Patients More Easily Tolerate Rheumatoid Arthritis In A Good Marriage.
A marvellous matrimony helps people with rheumatoid arthritis enjoy better blue blood of life and experience less pain, a new study suggests. "There's something about being in a high-quality nuptials that seems to buffer a patient's emotional health," said research leader Jennifer Barsky Reese, a postdoctoral partner at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. But RA patients in distressed marriages were no better off in terms of calibre of life and pain than the unmarried patients she studied.
The information is published in the October issue of The Journal of Pain. Reese said her observe went further than other research that has linked being married to aspects of better health. "What we did was look at both marital station and how the quality of the marriage is related to different health status measures in the patient," such as their perception of sorrow and physical and psychological disability.
The researchers evaluated 255 adults with RA, a painful and potentially debilitating invent of arthritis, for marital adjustment, disease activity and pain. Forty-four were in distressed marriages, 114 not distressed and 97 were unmarried. Their mediocre age was 55.
The participants answered questions about how over the moon they were in their marriage, and also noted how much they agreed or disagreed in key areas, including finances, demonstrations of affection, sex, notion of life and interaction with in-laws. "Before we controlled for anything such as illness severity, being in a high-quality marriage is associated with better outcome. These findings suggest the links between being married and vigorousness depend on the quality of the marriage, not simply whether or not one is married".
When the researchers took into consequence such factors as age and disease severity, they found that "better marital quality is still related to lower affective injure and lower psychological disability". Affective pain is an emotional evaluation of pain, how unpleasant a constant finds it. Another measure, sensory pain, reflects how the pain is perceived, how it feels physically to the patient.
Friday, 5 August 2016
Insertion Of A Stent May Save From Leg Amputation
Insertion Of A Stent May Save From Leg Amputation.
When angioplasty fails, patients with cruel external arterial disease may now have another option. A drug-releasing stent placed in the blocked artery below the knee might re-establish blood flow, renewed investigation shows.
Critical limb ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), causes more than 100000 part amputations in the United States each year. Now, researchers from Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City chance insertion of a stent can curb many of these amputations.
In "Traditional balloon angioplasty is plagued by high incidence failure, restenosis (recurrence) and impotence to elevate the patient's symptoms," said lead researcher Dr Robert A Lookstein, colleague director of Mount Sinai's division of interventional radiology. Patients with deprecative limb ischemia have leg pain even when resting and sores that don't heal because of lack of circulation. They are at jeopardize of gangrene and amputation.
But placing a stent in the affected artery during angioplasty greatly improves these problems. The drug-eluting stent keeps the narrowed artery humanitarian and releases a medication for several weeks after implantation, preventing the artery from closing again. "Patients with the least wicked texture of the (severe) disease, those with pain at rest, as well as the patients with minor skin infection of their legs, were able to keep off major amputation".
But some patients with severe disease and those with gangrene still lost a limb who was scheduled to adduce the finding Monday at the Society of Interventional Radiology's annual meeting in Tampa, Fla. For the study, Lookstein's body followed 53 patients with critical limb ischemia who had a all-out of 94 drug-eluting stents implanted to treat leg arteries that would not stay open after angioplasty alone. These are the same stents commonly old to open blocked coronary arteries. The remedying was effective in all the patients, the researchers said.
When angioplasty fails, patients with cruel external arterial disease may now have another option. A drug-releasing stent placed in the blocked artery below the knee might re-establish blood flow, renewed investigation shows.
Critical limb ischemia, the most severe form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), causes more than 100000 part amputations in the United States each year. Now, researchers from Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York City chance insertion of a stent can curb many of these amputations.
In "Traditional balloon angioplasty is plagued by high incidence failure, restenosis (recurrence) and impotence to elevate the patient's symptoms," said lead researcher Dr Robert A Lookstein, colleague director of Mount Sinai's division of interventional radiology. Patients with deprecative limb ischemia have leg pain even when resting and sores that don't heal because of lack of circulation. They are at jeopardize of gangrene and amputation.
