as diarrhea or rash, from antibiotic use, according to the analysis. "If you have 100 fit children with an acute ear infection, about 80 would get better with just over-the-counter pest and fever relief - but if you treated all 100 of those kids with antibiotics, you would quickly smoke 92 of them.
But, the number of children who would benefit is similar to the number of children who would experience stand effects like diarrhea and rash," explained the study's lead author, Dr Tumaini Coker, an aide-de-camp professor of pediatrics at the Mattel Children's Hospital and the David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles. "Parents genuinely have to weigh the risks and benefits of care when a child has an ear infection".
In addition to finding that early prescribing of antibiotics offers some improve in the treatment of ear infections, the researchers also found that newer, name-brand antibiotics didn't appear to be any more efficacious than old stand-bys, such as amoxicillin, which are often generic and less expensive. "Parents need to know that when a child gets an attention infection, antibiotic treatment might not always be the best option," said Coker, who is also a researcher at the RAND Corporation, a non-profit enquire institute. "And, for most healthy children with a newly diagnosed ear infection, we couldn't realize any evidence that newer antibiotics worked any better than older ones".
Acute ear infection (otitis media) is the most worn out reason that antibiotics are prescribed for children in the United States, according to CV information in the study. The average cost of an ear infection is $350 per child, which ends up costing the express health-care system about $2,8 billion annually.
Saturday 3 September 2016
Scientists Oppose The Use Of Antibiotics For Livestock Rearing
Scientists Oppose The Use Of Antibiotics For Livestock Rearing.
As experts pursue to substantial alarm bells about the rising resistance of microbes to antibiotics hand-me-down by humans, the United States Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday Dec 2013 announced it was curbing the use of the drugs in livestock nationwide. "FDA is issuing a outline today, in collaboration with the savage health industry, to phase out the use of medically important for treating human infections antimicrobials in grub animals for production purposes, such as to enhance growth rates and improve feeding efficiency," Michael Taylor, surrogate commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine at the agency, said during a Wednesday matutinal press briefing. Experts have long stressed that the overuse of antibiotics by the meat and poultry labour gives dangerous germs such as Staphylococcus and C difficile a prime breeding ground to emerge mutations around drugs often used by humans.
But for years, millions of doses of antibiotics have been added to the provide or water of cattle, poultry, hogs and other animals to produce fatter animals while using less feed. To hand at and limit this overuse, the FDA is asking pharmaceutical companies that make antibiotics for the husbandry industry to change the labels on their products to limit the use of these drugs to medical purposes only. At the same time, the means will be phasing in broader oversight by veterinarians to insure that the antibiotics are used only to scrutinize and prevent illness in animals and not to enhance growth.
And "What is voluntary is only the participation of animal pharmaceutical companies. Once these labeling changes have been made, these products will only be able to be second-hand for therapeutic reasons with veterinary oversight. With these changes, there will be fewer approved uses of these drugs and outstanding uses will be under tighter control". The most stale antibiotics used in feed and also prescribed for humans affected by the further rule include tetracycline, penicillin and the macrolides, according to the FDA.
Two companies, Zoetis (Pfizer's animal-drug subsidiary) and Elanco, have the largest appropriation of the animal antibiotic market. Both have said they will device on to the FDA's program. There was some initial praise for FDA's move. "We commend FDA for taking the elementary steps since 1977 to broadly reduce antibiotic overuse in livestock," Laura Rogers, who directs the Pew Charitable Trusts' considerate health and industrial farming campaign, said in a statement.
As experts pursue to substantial alarm bells about the rising resistance of microbes to antibiotics hand-me-down by humans, the United States Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday Dec 2013 announced it was curbing the use of the drugs in livestock nationwide. "FDA is issuing a outline today, in collaboration with the savage health industry, to phase out the use of medically important for treating human infections antimicrobials in grub animals for production purposes, such as to enhance growth rates and improve feeding efficiency," Michael Taylor, surrogate commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine at the agency, said during a Wednesday matutinal press briefing. Experts have long stressed that the overuse of antibiotics by the meat and poultry labour gives dangerous germs such as Staphylococcus and C difficile a prime breeding ground to emerge mutations around drugs often used by humans.
But for years, millions of doses of antibiotics have been added to the provide or water of cattle, poultry, hogs and other animals to produce fatter animals while using less feed. To hand at and limit this overuse, the FDA is asking pharmaceutical companies that make antibiotics for the husbandry industry to change the labels on their products to limit the use of these drugs to medical purposes only. At the same time, the means will be phasing in broader oversight by veterinarians to insure that the antibiotics are used only to scrutinize and prevent illness in animals and not to enhance growth.
And "What is voluntary is only the participation of animal pharmaceutical companies. Once these labeling changes have been made, these products will only be able to be second-hand for therapeutic reasons with veterinary oversight. With these changes, there will be fewer approved uses of these drugs and outstanding uses will be under tighter control". The most stale antibiotics used in feed and also prescribed for humans affected by the further rule include tetracycline, penicillin and the macrolides, according to the FDA.
Two companies, Zoetis (Pfizer's animal-drug subsidiary) and Elanco, have the largest appropriation of the animal antibiotic market. Both have said they will device on to the FDA's program. There was some initial praise for FDA's move. "We commend FDA for taking the elementary steps since 1977 to broadly reduce antibiotic overuse in livestock," Laura Rogers, who directs the Pew Charitable Trusts' considerate health and industrial farming campaign, said in a statement.
Sunday 17 July 2016
Gonorrhea Can Not Be Treated By Existing Antibiotics
Gonorrhea Can Not Be Treated By Existing Antibiotics.
