Treatment Of Heart Attack And Stroke In Certified Hospitals.
Around the nation, hospitals pass on to themselves as "stroke centers of excellence" or "chest bore centers," the substance being those facilities offer top-notch care for stroke and heart attacks. But stylish programs for certifying, accrediting or recognizing hospitals as providers of the best cardiovascular or stroke care are falling short, according to an American Heart Association/American Stroke Association advisory. "Right now, it's not always sheer what is just a marketing duration and what actually truly distinguishes the quality of a center," said Dr Gregg Fonarow, an American Heart Association spokesman and professor of cardiovascular medication at the University of California, Los Angeles.
A look at of the available data found no clear relationship between having a festive designation as a heart attack or stroke care center and the care the hospitals provide or, even more important, how patients fare. To variation that, the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association are jointly developing a inclusive stroke and cardiovascular care certification program that should go through as a national standard.
The goal is to help patients, insurers and others have more reliable data about where they are most likely to receive the most up-to-date, evidence-based care available. "There is a value to having a trusted origin develop a certification program that clinicians, insurers and the public can use to understand which hospitals are providing uncommon cardiovascular and stroke care, including achieving high-quality outcomes".
The program, which will take from about two years to develop and will likely be done in partnership with other major medical organizations, will cover exigency situations such as heart attack and stroke, but also heart failure management and coronary bypass surgery. The admonitory is published online Nov 12, 2010 and in the Dec 7, 2010 language issue of Circulation.
Typically, recognition and certification programs require that hospitals put certain procedures in place, but they don't praepostor how well hospitals are adhering to the practices or whether patient outcomes are improving precedent author of the advisory. And those are the better certification programs. Other self-proclaimed "centers of excellence" may unmistakably be terms dreamed up by marketing departments.
Showing posts with label association. Show all posts
Showing posts with label association. Show all posts
Wednesday, 8 January 2020
Wednesday, 20 November 2019
People With Diabetes May Have An Increased Risk Of Cancer
People With Diabetes May Have An Increased Risk Of Cancer.
People with diabetes may have something else to be troubled about - an increased jeopardize of cancer, according to a green consensus report produced by experts recruited jointly by the American Cancer Society and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes, mostly type 2 diabetes, has been linked to certain cancers, though experts aren't ineluctable if the disease itself leads to the increased risk or if shared risk factors, such as obesity, may be to blame. Other digging has suggested that some diabetes treatments, such as certain insulins, may also be associated with the circumstance of some cancers.
But the evidence isn't conclusive, and it's difficult to tease out whether the insulin is liable for the association or other risk factors associated with diabetes could be the root of the link. "There have been some epidemiological studies that suggest that individuals who are pot-bellied or who have high levels of insulin appear to have an increased prevalence of certain malignancies, but it's a complex edition because the association is not true for all cancers," explained Dr David Harlan, guide of the Diabetes Center of Excellence at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center in Worcester, and one of the authors of the consensus report. "So, there's some smoke to suggest an linkage - but no clear fire".
As for the viable insulin-and-cancer link, Harlan said that because a weak association was found, it's definitely an court that needs to be pursued further. But that doesn't mean that anyone should change the way they're managing their diabetes. "Our greatest interest to is that individuals with diabetes might choose not to treat their diabetes with insulin or a nice insulin out of concern for a malignancy.
The risk of diabetes complications is a far greater concern. It's get a kick out of when someone decides to drive across the country because they're afraid to fly. While there is a miniature risk of dying in a plane crash, statistically it's far riskier to drive". The consensus put out is published in the July/August issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
People with diabetes may have something else to be troubled about - an increased jeopardize of cancer, according to a green consensus report produced by experts recruited jointly by the American Cancer Society and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes, mostly type 2 diabetes, has been linked to certain cancers, though experts aren't ineluctable if the disease itself leads to the increased risk or if shared risk factors, such as obesity, may be to blame. Other digging has suggested that some diabetes treatments, such as certain insulins, may also be associated with the circumstance of some cancers.
But the evidence isn't conclusive, and it's difficult to tease out whether the insulin is liable for the association or other risk factors associated with diabetes could be the root of the link. "There have been some epidemiological studies that suggest that individuals who are pot-bellied or who have high levels of insulin appear to have an increased prevalence of certain malignancies, but it's a complex edition because the association is not true for all cancers," explained Dr David Harlan, guide of the Diabetes Center of Excellence at the University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center in Worcester, and one of the authors of the consensus report. "So, there's some smoke to suggest an linkage - but no clear fire".
As for the viable insulin-and-cancer link, Harlan said that because a weak association was found, it's definitely an court that needs to be pursued further. But that doesn't mean that anyone should change the way they're managing their diabetes. "Our greatest interest to is that individuals with diabetes might choose not to treat their diabetes with insulin or a nice insulin out of concern for a malignancy.
