Showing posts with label sugar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sugar. Show all posts

Monday, 3 February 2020

Gum Disease Affects Diabetes

Gum Disease Affects Diabetes.
Typical, nonsurgical healing of gum contagion in people with type 2 diabetes will not improve their blood-sugar control, a new study suggests. There's wish been a connection between gum disease and wider health issues, and experts state a prior study had offered some evidence that treatment of gum disease might enhance blood-sugar leadership in patients with diabetes. Nearly half of Americans over age 30 are believed to have gum disease, and males and females with diabetes are at greater risk for the problem, the researchers said.

Well-controlled diabetes is associated with less iron-handed gum disease and a lower risk for progression of gum disease, according to background information in the study. But would an easing of gum complaint help control patients' diabetes? To recoup out, the researchers, led by Steven Engebretson of New York University, tracked outcomes for more than 500 diabetes patients with gum illness who were divided into two groups. One group's gum disorder was treated using scaling, root planing and an oral rinse, followed by further gum disability treatment after three and six months.

The other group received no treatment for their gum disease. Scaling and radicel planing involves scraping away the tartar from above and below the gum line, and smoothing out rough spots on the tooth's root, where germs can collect, according to the US National Institutes of Health. After six months, nation in the curing group showed improvement in their gum disease.

Saturday, 1 February 2020

Breakfast Cereals For Children Are A Lot Of Sugar

Breakfast Cereals For Children Are A Lot Of Sugar.
Getting kids to delightedly nourishment nutritious, low-sugar breakfast cereals may be child's play, researchers report. A changed study finds that children will gladly chow down on low-sugar cereals if they're given a extract of choices at breakfast, and many compensate for any missing sweetness by opting for fruit instead. The 5-to-12-year-olds in the contemplation still ate about the same amount of calories regardless of whether they were allowed to settle upon from cereals high in sugar or a low-sugar selection.

However, the kids weren't inherently opposed to healthier cereals, the researchers found. "Don't be frightened that your child is going to refuse to eat breakfast. The kids will lunch it," said study co-author Marlene B Schwartz, spokesperson director of Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity.

Nutritionists have covet frowned on sugary breakfast cereals that are heavily marketed by cereal makers and gobbled up by kids. In 2008, Consumer Reports analyzed cereals marketed to kids and found that each serving of 11 peerless brands had about as much sugar as a glazed donut. The armoury also reported that two cereals were more than half sugar by albatross and nine others were at least 40 percent sugar.

This week, subsistence giant General Mills announced that it is reducing the sugar levels in its cereals geared toward children, although they'll still have much more sugar than many of age cereals. In the meantime, many parents believe that if cereals aren't primed with sweetness, kids won't eat them.

But is that true? In the restored study, researchers offered different breakfast cereal choices to 91 urban children who took split up in a summer day camp program in New England. Most were from minorities families and about 60 percent were Spanish-speaking.

Saturday, 28 December 2019

The Young Population Of The Usa Began To Use More Sugar

The Young Population Of The Usa Began To Use More Sugar.
Young US adults are consuming more added sugars in their chow and drinks than older - and patently wiser - folks, according to a supplementary government report in May 2013. Released Wednesday, information from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed that from 2005 to 2010, older adults with higher incomes tended to preoccupy less added sugar - defined as sweeteners added to processed and advance foods - than younger people. Sugary sodas serve to bear the brunt of the blame for added sugar in the American diet, but the novel report showed that foods were the greater source.

One-third of calories from added sugars came from beverages. Of note, most of those calories were consumed at accommodations as opposed to outside of the house, the study showed. The report, published in the May pour of the National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief, found that the digit of calories derived from added sugar tended to decline with advancing age among both men and women.

Those grey 60 and older consumed markedly fewer calories from this source then their counterparts ancient 20 to 59. Overall, about 13 percent of adults' total calories came from added sugars. The US Dietary Guidelines for Americans register that no more than 5 percent to 15 percent of calories pedicel from solid fats and added sugars combined.

That likely means that "most men and women continue to consume more food from this category that often does not provide the nutrition of other food groups," said registered dietitian Connie Diekman, boss of university nutrition at Washington University in St Louis. "This check in shows that efforts to educate Americans about healthful eating are still falling short".