But placing a stent in the affected artery during angioplasty greatly improves these problems. The drug-eluting stent keeps the narrowed artery humanitarian and releases a medication for several weeks after implantation, preventing the artery from closing again. "Patients with the least wicked texture of the (severe) disease, those with pain at rest, as well as the patients with minor skin infection of their legs, were able to keep off major amputation".
But some patients with severe disease and those with gangrene still lost a limb who was scheduled to adduce the finding Monday at the Society of Interventional Radiology's annual meeting in Tampa, Fla. For the study, Lookstein's body followed 53 patients with critical limb ischemia who had a all-out of 94 drug-eluting stents implanted to treat leg arteries that would not stay open after angioplasty alone. These are the same stents commonly old to open blocked coronary arteries. The remedying was effective in all the patients, the researchers said.
Tuesday, 2 August 2016
Obesity Older Children Are At Increased Risk Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Obesity Older Children Are At Increased Risk Of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Obese older children are at increased imperil for developing the worrisome digestive infirmity known as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), researchers from Kaiser Permanente in California report. In fact, bloody obese children have up to a 40 percent higher endanger of GERD, while those who are moderately obese have up to a 30 percent higher risk of developing it, compared with conventional weight children, researchers say.
So "Although we know that childhood obesity, especially outrageous obesity, comes with risks for serious health conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer, our learning adds yet another condition to the list, which is GERD," said study lead author Corinna Koebnick, a digging scientist at Kaiser Permanente Southern California's Department of Research and Evaluation in Pasadena. While the causes of the long-standing digestive disease are not known, obesity appears to be one of them. "With the increasing spread of childhood obesity, GERD may become more and more of an issue".
GERD can undermine quality of story noting that the disease can cause chronic heartburn, nausea and the potential for respiratory problems such as persistent cough, redness of the larynx and asthma. GERD has already been linked to obesity in adults, many of whom are familiar with its intermittent heartburn resulting from liquor containing stomach acid that backs up into the esophagus. Untreated, GERD can development in chronic inflammation of the lining of the esophagus and, more rarely, to lasting damage, including ulcers and scarring.
About 10 percent of GERD patients also go on to promote a precancerous condition known as Barrett's esophagus, which in a poor minority will develop into cancer. Kaiser researchers noted that GERD that persists through adulthood increases the danger for esophageal cancer later in life.
Cancer of the esophagus is the fastest growing cancer in the United States, and is expected to false in frequency over the next 20 years. This extension may be partly due to the obesity epidemic.
The report is published in the July 9 online edition of the International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. For the Kaiser study, Koebnick's gang collected details on more than 690000 children aged 2 to 19 years old. These children were members of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated salubriousness plan in 2007 and 2008.
Obese older children are at increased imperil for developing the worrisome digestive infirmity known as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), researchers from Kaiser Permanente in California report. In fact, bloody obese children have up to a 40 percent higher endanger of GERD, while those who are moderately obese have up to a 30 percent higher risk of developing it, compared with conventional weight children, researchers say.
So "Although we know that childhood obesity, especially outrageous obesity, comes with risks for serious health conditions, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer, our learning adds yet another condition to the list, which is GERD," said study lead author Corinna Koebnick, a digging scientist at Kaiser Permanente Southern California's Department of Research and Evaluation in Pasadena. While the causes of the long-standing digestive disease are not known, obesity appears to be one of them. "With the increasing spread of childhood obesity, GERD may become more and more of an issue".
GERD can undermine quality of story noting that the disease can cause chronic heartburn, nausea and the potential for respiratory problems such as persistent cough, redness of the larynx and asthma. GERD has already been linked to obesity in adults, many of whom are familiar with its intermittent heartburn resulting from liquor containing stomach acid that backs up into the esophagus. Untreated, GERD can development in chronic inflammation of the lining of the esophagus and, more rarely, to lasting damage, including ulcers and scarring.
About 10 percent of GERD patients also go on to promote a precancerous condition known as Barrett's esophagus, which in a poor minority will develop into cancer. Kaiser researchers noted that GERD that persists through adulthood increases the danger for esophageal cancer later in life.
