Patients With Cancer Choose Surgery.
People with talk cancer who endure surgery before receiving radiation treatment fare better than those who start treatment with chemotherapy, according to a small reborn study. Many patients may be hesitant to begin their treatment with an invasive procedure, University of Michigan researchers noted. But advanced surgical techniques can pick up patients' chances for survival, the authors illustrious in a university news release. The study was published online Dec 26, 2013 in JAMA Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.
Nearly 14000 Americans will be diagnosed with voice cancer this year and 2,070 will Euphemistic depart from the disease, according to the American Cancer Society. "To a minor person with tongue cancer, chemotherapy may sound like a better option than surgery with extensive reconstruction," inquiry author Dr Douglas Chepeha, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of Michigan Medical School, said in the despatch release. "But patients with oral pit cancer can't tolerate induction chemotherapy as well as they can handle surgery with follow-up radiation".
And "Our techniques of reconstruction are advanced and propose patients better survival and functional outcomes". The retreat involved 19 people with advanced oral cavity mouth cancer. All of the participants were given an first dose of chemotherapy (called "induction" chemotherapy). Patients whose cancer was reduced in square footage by 50 percent received more chemotherapy as well as radiation therapy.
Sunday, 2 February 2020
The Researchers Found That High Blood Sugar Impairs Brain Communication With The Nervous System
The Researchers Found That High Blood Sugar Impairs Brain Communication With The Nervous System.
A covert relationship between diabetes and a heightened chance of heart disease and sudden cardiac death has been spotted by researchers studying mice. In the novel study, published in the June 24, 2010 issue of the journal Neuron, the investigators found that high-priced blood sugar prevents critical communication between the brain and the autonomic concerned system, which controls involuntary activities in the body. "Diseases, such as diabetes, that disturb the function of the autonomic skittish system cause a wide range of abnormalities that include poor control of blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmias and digestive problems," major author Dr Ellis Cooper, of McGill University in Montreal, explained in a low-down release from the journal's publisher. "In most people with diabetes, the malfunction of the autonomic highly-strung system adversely affects their quality of life and shortens enthusiasm expectancy".
For the study, Cooper and his colleagues used mice with a form of diabetes to examine electrical conspicuous transmission from the brain to autonomic neurons. This communication occurs at synapses, which are petite gaps between neurons where electrical signals are relayed cell-to-cell via chemical neurotransmitters.
A covert relationship between diabetes and a heightened chance of heart disease and sudden cardiac death has been spotted by researchers studying mice. In the novel study, published in the June 24, 2010 issue of the journal Neuron, the investigators found that high-priced blood sugar prevents critical communication between the brain and the autonomic concerned system, which controls involuntary activities in the body. "Diseases, such as diabetes, that disturb the function of the autonomic skittish system cause a wide range of abnormalities that include poor control of blood pressure, cardiac arrhythmias and digestive problems," major author Dr Ellis Cooper, of McGill University in Montreal, explained in a low-down release from the journal's publisher. "In most people with diabetes, the malfunction of the autonomic highly-strung system adversely affects their quality of life and shortens enthusiasm expectancy".
For the study, Cooper and his colleagues used mice with a form of diabetes to examine electrical conspicuous transmission from the brain to autonomic neurons. This communication occurs at synapses, which are petite gaps between neurons where electrical signals are relayed cell-to-cell via chemical neurotransmitters.
Saturday, 1 February 2020
Breakfast Cereals For Children Are A Lot Of Sugar
Breakfast Cereals For Children Are A Lot Of Sugar.
Getting kids to delightedly nourishment nutritious, low-sugar breakfast cereals may be child's play, researchers report. A changed study finds that children will gladly chow down on low-sugar cereals if they're given a extract of choices at breakfast, and many compensate for any missing sweetness by opting for fruit instead. The 5-to-12-year-olds in the contemplation still ate about the same amount of calories regardless of whether they were allowed to settle upon from cereals high in sugar or a low-sugar selection.
However, the kids weren't inherently opposed to healthier cereals, the researchers found. "Don't be frightened that your child is going to refuse to eat breakfast. The kids will lunch it," said study co-author Marlene B Schwartz, spokesperson director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.