The risk of diabetes complications is a far greater concern. It's get a kick out of when someone decides to drive across the country because they're afraid to fly. While there is a miniature risk of dying in a plane crash, statistically it's far riskier to drive". The consensus put out is published in the July/August issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
Many People Are Unaware They Have Signs Of Diabetes
Many People Are Unaware They Have Signs Of Diabetes.
New digging shows that many Americans who are at hazard for type 2 diabetes don't maintain they are, and their doctors may not be giving them a clear message about their risk. American Diabetes Association researchers surveyed more than 1400 hoi polloi aged 40 and older and more than 600 health care providers to come to this conclusion. The investigators found that 40 percent of at-risk ladies and gentlemen thought they had no risk for diabetes or prediabetes, and only 30 percent of patients with modifiable jeopardize factors for diabetes believed they had some increased danger for diabetes.
Less than half of at-risk patients said they'd had regular discussions with their health sorrow provider about blood pressure, blood sugar levels and cholesterol, and didn't recall being tested as often as vigorousness care providers reported actually testing them. Only 25 percent of at-risk patients are very or exceptionally knowledgeable about their increased risk for type 2 diabetes or heartlessness disease, according to health care providers.
New digging shows that many Americans who are at hazard for type 2 diabetes don't maintain they are, and their doctors may not be giving them a clear message about their risk. American Diabetes Association researchers surveyed more than 1400 hoi polloi aged 40 and older and more than 600 health care providers to come to this conclusion. The investigators found that 40 percent of at-risk ladies and gentlemen thought they had no risk for diabetes or prediabetes, and only 30 percent of patients with modifiable jeopardize factors for diabetes believed they had some increased danger for diabetes.
Less than half of at-risk patients said they'd had regular discussions with their health sorrow provider about blood pressure, blood sugar levels and cholesterol, and didn't recall being tested as often as vigorousness care providers reported actually testing them. Only 25 percent of at-risk patients are very or exceptionally knowledgeable about their increased risk for type 2 diabetes or heartlessness disease, according to health care providers.
Wednesday, 23 September 2015
Scientists Have Found New Causes Of Stroke
Scientists Have Found New Causes Of Stroke.
Could ache upward the risk for stroke? A new long-term study suggests just that - the greater the anxiety, the greater the jeopardy for stroke. Study participants who suffered the most anxiety had a 33 percent higher endanger for stroke compared to those with the lowest anxiety levels, the researchers found. This is intention to be one of the first studies to show an association between anxiety and stroke. But not everyone is convinced the coherence is real. "I am a little skeptical about the results," said Dr Aviva Lubin, affiliate stroke director at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, who had no part in the study.
The researchers muricate out that anxiety can be related to smoking and increased pulse and blood pressure, which are known jeopardize factors for stroke. However, Lubin still has her doubts. "It still seems a little hard-headed to fully buy into the fact that anxiety itself is a major risk factor that we need to deal with. Lubin said that treating peril factors like smoking, high blood pressure and diabetes are the keys to preventing stroke.
And "I waver that treating anxiety itself is going to decrease the gamble of stroke.The report was published Dec 19, 2013 in the online edition of the journal Stroke. The look at was led by Maya Lambiase, a cardiovascular behavioral medicine researcher in the area of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Her team collected data on more than 6000 common man aged 25 to 74 when they enrolled in the first US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, started in the inappropriate 1970s.
Could ache upward the risk for stroke? A new long-term study suggests just that - the greater the anxiety, the greater the jeopardy for stroke. Study participants who suffered the most anxiety had a 33 percent higher endanger for stroke compared to those with the lowest anxiety levels, the researchers found. This is intention to be one of the first studies to show an association between anxiety and stroke. But not everyone is convinced the coherence is real. "I am a little skeptical about the results," said Dr Aviva Lubin, affiliate stroke director at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, who had no part in the study.
The researchers muricate out that anxiety can be related to smoking and increased pulse and blood pressure, which are known jeopardize factors for stroke. However, Lubin still has her doubts. "It still seems a little hard-headed to fully buy into the fact that anxiety itself is a major risk factor that we need to deal with. Lubin said that treating peril factors like smoking, high blood pressure and diabetes are the keys to preventing stroke.
And "I waver that treating anxiety itself is going to decrease the gamble of stroke.The report was published Dec 19, 2013 in the online edition of the journal Stroke. The look at was led by Maya Lambiase, a cardiovascular behavioral medicine researcher in the area of psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Her team collected data on more than 6000 common man aged 25 to 74 when they enrolled in the first US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, started in the inappropriate 1970s.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)