Many Preschoolers Get A Lot Of Screen Time, Instead Of Communicating With Parents.
Two-thirds of preschoolers in the United States are exposed to more than the high two hours per era of veil time from television, computers, video games and DVDs recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics, a revitalized study has found. Researchers from Seattle Children's Research Institute and the University of Washington looked at the ordinary screen time of nearly 9000 preschool-age children included in the federal Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort, an observational mug up of more than 10000 children born in 2001.
On average, preschoolers were exposed to four hours of process time each weekday, with 3,6 hours of exposure occurring at home. Those in home-based infant care had a combined average of 5,6 hours of screen time at home and while at youth care, with 87 percent exceeding the recommended two-hour limit, the investigators found.
Showing posts with label hours. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hours. Show all posts
Friday 27 December 2019
Tuesday 3 December 2019
Women In The US Have Less To Do Sports
Women In The US Have Less To Do Sports.
American mothers see more TV and get less mortal activity today than mothers did four decades ago, a green study finds. "With each passing generation, mothers have become increasingly physically inactive, desk-bound and obese, thereby potentially predisposing children to an increased risk of inactivity, adiposity body stoutness and chronic non-communicable diseases," said study leader Edward Archer, an perturb scientist and epidemiologist at the University of South Carolina. "Given that physical activity is an undiluted prerequisite for health and wellness, it is not surprising that inactivity is now a leading cause of death and disease in developed nations," Archer eminent in a university news release.
The analysis of 45 years of national material focused on two groups of mothers: those with children 5 years or younger, and those with children grey 6 to 18. The researchers assessed physical activity related to cooking, cleaning and exercising. From 1965 to 2010, the undistinguished amount of physical activity among mothers with younger children knock from 44 hours to less than 30 hours a week, resulting in a reduce in energy expenditure of 1573 calories per week.
American mothers see more TV and get less mortal activity today than mothers did four decades ago, a green study finds. "With each passing generation, mothers have become increasingly physically inactive, desk-bound and obese, thereby potentially predisposing children to an increased risk of inactivity, adiposity body stoutness and chronic non-communicable diseases," said study leader Edward Archer, an perturb scientist and epidemiologist at the University of South Carolina. "Given that physical activity is an undiluted prerequisite for health and wellness, it is not surprising that inactivity is now a leading cause of death and disease in developed nations," Archer eminent in a university news release.
The analysis of 45 years of national material focused on two groups of mothers: those with children 5 years or younger, and those with children grey 6 to 18. The researchers assessed physical activity related to cooking, cleaning and exercising. From 1965 to 2010, the undistinguished amount of physical activity among mothers with younger children knock from 44 hours to less than 30 hours a week, resulting in a reduce in energy expenditure of 1573 calories per week.
Saturday 17 March 2018
Victims Of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Can Often Be Saved By Therapeutic Hypothermia
Victims Of Sudden Cardiac Arrest Can Often Be Saved By Therapeutic Hypothermia.
For ladies and gentlemen broken-hearted with sudden cardiac arrest, doctors often reserve to a brain-protecting "cooling" of the body, a procedure called therapeutic hypothermia. But unripe research suggests that physicians are often too quick to terminate potentially lifesaving supportive care when these patients' brains meet with disaster to "re-awaken" after a standard waiting period of three days. The inquiry suggests that these patients may need care for up to a week before they regain neurological alertness.
And "Most patients receiving requirement care - without hypothermia - will be neurologically awake by day 3 if they are waking up," explained the clue author of one study, Dr Shaker M Eid, an deputy professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. However, in his team's study, "patients treated with hypothermia took five to seven days to aftermath up". The results of Eid's memorize and two others on therapeutic hypothermia were scheduled to be presented Saturday during the session of the American Heart Association in Chicago.
For over 25 years, the prognosis for revival from cardiac arrest and the decision to withdraw care has been based on a neurological exam conducted 72 hours after primary treatment with hypothermia, Eid pointed out. The new findings may formulation doubt on the wisdom of that approach.
For the Johns Hopkins report, Eid and colleagues premeditated 47 patients who survived cardiac arrest - a sudden loss of heart function, often tied to underlying pity disease. Fifteen patients were treated with hypothermia and seven of those patients survived to infirmary discharge. Of the 32 patients that did not receive hypothermia therapy, 13 survived to discharge.
Within three days, 38,5 percent of patients receiving regular misery were alert again, with only mild mental deficits. However, at three days none of the hypothermia-treated patients were nimble and conscious.
But things were different at the seven-day mark: At that point, 33 percent of hypothermia-treated patients were signal and had only mild deficits. And by the time of their hospital discharge, 83 percent of the hypothermia-treated patients were advise and had only mild deficits, the researchers found. "Our details are preliminary, provocative but not robust enough to prompt change in clinical practice," Eid stated.
For ladies and gentlemen broken-hearted with sudden cardiac arrest, doctors often reserve to a brain-protecting "cooling" of the body, a procedure called therapeutic hypothermia. But unripe research suggests that physicians are often too quick to terminate potentially lifesaving supportive care when these patients' brains meet with disaster to "re-awaken" after a standard waiting period of three days. The inquiry suggests that these patients may need care for up to a week before they regain neurological alertness.
And "Most patients receiving requirement care - without hypothermia - will be neurologically awake by day 3 if they are waking up," explained the clue author of one study, Dr Shaker M Eid, an deputy professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. However, in his team's study, "patients treated with hypothermia took five to seven days to aftermath up". The results of Eid's memorize and two others on therapeutic hypothermia were scheduled to be presented Saturday during the session of the American Heart Association in Chicago.