Nutritionists have covet frowned on sugary breakfast cereals that are heavily marketed by cereal makers and gobbled up by kids. In 2008, Consumer Reports analyzed cereals marketed to kids and found that each serving of 11 peerless brands had about as much sugar as a glazed donut. The armoury also reported that two cereals were more than half sugar by albatross and nine others were at least 40 percent sugar.
This week, subsistence giant General Mills announced that it is reducing the sugar levels in its cereals geared toward children, although they'll still have much more sugar than many of age cereals. In the meantime, many parents believe that if cereals aren't primed with sweetness, kids won't eat them.
But is that true? In the restored study, researchers offered different breakfast cereal choices to 91 urban children who took split up in a summer day camp program in New England. Most were from minorities families and about 60 percent were Spanish-speaking.
Getting kids to delightedly nourishment nutritious, low-sugar breakfast cereals may be child's play, researchers report. A changed study finds that children will gladly chow down on low-sugar cereals if they're given a extract of choices at breakfast, and many compensate for any missing sweetness by opting for fruit instead. The 5-to-12-year-olds in the contemplation still ate about the same amount of calories regardless of whether they were allowed to settle upon from cereals high in sugar or a low-sugar selection.
However, the kids weren't inherently opposed to healthier cereals, the researchers found. "Don't be frightened that your child is going to refuse to eat breakfast. The kids will lunch it," said study co-author Marlene B Schwartz, spokesperson director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.
Nutritionists have covet frowned on sugary breakfast cereals that are heavily marketed by cereal makers and gobbled up by kids. In 2008, Consumer Reports analyzed cereals marketed to kids and found that each serving of 11 peerless brands had about as much sugar as a glazed donut. The armoury also reported that two cereals were more than half sugar by albatross and nine others were at least 40 percent sugar.
This week, subsistence giant General Mills announced that it is reducing the sugar levels in its cereals geared toward children, although they'll still have much more sugar than many of age cereals. In the meantime, many parents believe that if cereals aren't primed with sweetness, kids won't eat them.
But is that true? In the restored study, researchers offered different breakfast cereal choices to 91 urban children who took split up in a summer day camp program in New England. Most were from minorities families and about 60 percent were Spanish-speaking.
Thursday, 23 January 2020
Many Women In The First Year After Menopause Deteriorating Memory And Fine Motor Skills
Many Women In The First Year After Menopause Deteriorating Memory And Fine Motor Skills.
Women growing through menopause occasionally give the impression they are off their mental game, forgetting phone numbers and passwords, or struggling to find a particular word. It can be frustrating, baffling and worrisome, but a small new study helps to explain the struggle. Researchers found that women in the initially year after menopause perform slightly worse on certain mentally ill tests than do those who are approaching their post-reproductive years. "This study shows, as have others, that there are cognitive cognitive declines that are real, statistically significant and clinically significant," said study author Miriam Weber, an helpmeet professor in the department of neurology at the University of Rochester in Rochester, NY "These are remote declines in performance, so women aren't becoming globally impaired and unable to function. But you cognizance it on a daily basis".
The study is published in the current issue of the journal Menopause. According to the researchers, the technique of learning, retaining and applying new information is associated with regions of the discernment that are rich in estrogen receptors. The natural fluctuation of the hormone estrogen during menopause seems to be linked to problems associated with ratiocinative and memory. "We found the problem is not related to absolute hormone levels. Estrogen declines in the transition, but before it falls, there are theatrical fluctuations".
Weber explained that it is the variation in estrogen constant that most likely plays a critical role in creating the memory problems many women experience. As the body readjusts to the changes in hormonal levels on a future occasion after a woman's period stops, the researchers shady mental challenges diminish. While Weber said it is important that women gather from that memory issues associated with menopause are most likely normal and temporary, the study did not include women whose periods had stopped for longer than one year. Weber added that she plans to pinpoint more exactly how long-term recollection and thinking problems persist in a future study.
Other research has offered conflicting conclusions about the rational changes associated with menopause, the study authors wrote. The Chicago spot of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) initially found no relation between what stage of menopause women were in and how they performed on tests of working homage or perceptual speed. However, a different SWAN mull over identified deficits in memory and processing speed in the late menopausal stage.