Thursday, 26 December 2019

Walks After Each Food Intake Are Very Useful

Walks After Each Food Intake Are Very Useful.
Older adults at peril for getting diabetes who took a 15-minute proceed after every meal improved their blood sugar levels, a restored study shows in June 2013. Three short walks after eating worked better to charge blood sugar levels than one 45-minute walk in the morning or evening, said influence researcher Loretta DiPietro, chairwoman of the George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services in Washington, DC. "More importantly, the post-meal walking was significantly better than the other two distress prescriptions at lowering the post-dinner glucose level".

The after-dinner while is an especially vulnerable span for older people at risk of diabetes. Insulin production decreases, and they may go to bed with extremely momentous blood glucose levels, increasing their chances of diabetes. About 79 million Americans are at danger for type 2 diabetes, in which the body doesn't make enough insulin or doesn't use it effectively.

Being overweight and immobile increases the risk. DiPietro's new research, although tested in only 10 people, suggests that explain walks can lower that risk if they are taken at the right times. The study did not, however, make good that it was the walks causing the improved blood sugar levels.

And "This is surrounded by the first studies to really address the timing of the exercise with regard to its benefit for blood sugar control. In the study, the walks began a half hour after finishing each meal. The inspect is published June 12 in the annual Diabetes Care.

For the study, DiPietro and her colleagues asked the 10 older adults, who were 70 years ancient on average, to complete three sundry exercise routines spaced four weeks apart. At the study's start, the men and women had fasting blood sugar levels of between 105 and 125 milligrams per deciliter. A fasting blood glucose rank of 70 to 100 is considered normal, according to the US National Institutes of Health.

Friday, 19 January 2018

Children With Diabetes Suffer From Holidays

Children With Diabetes Suffer From Holidays.
The holidays are a potentially threatening age for children with diabetes, an expert warns, and parents need to take steps to jail them safe. "It's extremely important for parents to communicate with their child during the holidays to protect the festivities are safe, but also fun," Dr Himala Kashmiri, a pediatric endocrinologist at Loyola University Health System and deputy professor of pediatrics at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, said in a Loyola hearsay release. "Diabetes doesn't mean your child can't get a kick the foods of the season.

It just means you have to be prepared and communicate with your child about how to control blood sugar". People with diabetes have pre-eminent blood sugar levels because their body doesn't make the hormone insulin or doesn't use it properly. Parents should tab their diabetic child's blood sugar more often during the holidays. If the numbers seem high, parents should bearing for ketones in the urine, Kashmiri advised.

Monday, 11 September 2017

Sulfonylurea Drugs Increase The Risk Of Heart Disease

Sulfonylurea Drugs Increase The Risk Of Heart Disease.
New examine shows that older hoi polloi with type 2 diabetes who take drugs known as sulfonylureas to discredit their blood sugar levels may face a higher risk for heart problems than their counterparts who consider metformin. Of the more than 8500 people aged 65 or older with variety 2 diabetes who were enrolled in the trial, 12,4 percent of those given a sulfonylurea drug experienced a fundamentals attack or other cardiovascular event, compared with 10,4 percent of those who were started on metformin. In addition, these pump problems occurred earlier in the course of treatment among those people taking the sulfonylurea drugs, the learning showed.

The head-to-head comparison trial is slated to be presented Saturday at the American Diabetes Association annual convergence in San Diego. Because the findings are being reported at a medical meeting, they should be considered opening until published in a peer-reviewed journal. With type 2 diabetes, the body either does not compose enough of the hormone insulin or doesn't use the insulin it does produce properly.

In either case, the insulin can't do its job, which is to resign glucose (blood sugar) to the body's cells. As a result, glucose builds up in the blood and can exercise havoc on the body. Metformin and sulfonylurea drugs - the latter a form of diabetes drugs including glyburide, glipizide, chlorpropamide, tolbutamide and tolazamide - are often to each the first medications prescribed to lower blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes.

The findings are important, the researchers noted, partly because sulfonylurea drugs are commonly prescribed amongst the superannuated to lower blood glucose levels. In addition, cardiovascular sickness is the leading cause of death among people with type 2 diabetes. For several reasons, however, the original study on these medications is far from the final word on the issue.

For one, people who are started on the sulfonylureas a substitute of metformin are often sicker to begin with, said Dr Spyros G Mezitis, an endocrinologist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Metformin cannot be prescribed to grass roots with unerring kidney and heart problems. Both medications lower blood glucose levels, but go about it in totally different ways.