The sexually transmitted disorder gonorrhea is comely increasingly resistant to available antibiotics, including the ultimate oral antibiotic used to treat the bacterium, new Canadian research shows. In a read of nearly 300 people infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the researchers found a treatment washout rate of nearly 7 percent in people treated with cefixime, the last available oral antibiotic for gonorrhea. "Gonorrhea is a bacterium that's unheard-of in its ability to mutate quickly, and we no longer have the same over-abundance of options anymore," said study author Dr Vanessa Allen, a medical microbiologist with Public Health Ontario in Toronto.
So "We penury to start thinking about how we give antibiotics in observation of a pipeline that's ending. I think gonorrhea will become a paradigm for drug resistance in general". Another masterful agreed. "We've been lucky. For quite some time, we've had treatments for gonorrhea that are simple, economy and effective, and a single dose," explained Dr Robert Kirkcaldy, a medical epidemiologist with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who wrote an essay accompanying the study. "But now we're on-going out of treatment options, and there's a very real possibility that there will be untreatable gonorrhea in the future.
This is a not joking public health crisis on the horizon". The CDC is so upset that the agency issued new treatment recommendations last August. The CDC advised doctors to end using cefixime to treat gonorrhea, and instead use the injectable antibiotic ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone is in the same birth of antibiotics as cefixime.
The CDC has also recommended that physicians closely monitor their patients to guarantee that the treatment is working, and to add a second class of antibiotics to treatment if they suspect the ceftriaxone injection hasn't knocked out the infection. Gonorrhea is an unusually common infection. More than 320000 cases were reported in the United States in 2011.
The sexually transmitted disorder gonorrhea is comely increasingly resistant to available antibiotics, including the ultimate oral antibiotic used to treat the bacterium, new Canadian research shows. In a read of nearly 300 people infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the researchers found a treatment washout rate of nearly 7 percent in people treated with cefixime, the last available oral antibiotic for gonorrhea. "Gonorrhea is a bacterium that's unheard-of in its ability to mutate quickly, and we no longer have the same over-abundance of options anymore," said study author Dr Vanessa Allen, a medical microbiologist with Public Health Ontario in Toronto.
So "We penury to start thinking about how we give antibiotics in observation of a pipeline that's ending. I think gonorrhea will become a paradigm for drug resistance in general". Another masterful agreed. "We've been lucky. For quite some time, we've had treatments for gonorrhea that are simple, economy and effective, and a single dose," explained Dr Robert Kirkcaldy, a medical epidemiologist with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who wrote an essay accompanying the study. "But now we're on-going out of treatment options, and there's a very real possibility that there will be untreatable gonorrhea in the future.
This is a not joking public health crisis on the horizon". The CDC is so upset that the agency issued new treatment recommendations last August. The CDC advised doctors to end using cefixime to treat gonorrhea, and instead use the injectable antibiotic ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone is in the same birth of antibiotics as cefixime.
The CDC has also recommended that physicians closely monitor their patients to guarantee that the treatment is working, and to add a second class of antibiotics to treatment if they suspect the ceftriaxone injection hasn't knocked out the infection. Gonorrhea is an unusually common infection. More than 320000 cases were reported in the United States in 2011.
Sunday 13 September 2015
Dangerous Bacteria Live On Chicken Breasts
Dangerous Bacteria Live On Chicken Breasts.
Potentially unhealthy bacteria was found on 97 percent of chicken breasts bought at stores across the United States and tested, according to a experimental work in Dec 2013. And about half of the chicken samples had at least one breed of bacteria that was resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, the investigators found. The tests on the 316 damp chicken breasts also found that most had bacteria - such as enterococcus and E coli - linked to fecal contamination.
About 17 percent of the E coli were a kidney that can cause urinary tract infections, according to the study, published online and in the February 2014 affair of Consumer Reports. In addition, slight more than 11 percent had two or more types of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Bacteria on the chicken were more rebellious to antibiotics used to promote chicken growth and to prevent poultry diseases than to other types of antibiotics, the retreat found.
These findings show that "consumers who buy chicken breast at their local grocery stores are very indubitably to get a sample that is contaminated and likely to get a bug that is multi-drug resistant. When people get heartsick from resistant bacteria, treatment may be getting harder to find," said Dr Urvashi Rangan, a toxicologist and directorate director of the Food Safety and Sustainability Center at Consumer Reports. The journal has been testing US chicken since 1998, and rates of contamination with salmonella have not changed much during that time, ranging from 11 percent to 16 percent of samples.
Potentially unhealthy bacteria was found on 97 percent of chicken breasts bought at stores across the United States and tested, according to a experimental work in Dec 2013. And about half of the chicken samples had at least one breed of bacteria that was resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, the investigators found. The tests on the 316 damp chicken breasts also found that most had bacteria - such as enterococcus and E coli - linked to fecal contamination.
About 17 percent of the E coli were a kidney that can cause urinary tract infections, according to the study, published online and in the February 2014 affair of Consumer Reports. In addition, slight more than 11 percent had two or more types of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Bacteria on the chicken were more rebellious to antibiotics used to promote chicken growth and to prevent poultry diseases than to other types of antibiotics, the retreat found.
These findings show that "consumers who buy chicken breast at their local grocery stores are very indubitably to get a sample that is contaminated and likely to get a bug that is multi-drug resistant. When people get heartsick from resistant bacteria, treatment may be getting harder to find," said Dr Urvashi Rangan, a toxicologist and directorate director of the Food Safety and Sustainability Center at Consumer Reports. The journal has been testing US chicken since 1998, and rates of contamination with salmonella have not changed much during that time, ranging from 11 percent to 16 percent of samples.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)