Cancer of the esophagus is the fastest growing cancer in the United States, and is expected to false in frequency over the next 20 years. This extension may be partly due to the obesity epidemic.
The report is published in the July 9 online edition of the International Journal of Pediatric Obesity. For the Kaiser study, Koebnick's gang collected details on more than 690000 children aged 2 to 19 years old. These children were members of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California integrated salubriousness plan in 2007 and 2008.
50 Years Is The Most Dangerous Age For Women
50 Years Is The Most Dangerous Age For Women.
Breast cancer chance in women may be tied to the reproach at which their breast-tissue density changes as they age, a remodelled study suggests Dec 2013. Researchers examined 282 breast cancer patients and 317 women without the cancer who underwent both mammography and an automated breast-density test. Breast cancer patients under duration 50 tended to have greater breast density than healthy women under era 50, the researchers said Tuesday at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, in Chicago. Overall, the vigorous women also showed a significant, steady decline in their breast density with age.
There was considerably more varying in the amount of density loss among the breast cancer patients. "The results are interesting, because there would appear to be some constitute of different biological density mechanism for normal breasts compared to breasts with cancer, and this appears to be most glaring for younger women," study senior writer Nicholas Perry, director of the London Breast Institute in the United Kingdom, said in a fraternity news release. "Women under age 50 are most at risk from density-associated breast cancer. Breast cancer in younger women is regularly of a more aggressive type, with larger tumors and a higher danger of recurrence".
Breast density, as determined by mammography, is already known to be a strong and independent risk factor for boob cancer. The American Cancer Society considers women with extremely dense breasts to be at within limits increased risk of cancer and recommends they talk with their doctors about adding MRI screening to their year after year mammograms. "The findings are not likely to diminish the current American Cancer Society guidelines in any way. But it might reckon a new facet regarding the possibility of an early mammogram to locate an obvious risk factor (breast density), which may then lead to enhanced screening for those women with the densest breasts".
Breast cancer chance in women may be tied to the reproach at which their breast-tissue density changes as they age, a remodelled study suggests Dec 2013. Researchers examined 282 breast cancer patients and 317 women without the cancer who underwent both mammography and an automated breast-density test. Breast cancer patients under duration 50 tended to have greater breast density than healthy women under era 50, the researchers said Tuesday at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, in Chicago. Overall, the vigorous women also showed a significant, steady decline in their breast density with age.
There was considerably more varying in the amount of density loss among the breast cancer patients. "The results are interesting, because there would appear to be some constitute of different biological density mechanism for normal breasts compared to breasts with cancer, and this appears to be most glaring for younger women," study senior writer Nicholas Perry, director of the London Breast Institute in the United Kingdom, said in a fraternity news release. "Women under age 50 are most at risk from density-associated breast cancer. Breast cancer in younger women is regularly of a more aggressive type, with larger tumors and a higher danger of recurrence".
Breast density, as determined by mammography, is already known to be a strong and independent risk factor for boob cancer. The American Cancer Society considers women with extremely dense breasts to be at within limits increased risk of cancer and recommends they talk with their doctors about adding MRI screening to their year after year mammograms. "The findings are not likely to diminish the current American Cancer Society guidelines in any way. But it might reckon a new facet regarding the possibility of an early mammogram to locate an obvious risk factor (breast density), which may then lead to enhanced screening for those women with the densest breasts".
Monday, 1 August 2016
The Depression Is Associated With Heart Troubles
The Depression Is Associated With Heart Troubles.
Depression is rather stock in patients who undergo heart bypass surgery, and a new study finds that short-term use of antidepressants may support patients' recovery May 2013. "Depression among patients requiring or having undergone sidestep surgery is high and can significantly impact postoperative recovery," said one crackerjack not connected to the study, Dr Bryan Bruno, acting chairman of the department of psychiatry at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. In this study, a duo of French researchers looked at 182 patients who started taking a discerning serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant two to three weeks before undergoing coronary artery go graft surgery and continued taking it for six months after the procedure.