Sunday, 2 October 2016

The Human Brain Reacts Differently To The Use Of Fructose And Glucose

The Human Brain Reacts Differently To The Use Of Fructose And Glucose.
New check out suggests that fructose, a inferior sugar found result in fruit and added to many other foods as part of high-fructose corn syrup, does not dampen appetite and may cause kinsfolk to eat more compared to another simple sugar, glucose. Glucose and fructose are both simple sugars that are included in correspondent parts in table sugar. In the new study, brain scans suggest that many things happen in your brain, depending on which sugar you consume.

Yale University researchers looked for appetite-related changes in blood circulate in the hypothalamic region of the brains of 20 healthy adults after they ate either glucose or fructose. When commoners consumed glucose, levels of hormones that play a role in theory full were high. In contrast, when participants consumed a fructose beverage, they showed smaller increases in hormones that are associated with nimiety (feeling full).

The findings are published in the Jan 2, 2013 debouchment of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Dr Jonathan Purnell, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, co-authored an opinion piece that accompanied the new study. He said that the findings replicate those found in late animal studies, but "this does not prove that fructose is the cause of the rotundity epidemic, only that it is a possible contributor along with many other environmental and genetic factors".

That said, fructose has found its way into Americans' diets in the sort of sugars - typically in the form of high-fructose corn syrup - that are added to beverages and processed foods. "This increased intake of added sugar containing fructose over the former times several decades has coincided with the take off in obesity in the population, and there is strong evidence from monster studies that this increased intake of fructose is playing a role in this phenomenon," said Purnell, who is allied professor in the university's division of endocrinology, diabetes and clinical nutrition.

But he stressed that nutritionists do not "recommend avoiding habitual sources of fructose, such as fruit, or the occasional use of honey or syrup". And according to Purnell, "excess consumption of processed sugar can be minimized by preparing meals at domicile using whole foods and high-fiber grains".

Saturday, 16 April 2016

Do Not Feed Pets Sugar In Any Form To Keep Them Healthy

Do Not Feed Pets Sugar In Any Form To Keep Them Healthy.
A not-so surprising factor is now appearing in those treats your dearest craves. Over the last five years, sugar has increasingly been added to some popular brands of dog and cat treats to calculate them more palatable and profitable, according to veterinarian Dr Ernie Ward, designer of the Association for Pet Obesity Prevention. Noting that 90 million US pets are considered overweight "If I could only item to one factor causing the modern-day pet chubbiness epidemic, it would have to be treats. It's that seemingly innocent extra 50 calories a day in the deportment of a chew or cookie that adds up to a pound or two each year".

And "Dogs, like humans, have a sloppy tooth, and manufacturers know this. If a dog gobbles a treat quickly, an holder is more likely to give another, and another". Americans spend more than $2 billion annually on dog and cat treats, according to Euromonitor International, a deal in research firm. In fact, some of the largest players in the mood food industry are companies also producing human snack foods, including Del Monte, Nestle, and Proctor & Gamble.

To hoard pets trim and healthy, Ward tells owners to dodge treats with any form of sugar (such as sucrose, dextrose, or fructose) listed as one of the finest three ingredients. "The addition of sugar to pet treats has increased not only the calories but also the what it takes risk of insulin resistance and diabetes".

Veterinarian Dr Jennifer Larsen, an second professor of clinical nutrition at the University of California's School of Veterinary Medicine in Davis, explained that sugar is employed in foods and treats for a variety of reasons, and only some of those are related to palatability. For example, corn syrup is cast-off as a thickener and to delay the dough for proper mixing of ingredients, and dextrose is hand-me-down to evenly distribute moisture throughout a food.

"Sugar has a role in the physical and taste characteristics of many products, dollop to mask bitter flavors imparted by acidifying agents, or changing the texture of particular treat types". Still, consumers remain in the dark as to how much sugar commercial pet treats contain. Unlike child foods, the amount of sugar isn't listed on the label. New labeling regulations are currently being considered, though, that would make known maximum sugar and starch content.

Friday, 13 November 2015

Treatment Of Diabetes In The Elderly

Treatment Of Diabetes In The Elderly.
Better diabetes therapy has slashed rates of complications such as consideration attacks, strokes and amputations in older adults, a uncharted study shows. "All the event rates, if you look at them, everything is a lot better than it was in the 1990s, dramatically better," said reading author Dr Elbert Huang, an associate professor of nostrum at the University of Chicago. The study also found that hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar - a lesser effect of medications that control diabetes - has become one of the top problems seen in seniors, suggesting that doctors may desideratum to rethink drug regimens as patients age.

The findings, published online Dec 9, 2013 in JAMA Internal Medicine, are based on more than 72000 adults elderly 60 and older with genre 2 diabetes. They are being tracked through the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry. Researchers tallied diabetic complications by era and length of time with the disease. People with personification 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease, have too much sugar in the blood.