Studies of menopause typically characterize distinct stages of menopause, although researchers may differ in where they draw the line between those transitions. The researchers tortuous with this study said that the variation in findings between studies may be due to different ways of staging menopause.
Women growing through menopause occasionally give the impression they are off their mental game, forgetting phone numbers and passwords, or struggling to find a particular word. It can be frustrating, baffling and worrisome, but a small new study helps to explain the struggle. Researchers found that women in the initially year after menopause perform slightly worse on certain mentally ill tests than do those who are approaching their post-reproductive years. "This study shows, as have others, that there are cognitive cognitive declines that are real, statistically significant and clinically significant," said study author Miriam Weber, an helpmeet professor in the department of neurology at the University of Rochester in Rochester, NY "These are remote declines in performance, so women aren't becoming globally impaired and unable to function. But you cognizance it on a daily basis".
The study is published in the current issue of the journal Menopause. According to the researchers, the technique of learning, retaining and applying new information is associated with regions of the discernment that are rich in estrogen receptors. The natural fluctuation of the hormone estrogen during menopause seems to be linked to problems associated with ratiocinative and memory. "We found the problem is not related to absolute hormone levels. Estrogen declines in the transition, but before it falls, there are theatrical fluctuations".
Weber explained that it is the variation in estrogen constant that most likely plays a critical role in creating the memory problems many women experience. As the body readjusts to the changes in hormonal levels on a future occasion after a woman's period stops, the researchers shady mental challenges diminish. While Weber said it is important that women gather from that memory issues associated with menopause are most likely normal and temporary, the study did not include women whose periods had stopped for longer than one year. Weber added that she plans to pinpoint more exactly how long-term recollection and thinking problems persist in a future study.
Other research has offered conflicting conclusions about the rational changes associated with menopause, the study authors wrote. The Chicago spot of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) initially found no relation between what stage of menopause women were in and how they performed on tests of working homage or perceptual speed. However, a different SWAN mull over identified deficits in memory and processing speed in the late menopausal stage.
Studies of menopause typically characterize distinct stages of menopause, although researchers may differ in where they draw the line between those transitions. The researchers tortuous with this study said that the variation in findings between studies may be due to different ways of staging menopause.
Wednesday, 22 January 2020
The Use Of Steroids For The Treatment Of Spinal Stenosis
The Use Of Steroids For The Treatment Of Spinal Stenosis.
Older adults who get steroid injections for degeneration in their put down spinal column may fare worse than woman in the street who skip the treatment, a small study suggests. The research, published recently in the chronicle Spine, followed 276 older adults with spinal stenosis in the lower back. In spinal stenosis, the raise spaces in the spinal column gradually narrow, which can put pressure on nerves. The important symptoms are pain or cramping in the legs or buttocks, especially when you walk or stand for a crave period.
The treatments range from "conservative" options like anti-inflammatory painkillers and physical psychotherapy to surgery. People often try steroid injections before resorting to surgery. Steroids calm inflammation, and injecting them into the room around constricted nerves may ease pain - at least temporarily. In the unexplored study, researchers found that patients who got steroid injections did see some pain relief over four years.
But they did not diet as well as patients who went with other conservative treatments or with surgery right away. And if steroid patients ultimately opted for surgery, they did not improve as much as surgery patients who'd skipped the steroids.
It's not shiny why, said lead researcher Dr Kris Radcliff, a spine surgeon with the Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, in Philadelphia. "I deem we need to face at the results with some caution". Some of the study patients were randomly assigned to get steroid injections, but others were not - they opted for the treatment. So it's accomplishable that there's something else about those patients that explains their worse outcomes.
On the other workman steroid injections themselves might hamper healing in the long run. One likelihood is that injecting the materials into an already cramped space in the spine might make the situation worse, once the endorse pain-relieving effects of the steroids wear off. "But that's just our speculation".
A pain brass specialist not involved in the work said it's impossible to pin the blame on epidural steroids based on this study. For one, it wasn't a randomized clinical trial, where all patients were assigned to have steroid injections or not have them, said Dr Steven Cohen, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, in Baltimore. The patients who opted for epidural steroids "may have had more difficult-to-treat pain, or a worse pathology".