SSRIs number widely used antidepressants such as Celexa, Lexapro, Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft. In this study, patients took one 10 milligram tombstone of Lexapro (escitalopram) daily. The reflect on was funded by Lexapro's maker, H Lundbeck A/S. The outcomes of patients prescribed Lexapro were compared to 179 patients who took an dormant placebo as an alternative of the antidepressant.
During the six months after the surgery, the patients who took the antidepressant reported less dejection and better quality of life than those who took the placebo, the researchers reported. In addition, taking antidepressants did not multiplication the risk of complications or death in the year after surgery, according to the study, which appears in the May culmination of the Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Depression is rather stock in patients who undergo heart bypass surgery, and a new study finds that short-term use of antidepressants may support patients' recovery May 2013. "Depression among patients requiring or having undergone sidestep surgery is high and can significantly impact postoperative recovery," said one crackerjack not connected to the study, Dr Bryan Bruno, acting chairman of the department of psychiatry at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. In this study, a duo of French researchers looked at 182 patients who started taking a discerning serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant two to three weeks before undergoing coronary artery go graft surgery and continued taking it for six months after the procedure.
SSRIs number widely used antidepressants such as Celexa, Lexapro, Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft. In this study, patients took one 10 milligram tombstone of Lexapro (escitalopram) daily. The reflect on was funded by Lexapro's maker, H Lundbeck A/S. The outcomes of patients prescribed Lexapro were compared to 179 patients who took an dormant placebo as an alternative of the antidepressant.
During the six months after the surgery, the patients who took the antidepressant reported less dejection and better quality of life than those who took the placebo, the researchers reported. In addition, taking antidepressants did not multiplication the risk of complications or death in the year after surgery, according to the study, which appears in the May culmination of the Annals of Thoracic Surgery.
Women Are Happy To Be A Donor Egg
Women Are Happy To Be A Donor Egg.
Most women who give out as egg donors take on a positive take on their experience a year later, redesigned research indicates. Researchers polled 75 egg donors at the time of egg retrieval and one year later, and found that the women remained happy, honourable and carefree about their experience. "Up until now we've known that donors are by and strapping very satisfied by their experience when it takes place," said read lead author Andrea M Braverman, director of complementary and alternative medicine at Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey in Morristown. "And now we usher that for the vast majority the doctrinaire experience persists".
Braverman and colleagues from the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in Piscataway, NJ, were scheduled to largesse their survey findings Wednesday in Denver at a meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. A year after donation, the women said they rarely worried about either the health or fervent well-being of the children they helped to spawn. They said they only think about the donation occasionally and on rare occasions discuss it.
The donors also reported that financial compensation was not the number-one motive for facilitating another woman's pregnancy. Rather, a after to help others achieve their dreams was pegged as the driving force, followed by paper money and feeling good.
Women who said the donation process made them feel worthwhile tended to be unagreed to the notion of meeting their offspring when they reach adulthood. And most donors were receptive to the design of meeting the egg recipients and participating in a donor registry.
Most women who give out as egg donors take on a positive take on their experience a year later, redesigned research indicates. Researchers polled 75 egg donors at the time of egg retrieval and one year later, and found that the women remained happy, honourable and carefree about their experience. "Up until now we've known that donors are by and strapping very satisfied by their experience when it takes place," said read lead author Andrea M Braverman, director of complementary and alternative medicine at Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey in Morristown. "And now we usher that for the vast majority the doctrinaire experience persists".
Braverman and colleagues from the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in Piscataway, NJ, were scheduled to largesse their survey findings Wednesday in Denver at a meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. A year after donation, the women said they rarely worried about either the health or fervent well-being of the children they helped to spawn. They said they only think about the donation occasionally and on rare occasions discuss it.
The donors also reported that financial compensation was not the number-one motive for facilitating another woman's pregnancy. Rather, a after to help others achieve their dreams was pegged as the driving force, followed by paper money and feeling good.
Women who said the donation process made them feel worthwhile tended to be unagreed to the notion of meeting their offspring when they reach adulthood. And most donors were receptive to the design of meeting the egg recipients and participating in a donor registry.
Tuesday, 19 July 2016
Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer
Effects Of Some Industrial Chemicals To Increase The Risk Of Breast Cancer.