It's estimated that ruthlessly 23 million people have type 2 diabetes in the United States, about half of them older than 60. Many more are expected to exhibit diabetes in coming years. In general, complications of diabetes tended to go from bad to worse as people got older, the study found. They were also more hard-hearted in people who'd lived with the disease longer. Heart disease was the chief complication seen in seniors who'd lived with the infirmity for less than 10 years.

For every 1000 seniors followed for a year, there were about eight cases of ticker disease diagnosed in those under age 70, about 11 cases in those in their 70s, and roughly 15 cases for those ancient 80 and older. Among those aged 80 or older who'd had diabetes for more than a decade, there were 24 cases of pity disease for every 1000 people who were followed for a year. That's a big chuck from just a decade ago, when a prior study found rates of heart disease in elderly diabetics to be about seven times higher - 182 cases for every 1000 colonize followed for a year.

Friday, 22 November 2013

With The Proper Treatment Of Patients With Diabetes Their Life Expectancy Is Not Reduced

With The Proper Treatment Of Patients With Diabetes Their Life Expectancy Is Not Reduced.
Advances in diabetes sadness have nearly eliminated the disagreement in exuberance expectancy between people with type 1 diabetes and the general population, according to new research. Life expectancy at emergence for someone diagnosed with type 1 diabetes between 1965 and 1980 was estimated to be 68,8 years compared to 72,4 years for the extended population. But, for someone diagnosed with epitome 1 diabetes between 1950 and 1964 the estimated life expectancy at family was just 53,4 years.

So "The outlook for someone with type 1 diabetes can be wonderful," said the study's chief author, Dr Trevor Orchard, professor of epidemiology, medicine and pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. Orchard said that more current improvements in diabetes suffering will make the outlook even brighter for people diagnosed more recently.

And "We'll get the idea further improvements in life expectancy compared to the general population," he said. Results of the new muse about are scheduled to be presented on Saturday at the American Diabetes Association's annual meeting in San Diego.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease, which means the body's unsusceptible system mistakenly sees wholesome cells as foreign invaders, such as a virus. In type 1 diabetes, the immune combination attacks cells in the pancreas that produce insulin, a hormone necessary for your body to use carbohydrates as fuel. Once these cells are destroyed, the body can no longer construct insulin.

People with type 1 diabetes must replace the gone insulin through injections or an insulin pump or they would get very ill and could even die. But, estimating the right bulk of insulin you might need isn't an easy task. Too little insulin, and the blood sugar levels go too high.

Over time, dear blood sugar levels can damage many parts of the body, including the kidneys and the eyes. But if you get too much insulin, blood sugar levels can descent alarmingly low, possibly low enough to cause coma or death.

Monday, 16 September 2013

A Strict Diet Improves The Condition Of The Patient In The First Year After Diagnosis Of Diabetes

A Strict Diet Improves The Condition Of The Patient In The First Year After Diagnosis Of Diabetes.
Dietary changes solitary can raise the white flag the same benefits as changes in both sustenance and utilization in the firstly year after a person is diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, a green study contends. English researchers found that patients who were encouraged to forfeit weight by modifying their diet with the help of a dietician had the same improvements in blood sugar (glycemic) control, pressure loss, cholesterol and triglyceride levels as those who changed both their legislature and physical job levels as 30 minutes of brisk walking five times a week prescription. Both groups achieved about a 10 percent upgrading in blood sugar control, cholesterol and triglyceride levels compared to patients who received tedious care.

The two intervention groups also disoriented an ordinary of 4 percent of their body weight, while those in a performance care group had little or no weight loss. Patients in the bit care group were also three times more likely than those in the intervention groups to create on diabetes medication before the end of the study.

And "Getting populace to exercise is quite difficult, and can be expensive," lead researcher Rob Andrews, a elder lecturer at the University of Bristol, said in an American Diabetes Association scoop release. "What this con tells us is that if you only have a limited amount of money, in that first year of diagnosis, you should pinpoint on getting the diet right".

He pointed out, however, that the bookwork participants with type 2 diabetes preferred to promise in both exercise and dietary changes. "They found diet simply quite negative," he said. One reason they might not have seen an additional promote from exercise, he added, "is because people often make a trade. That is, if they go to the gym, then they take oneself to be as if they can have a treat. That could be why we commonplace no difference in the weight loss for the diet plus exercise group".