Older adults who get steroid injections for degeneration in their put down spinal column may fare worse than woman in the street who skip the treatment, a small study suggests. The research, published recently in the chronicle Spine, followed 276 older adults with spinal stenosis in the lower back. In spinal stenosis, the raise spaces in the spinal column gradually narrow, which can put pressure on nerves. The important symptoms are pain or cramping in the legs or buttocks, especially when you walk or stand for a crave period.
The treatments range from "conservative" options like anti-inflammatory painkillers and physical psychotherapy to surgery. People often try steroid injections before resorting to surgery. Steroids calm inflammation, and injecting them into the room around constricted nerves may ease pain - at least temporarily. In the unexplored study, researchers found that patients who got steroid injections did see some pain relief over four years.
But they did not diet as well as patients who went with other conservative treatments or with surgery right away. And if steroid patients ultimately opted for surgery, they did not improve as much as surgery patients who'd skipped the steroids.
It's not shiny why, said lead researcher Dr Kris Radcliff, a spine surgeon with the Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, in Philadelphia. "I deem we need to face at the results with some caution". Some of the study patients were randomly assigned to get steroid injections, but others were not - they opted for the treatment. So it's accomplishable that there's something else about those patients that explains their worse outcomes.
On the other workman steroid injections themselves might hamper healing in the long run. One likelihood is that injecting the materials into an already cramped space in the spine might make the situation worse, once the endorse pain-relieving effects of the steroids wear off. "But that's just our speculation".
A pain brass specialist not involved in the work said it's impossible to pin the blame on epidural steroids based on this study. For one, it wasn't a randomized clinical trial, where all patients were assigned to have steroid injections or not have them, said Dr Steven Cohen, a professor at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, in Baltimore. The patients who opted for epidural steroids "may have had more difficult-to-treat pain, or a worse pathology".
Smoking And Weight Gain Increases The Death Rate From Prostate Cancer
Smoking And Weight Gain Increases The Death Rate From Prostate Cancer.
Men treated for prostate cancer who smoke or put on glut pounds amass their discrepancy of disease recurrence and of dying from the illness, two new studies show. The findings were presented Tuesday at the American Association for Cancer Research's annual conclave in Washington, DC.
In the fundamental report, a team led by Dr Jing Ma, an associate professor of pharmaceutical at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, found that obesity and smoking may not be risk factors for developing prostate cancer, but they do augmentation the odds that a man who has the illness will die from it. Being overcast and smoking "predispose men to a significantly high risk of cancer-specific and all-cause mortality," Ma said during a Tuesday matinal news conference.
"Compared to lean non-smokers, obese smokers had the highest jeopardy of prostate cancer mortality". For the study, Ma's team collected data on more than 2700 men with prostate cancer who took role in the Physicians Health Study. Over 27 years of follow-up, 882 of the men died, 11 percent from the cancer.
The researchers found that both avoirdupois move further and smoking boosted the risk for dying from the cancer. In fact, every five-point flourish in body mass index (BMI) increased the risk for dying from prostate cancer by 52 percent. BMI is a assessment of height versus weight, with the threshold of overweight set at a BMI of 25 and the sill for obesity set at a BMI of 30.
In addition, men who smoked increased their risk for dying from the cancer by 55 percent, compared with men who never smoked, the muse about found. "These data underscore the lack for implementing effective preventive strategies for weight control and reducing tobacco use in both fit men as well as prostate cancer patients".
In a second report, a team led by Corinne E Joshu, a postdoctoral colleague in the department of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, found that men who gained preponderance after having their prostate removed were almost twice as likely to discover their cancer return as were men who maintained their weight. "Weight gain may increase the risk of prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy," Joshu said during the AACR advice conference.
"Obesity, especially among serene men, may also contribute to the risk of prostate cancer recurrence". For the study, Joshu's crew collected data on more than 1300 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. In addition, the men completed a examine on diet, lifestyle and other factors such as weight, zenith and physical activity five years before surgery and again one year after the procedure.
Men treated for prostate cancer who smoke or put on glut pounds amass their discrepancy of disease recurrence and of dying from the illness, two new studies show. The findings were presented Tuesday at the American Association for Cancer Research's annual conclave in Washington, DC.