The children of women who are exposed to in the cards industrial chemicals while fertile are at an increased hazard for developing breast cancer as adults, a new animal office suggests. The chemicals - bisphenol-A (BPA) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) - are pre-eminently produced for industrial manufacturing purposes, and are known for interfering with hormonal and metabolic processes, while distressing neurological and immune function, among both people and animals.
So "BPA is a weak estrogen and DES is a telling estrogen, yet our study shows both have a profound effect on gene expression in the mammary gland boob throughout life," study author Dr Hugh Taylor, from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, said in a newsflash release from the Endocrine Society. "All estrogens, even 'weak' ones, can vary the development of the breast and ultimately place adult women who were exposed to them prenatally at peril of breast cancer".
The findings will be published in the June issue of Hormones & Cancer, the gazette of the Endocrine Society. The authors draw their conclusions from work with replete mice who were exposed to both BPA and DES. Once reaching adulthood, the offspring were found to produce higher than natural levels of a protein involved in gene regulation, called EZH2.
The children of women who are exposed to in the cards industrial chemicals while fertile are at an increased hazard for developing breast cancer as adults, a new animal office suggests. The chemicals - bisphenol-A (BPA) and diethylstilbestrol (DES) - are pre-eminently produced for industrial manufacturing purposes, and are known for interfering with hormonal and metabolic processes, while distressing neurological and immune function, among both people and animals.
So "BPA is a weak estrogen and DES is a telling estrogen, yet our study shows both have a profound effect on gene expression in the mammary gland boob throughout life," study author Dr Hugh Taylor, from the Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, said in a newsflash release from the Endocrine Society. "All estrogens, even 'weak' ones, can vary the development of the breast and ultimately place adult women who were exposed to them prenatally at peril of breast cancer".
The findings will be published in the June issue of Hormones & Cancer, the gazette of the Endocrine Society. The authors draw their conclusions from work with replete mice who were exposed to both BPA and DES. Once reaching adulthood, the offspring were found to produce higher than natural levels of a protein involved in gene regulation, called EZH2.
Sunday, 17 July 2016
Gonorrhea Can Not Be Treated By Existing Antibiotics
Gonorrhea Can Not Be Treated By Existing Antibiotics.
The sexually transmitted disorder gonorrhea is comely increasingly resistant to available antibiotics, including the ultimate oral antibiotic used to treat the bacterium, new Canadian research shows. In a read of nearly 300 people infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the researchers found a treatment washout rate of nearly 7 percent in people treated with cefixime, the last available oral antibiotic for gonorrhea. "Gonorrhea is a bacterium that's unheard-of in its ability to mutate quickly, and we no longer have the same over-abundance of options anymore," said study author Dr Vanessa Allen, a medical microbiologist with Public Health Ontario in Toronto.
So "We penury to start thinking about how we give antibiotics in observation of a pipeline that's ending. I think gonorrhea will become a paradigm for drug resistance in general". Another masterful agreed. "We've been lucky. For quite some time, we've had treatments for gonorrhea that are simple, economy and effective, and a single dose," explained Dr Robert Kirkcaldy, a medical epidemiologist with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who wrote an essay accompanying the study. "But now we're on-going out of treatment options, and there's a very real possibility that there will be untreatable gonorrhea in the future.
This is a not joking public health crisis on the horizon". The CDC is so upset that the agency issued new treatment recommendations last August. The CDC advised doctors to end using cefixime to treat gonorrhea, and instead use the injectable antibiotic ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone is in the same birth of antibiotics as cefixime.
The CDC has also recommended that physicians closely monitor their patients to guarantee that the treatment is working, and to add a second class of antibiotics to treatment if they suspect the ceftriaxone injection hasn't knocked out the infection. Gonorrhea is an unusually common infection. More than 320000 cases were reported in the United States in 2011.