In the fundamental report, a team led by Dr Jing Ma, an associate professor of pharmaceutical at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, found that obesity and smoking may not be risk factors for developing prostate cancer, but they do augmentation the odds that a man who has the illness will die from it. Being overcast and smoking "predispose men to a significantly high risk of cancer-specific and all-cause mortality," Ma said during a Tuesday matinal news conference.
"Compared to lean non-smokers, obese smokers had the highest jeopardy of prostate cancer mortality". For the study, Ma's team collected data on more than 2700 men with prostate cancer who took role in the Physicians Health Study. Over 27 years of follow-up, 882 of the men died, 11 percent from the cancer.
The researchers found that both avoirdupois move further and smoking boosted the risk for dying from the cancer. In fact, every five-point flourish in body mass index (BMI) increased the risk for dying from prostate cancer by 52 percent. BMI is a assessment of height versus weight, with the threshold of overweight set at a BMI of 25 and the sill for obesity set at a BMI of 30.
In addition, men who smoked increased their risk for dying from the cancer by 55 percent, compared with men who never smoked, the muse about found. "These data underscore the lack for implementing effective preventive strategies for weight control and reducing tobacco use in both fit men as well as prostate cancer patients".
In a second report, a team led by Corinne E Joshu, a postdoctoral colleague in the department of epidemiology at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, found that men who gained preponderance after having their prostate removed were almost twice as likely to discover their cancer return as were men who maintained their weight. "Weight gain may increase the risk of prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy," Joshu said during the AACR advice conference.
"Obesity, especially among serene men, may also contribute to the risk of prostate cancer recurrence". For the study, Joshu's crew collected data on more than 1300 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy between 1993 and 2006. In addition, the men completed a examine on diet, lifestyle and other factors such as weight, zenith and physical activity five years before surgery and again one year after the procedure.
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV
Researchers Warn About The Harmful Influence Of TV.
A imaginative scrutiny suggests that immersing yourself in news of a shocking and tragic event may not be good for your affective health. People who watched, read and listened to the most coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings - six or more hours quotidian - reported the most acute stress levels over the following weeks. Their symptoms were worse than kinsmen who had been directly exposed to the bombings, either by being there or knowing someone who was there.
Those exposed to the media coverage typically reported around 10 more symptoms - such as re-experiencing the blow and compassion stressed out thinking about it - after the results were adjusted to account for other factors. The study authors phrase the findings should raise more concern about the effects of graphic news coverage. The scrutinize comes with caveats. It's not clear if watching so much coverage directly caused the stress, or if those who were most troubled share something in common that makes them more vulnerable.
Nor is it known whether the stress affected people's true health. Still, the findings offer insight into the triggers for stress and its potential to linger, said inquiry author E Alison Holman, an associate professor of nursing science at the University of California, Irvine. "If proletariat are more stressed out, that has an impact on every part of our life. But not everybody under the sun has those kinds of reactions.
It's important to understand that variation". Holman, who studies how people become stressed, has worked on preceding research that linked acute stress after the 9/11 attacks to later resolution disease in people who hadn't shown signs of it before. Her research has also linked watching the 9/11 attacks palpable to a higher rate of later physical problems. In the new study, researchers old an Internet survey to ask questions of 846 Boston residents, 941 New York City residents and 2888 society from the rest of the country.
A imaginative scrutiny suggests that immersing yourself in news of a shocking and tragic event may not be good for your affective health. People who watched, read and listened to the most coverage of the Boston Marathon bombings - six or more hours quotidian - reported the most acute stress levels over the following weeks. Their symptoms were worse than kinsmen who had been directly exposed to the bombings, either by being there or knowing someone who was there.
Those exposed to the media coverage typically reported around 10 more symptoms - such as re-experiencing the blow and compassion stressed out thinking about it - after the results were adjusted to account for other factors. The study authors phrase the findings should raise more concern about the effects of graphic news coverage. The scrutinize comes with caveats. It's not clear if watching so much coverage directly caused the stress, or if those who were most troubled share something in common that makes them more vulnerable.
Nor is it known whether the stress affected people's true health. Still, the findings offer insight into the triggers for stress and its potential to linger, said inquiry author E Alison Holman, an associate professor of nursing science at the University of California, Irvine. "If proletariat are more stressed out, that has an impact on every part of our life. But not everybody under the sun has those kinds of reactions.
It's important to understand that variation". Holman, who studies how people become stressed, has worked on preceding research that linked acute stress after the 9/11 attacks to later resolution disease in people who hadn't shown signs of it before. Her research has also linked watching the 9/11 attacks palpable to a higher rate of later physical problems. In the new study, researchers old an Internet survey to ask questions of 846 Boston residents, 941 New York City residents and 2888 society from the rest of the country.
US Experts Have Established Reasons Of Decrease In The Pregnancy Rate
US Experts Have Established Reasons Of Decrease In The Pregnancy Rate.
Pregnancy rates pursue to weakening in the United States, a federal make public released Dec 2013 shows. The rate reached a 12-year low in 2009, when there were about 102 pregnancies for every 1000 women age-old 15 to 44, according to the latest statistics from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That be worthy of is 12 percent below the 1990 be entitled to of about 116 pregnancies per 1000 women.
Only the 1997 rate of 102 has been lower during the since 30 years, according to the report. Experts said two factors are driving the downward trend: improved access to descent control and decisions by women to put off childbearing until later in life. Those trends have caused the ordinary age of pregnancy to shift upward. Pregnancy rates for teenagers also have reached celebrated lows that extend across all racial and ethnic groups.
Between 1990 and 2009, the pregnancy gauge fell 51 percent for white and black teenagers, and 40 percent for Hispanic teenagers. The teen origin rate dropped 39 percent between 1991 and 2009, and the teen abortion gait decreased by half during the same period. Overall, pregnancy rates have continued to diminish for women younger than 30. "The amount of knowledge that young women have about their family control options is very different compared to a few decades ago," said Dr Margaret Appleton, manager of the division of obstetrics and gynecology at the Scott andamp; White Clinic in College Station, Texas.
Pregnancy rates pursue to weakening in the United States, a federal make public released Dec 2013 shows. The rate reached a 12-year low in 2009, when there were about 102 pregnancies for every 1000 women age-old 15 to 44, according to the latest statistics from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That be worthy of is 12 percent below the 1990 be entitled to of about 116 pregnancies per 1000 women.
Only the 1997 rate of 102 has been lower during the since 30 years, according to the report. Experts said two factors are driving the downward trend: improved access to descent control and decisions by women to put off childbearing until later in life. Those trends have caused the ordinary age of pregnancy to shift upward. Pregnancy rates for teenagers also have reached celebrated lows that extend across all racial and ethnic groups.
Between 1990 and 2009, the pregnancy gauge fell 51 percent for white and black teenagers, and 40 percent for Hispanic teenagers. The teen origin rate dropped 39 percent between 1991 and 2009, and the teen abortion gait decreased by half during the same period. Overall, pregnancy rates have continued to diminish for women younger than 30. "The amount of knowledge that young women have about their family control options is very different compared to a few decades ago," said Dr Margaret Appleton, manager of the division of obstetrics and gynecology at the Scott andamp; White Clinic in College Station, Texas.
Scientists Are Researching The Causes Of The Inability To Read
Scientists Are Researching The Causes Of The Inability To Read.
Glitches in the connections between unfailing acumen areas may be at the root of the common learning hubbub dyslexia, a new study suggests. It's estimated that up to 15 percent of the US citizens has dyslexia, which impairs people's ability to read. While it has long been considered a brain-based disorder, scientists have not conceded exactly what the issue is.
The new findings, reported in the Dec 6, 2013 circulation of Science, suggest the blame lies in faulty connections between the brain's storage spell for speech sounds and the brain regions that process language. The results were surprising, said be conducive to researcher Bart Boets, because his team expected to find a different problem. For more than 40 years many scientists have meditation that dyslexia involves defects in the brain's "phonetic representations" - which refers to how the central sounds of your native language are categorized in the brain.
But using sensitive perception imaging techniques, Boets and colleagues found that was not the case in 23 dyslexic adults they studied. The phonetic representations in their brains were just as "intact" as those of 22 adults with regular reading skills. Instead, it seemed that in citizenry with dyslexia, language-processing areas of the brain had difficulty accessing those phonetic representations. "A apt metaphor might be the comparison with a computer network," said Boets, of the Leuven Autism Research Consortium in Belgium.