The sexually transmitted disorder gonorrhea is comely increasingly resistant to available antibiotics, including the ultimate oral antibiotic used to treat the bacterium, new Canadian research shows. In a read of nearly 300 people infected with Neisseria gonorrhoeae, the researchers found a treatment washout rate of nearly 7 percent in people treated with cefixime, the last available oral antibiotic for gonorrhea. "Gonorrhea is a bacterium that's unheard-of in its ability to mutate quickly, and we no longer have the same over-abundance of options anymore," said study author Dr Vanessa Allen, a medical microbiologist with Public Health Ontario in Toronto.
So "We penury to start thinking about how we give antibiotics in observation of a pipeline that's ending. I think gonorrhea will become a paradigm for drug resistance in general". Another masterful agreed. "We've been lucky. For quite some time, we've had treatments for gonorrhea that are simple, economy and effective, and a single dose," explained Dr Robert Kirkcaldy, a medical epidemiologist with the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who wrote an essay accompanying the study. "But now we're on-going out of treatment options, and there's a very real possibility that there will be untreatable gonorrhea in the future.
This is a not joking public health crisis on the horizon". The CDC is so upset that the agency issued new treatment recommendations last August. The CDC advised doctors to end using cefixime to treat gonorrhea, and instead use the injectable antibiotic ceftriaxone. Ceftriaxone is in the same birth of antibiotics as cefixime.
The CDC has also recommended that physicians closely monitor their patients to guarantee that the treatment is working, and to add a second class of antibiotics to treatment if they suspect the ceftriaxone injection hasn't knocked out the infection. Gonorrhea is an unusually common infection. More than 320000 cases were reported in the United States in 2011.
Saturday, 16 July 2016
Children Who Were Breastfed In The Future Much Better In School
Children Who Were Breastfed In The Future Much Better In School.
Adding to reports that breast-feeding boosts perspicacity health, a uncharted scan finds that infants breast-fed for six months or longer, especially boys, do considerably better in school at majority 10 compared to bottle-fed tots, according to a new study. "Breast-feeding should be promoted for both boys and girls for its consummate benefits," said study leader Wendy Oddy, a researcher at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, Australia. For the study, published online Dec 20, 2010 in Pediatrics, she and her colleagues looked at the abstract scores at maturity 10 of more than a thousand children whose mothers had enrolled in an continual study in western Australia.
After adjusting for such factors as gender, kids income, maternal factors and early stimulation at home, such as reading to children, they estimated the links between breast-feeding and academic outcomes. Babies who were mainly breast-fed for six months or longer had higher erudite scores on standardized tests than those breast-fed fewer than six months, she found. But the consequence varied by gender, and the improvements were only significant from a statistical point of view for the boys.
The boys had better scores in math, reading, spelling and script if they were breast-fed six months or longer. Girls breast-fed for six months or longer had a short but statistically insignificant benefit in reading scores. The why for the gender differences is unclear, but Oddy speculates that the protective role of breast withdraw on the brain and its later consequences for language development may have greater benefits for boys because they are more vulnerable during touch-and-go development periods.
Another possibility has to do with the positive effect of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship. "A several of studies found that boys are more reliant than girls on maternal attention and encouragement for the acquisition of cognitive and parlance skills. If breastfeeding facilitates mother-child interactions, then we would expect the positive effects of this check to be greater in males compared with females, as we observed".
Adding to reports that breast-feeding boosts perspicacity health, a uncharted scan finds that infants breast-fed for six months or longer, especially boys, do considerably better in school at majority 10 compared to bottle-fed tots, according to a new study. "Breast-feeding should be promoted for both boys and girls for its consummate benefits," said study leader Wendy Oddy, a researcher at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research in Perth, Australia. For the study, published online Dec 20, 2010 in Pediatrics, she and her colleagues looked at the abstract scores at maturity 10 of more than a thousand children whose mothers had enrolled in an continual study in western Australia.
After adjusting for such factors as gender, kids income, maternal factors and early stimulation at home, such as reading to children, they estimated the links between breast-feeding and academic outcomes. Babies who were mainly breast-fed for six months or longer had higher erudite scores on standardized tests than those breast-fed fewer than six months, she found. But the consequence varied by gender, and the improvements were only significant from a statistical point of view for the boys.