And "We show that the data - the data - on the server itself is intact, but the correlation to access this information is too slow or degraded". And what does that all mean? It's too soon to tell, said Boets. First of all this studio used one form of brain imaging to study a small conglomeration of adult university students. But dyslexia normally begins in childhood.
Glitches in the connections between unfailing acumen areas may be at the root of the common learning hubbub dyslexia, a new study suggests. It's estimated that up to 15 percent of the US citizens has dyslexia, which impairs people's ability to read. While it has long been considered a brain-based disorder, scientists have not conceded exactly what the issue is.
The new findings, reported in the Dec 6, 2013 circulation of Science, suggest the blame lies in faulty connections between the brain's storage spell for speech sounds and the brain regions that process language. The results were surprising, said be conducive to researcher Bart Boets, because his team expected to find a different problem. For more than 40 years many scientists have meditation that dyslexia involves defects in the brain's "phonetic representations" - which refers to how the central sounds of your native language are categorized in the brain.
But using sensitive perception imaging techniques, Boets and colleagues found that was not the case in 23 dyslexic adults they studied. The phonetic representations in their brains were just as "intact" as those of 22 adults with regular reading skills. Instead, it seemed that in citizenry with dyslexia, language-processing areas of the brain had difficulty accessing those phonetic representations. "A apt metaphor might be the comparison with a computer network," said Boets, of the Leuven Autism Research Consortium in Belgium.
And "We show that the data - the data - on the server itself is intact, but the correlation to access this information is too slow or degraded". And what does that all mean? It's too soon to tell, said Boets. First of all this studio used one form of brain imaging to study a small conglomeration of adult university students. But dyslexia normally begins in childhood.
Tuesday, 21 January 2020
FDA Will Strengthen The Supervision Of Used Home Medical Equipment
FDA Will Strengthen The Supervision Of Used Home Medical Equipment.
As the citizenry ages and medical technology improves, more subjects are using complex medical devices such as dialysis machines and ventilators at home, adding to the requisite for better-educated patients. To join this growing need, the US Food and Drug Administration announced Tuesday that it has started a unfamiliar program to ensure that patients and their caregivers use these devices safely and effectively.
So "Medical gubbins home use is becoming an increasingly important public health issue," Dr Jeffrey Shuren, chief of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health said during an afternoon news conference. The US populace is aging, and more people are living longer with chronic diseases that demand home care. "In addition, more patients of all ages are being discharged from the hospital to continue their supervision at home".
Meanwhile, medical devices have become more portable and sophisticated, making it possible to treat and monitor long-lived conditions outside the hospital. "A significant number of devices including infusion pumps, ventilators and mortification care therapies are now being used for home care".
Given the growing number of home medical devices, the intervention plans on developing procedures for makers of home-care equipment. Procedures will incorporate post-marketing follow-up, and other things that will encourage the safe use of these devices. The FDA is also developing eye-opening materials on the safe use of these devices, the agency said.
As the citizenry ages and medical technology improves, more subjects are using complex medical devices such as dialysis machines and ventilators at home, adding to the requisite for better-educated patients. To join this growing need, the US Food and Drug Administration announced Tuesday that it has started a unfamiliar program to ensure that patients and their caregivers use these devices safely and effectively.
So "Medical gubbins home use is becoming an increasingly important public health issue," Dr Jeffrey Shuren, chief of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health said during an afternoon news conference. The US populace is aging, and more people are living longer with chronic diseases that demand home care. "In addition, more patients of all ages are being discharged from the hospital to continue their supervision at home".
Meanwhile, medical devices have become more portable and sophisticated, making it possible to treat and monitor long-lived conditions outside the hospital. "A significant number of devices including infusion pumps, ventilators and mortification care therapies are now being used for home care".
Given the growing number of home medical devices, the intervention plans on developing procedures for makers of home-care equipment. Procedures will incorporate post-marketing follow-up, and other things that will encourage the safe use of these devices. The FDA is also developing eye-opening materials on the safe use of these devices, the agency said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)