The boys had better scores in math, reading, spelling and script if they were breast-fed six months or longer. Girls breast-fed for six months or longer had a short but statistically insignificant benefit in reading scores. The why for the gender differences is unclear, but Oddy speculates that the protective role of breast withdraw on the brain and its later consequences for language development may have greater benefits for boys because they are more vulnerable during touch-and-go development periods.
Another possibility has to do with the positive effect of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship. "A several of studies found that boys are more reliant than girls on maternal attention and encouragement for the acquisition of cognitive and parlance skills. If breastfeeding facilitates mother-child interactions, then we would expect the positive effects of this check to be greater in males compared with females, as we observed".
Frequent Consumption Of Energy Drinks Can Lead To Poor Health
Frequent Consumption Of Energy Drinks Can Lead To Poor Health.
As the lionization of vim and vigour drinks has soared, so has the number of Americans seeking care in hospital emergency rooms after consuming these highly caffeinated beverages, federal health officials report. Between 2007 and 2011, the add of ER visits more than doubled from roughly 10000 to almost 21000. In 2011, 58 percent of these ER visits tortuous energy drinks alone, while 42 percent also included medicament or alcohol use. Most of these cases complicated teens or young adults, although there was an alarming spike in the number of people aged 40 and older showing up in the ER after consuming these drinks, according to the clock in from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Symptoms ranged from insomnia, nervousness, headaches and rapid heartbeats to seizures. Energy drinks keep under control high amounts of caffeine that can stimulate both the central nervous system and cardiovascular system, experts note. Caffeine levels in spirit drinks range from about 80 milligrams (mg) to more than 500 mg in a can or bottle, the turn up noted, while a 5-ounce cup of coffee contains 100 mg of caffeine and a 12-ounce soda contains 50 mg of caffeine, the circulate said.
The beverages can also have other ingredients that may increase the stimulant effects of caffeine, according to report. Many doctors are vexed about the high levels of caffeine in energy drinks, which can cause a major increase in heart grade and drive up blood pressure, explained Dr Suzanne Steinbaum, a preventive cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "In anyone who has any underlying sentiment condition, these two clobber can be deadly," she told HealthDay recently. "Know what you're drinking before you drink it".
Dr Mary Claire O'Brien, a important expert on energy drinks from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston Salem, NC, had this this to about about the findings. "The issue is not the doubling of pinch department visits. That is the symptom," O'Brien said. "The 'disease' is the lemon of the federal government to regulate energy drinks as beverages".
As the lionization of vim and vigour drinks has soared, so has the number of Americans seeking care in hospital emergency rooms after consuming these highly caffeinated beverages, federal health officials report. Between 2007 and 2011, the add of ER visits more than doubled from roughly 10000 to almost 21000. In 2011, 58 percent of these ER visits tortuous energy drinks alone, while 42 percent also included medicament or alcohol use. Most of these cases complicated teens or young adults, although there was an alarming spike in the number of people aged 40 and older showing up in the ER after consuming these drinks, according to the clock in from the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
Symptoms ranged from insomnia, nervousness, headaches and rapid heartbeats to seizures. Energy drinks keep under control high amounts of caffeine that can stimulate both the central nervous system and cardiovascular system, experts note. Caffeine levels in spirit drinks range from about 80 milligrams (mg) to more than 500 mg in a can or bottle, the turn up noted, while a 5-ounce cup of coffee contains 100 mg of caffeine and a 12-ounce soda contains 50 mg of caffeine, the circulate said.
The beverages can also have other ingredients that may increase the stimulant effects of caffeine, according to report. Many doctors are vexed about the high levels of caffeine in energy drinks, which can cause a major increase in heart grade and drive up blood pressure, explained Dr Suzanne Steinbaum, a preventive cardiologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. "In anyone who has any underlying sentiment condition, these two clobber can be deadly," she told HealthDay recently. "Know what you're drinking before you drink it".
Dr Mary Claire O'Brien, a important expert on energy drinks from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center in Winston Salem, NC, had this this to about about the findings. "The issue is not the doubling of pinch department visits. That is the symptom," O'Brien said. "The 'disease' is the lemon of the federal government to regulate energy drinks as beverages".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)