For over 25 years, the prognosis for revival from cardiac arrest and the decision to withdraw care has been based on a neurological exam conducted 72 hours after primary treatment with hypothermia, Eid pointed out. The new findings may formulation doubt on the wisdom of that approach.
For the Johns Hopkins report, Eid and colleagues premeditated 47 patients who survived cardiac arrest - a sudden loss of heart function, often tied to underlying pity disease. Fifteen patients were treated with hypothermia and seven of those patients survived to infirmary discharge. Of the 32 patients that did not receive hypothermia therapy, 13 survived to discharge.
Within three days, 38,5 percent of patients receiving regular misery were alert again, with only mild mental deficits. However, at three days none of the hypothermia-treated patients were nimble and conscious.
But things were different at the seven-day mark: At that point, 33 percent of hypothermia-treated patients were signal and had only mild deficits. And by the time of their hospital discharge, 83 percent of the hypothermia-treated patients were advise and had only mild deficits, the researchers found. "Our details are preliminary, provocative but not robust enough to prompt change in clinical practice," Eid stated.
Sunday 9 July 2017
Taking Clot-Busting Drug Immediately After A Stroke Within A Few Hours Improves The Patient's Condition
Taking Clot-Busting Drug Immediately After A Stroke Within A Few Hours Improves The Patient's Condition.
Patients who get the clot-busting cure alteplase (tPA) within 4,5 hours of having a jot along better than patients who are given the drug later, Scottish doctors report. It has been known that treating a blow earlier is better than later, but this study shows for the initial time that there is significant harm done with starting tPA after 4,5 hours, the researchers noted. "The service of giving this treatment for stroke continues if we start it as late as 4,5 hours," said restraint researcher Dr Kennedy R Lees, from the University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics of the Gardiner Institute at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow.
So "There is no after deductions benefit to patients if you start the therapy after 4,5 hours. But if you start treatment after 4,5 hours, you will have more patients who die. Starting at an hour is much better than starting at two hours, and that's better than three hours, and that's better than 4,5 hours".
The sake derived from near the start tPA treatment is a long-term benefit, Lees pointed out. "It's a help that we can measure three months later. So, what we are getting is long-term improved function. They are more indubitably to have no symptoms and more likely, if they do have symptoms, to be able to do things for themselves, or need less help. A well range of disability is reduced, by just starting tPA a few minutes earlier".
The report is published in the May 15 delivery of The Lancet. For the study, the research team poised data on 3670 patients in eight trials that investigated how the benefits and risks of tPA changed based on the term the drug was given after the onset of a stroke.
Patients who get the clot-busting cure alteplase (tPA) within 4,5 hours of having a jot along better than patients who are given the drug later, Scottish doctors report. It has been known that treating a blow earlier is better than later, but this study shows for the initial time that there is significant harm done with starting tPA after 4,5 hours, the researchers noted. "The service of giving this treatment for stroke continues if we start it as late as 4,5 hours," said restraint researcher Dr Kennedy R Lees, from the University Department of Medicine and Therapeutics of the Gardiner Institute at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow.
So "There is no after deductions benefit to patients if you start the therapy after 4,5 hours. But if you start treatment after 4,5 hours, you will have more patients who die. Starting at an hour is much better than starting at two hours, and that's better than three hours, and that's better than 4,5 hours".
The sake derived from near the start tPA treatment is a long-term benefit, Lees pointed out. "It's a help that we can measure three months later. So, what we are getting is long-term improved function. They are more indubitably to have no symptoms and more likely, if they do have symptoms, to be able to do things for themselves, or need less help. A well range of disability is reduced, by just starting tPA a few minutes earlier".
The report is published in the May 15 delivery of The Lancet. For the study, the research team poised data on 3670 patients in eight trials that investigated how the benefits and risks of tPA changed based on the term the drug was given after the onset of a stroke.
Friday 8 July 2016
Children Watch Television Instead Of Games If Obese Mothers
Children Watch Television Instead Of Games If Obese Mothers.
Many babies lay out almost three hours in bearing of the TV each day, a new contemplate finds, especially if their mothers are obese and TV addicts themselves, or if the babies are fussy or active. "Mothers are using small screen as a way to soothe these infants who might be a little bit more difficult to deal with," said superior study author Amanda Thompson, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of North Carolina, in Chapel Hill. Other studies have shown that TV watching at such an at age can be harmful adding that TV can obstruct important developmental milestones.
The report was published online Jan 7, 2013 and in the February imprint issue of the journal Pediatrics. For the study, Thompson's span looked at more than 200 pairs of low-income black mothers and babies who took part in a consider on obesity risk in infants, for which families were observed in their homes. Researchers found infants as young as 3 months were parked in frontage of the TV for almost three hours a day.
And 40 percent of infants were exposed to TV at least three hours a date by the time they were 1 year old. Mothers who were obese, who watched a lot of TV and whose lassie was fussy were most likely to put their infants in front of the TV, Thompson's league found. TV viewing continued through mealtime for many infants, the researchers found.
Mothers with more training were less likely to keep the TV on during meals. Obese mothers are more likely to be inactive or admit from depression. "They are more likely to use the television themselves, so their infants are exposed to more television as well". Thompson is currently doing a swot to see if play and other alternatives can help these moms get their babies away from the television.
Many babies lay out almost three hours in bearing of the TV each day, a new contemplate finds, especially if their mothers are obese and TV addicts themselves, or if the babies are fussy or active. "Mothers are using small screen as a way to soothe these infants who might be a little bit more difficult to deal with," said superior study author Amanda Thompson, assistant professor of anthropology at the University of North Carolina, in Chapel Hill. Other studies have shown that TV watching at such an at age can be harmful adding that TV can obstruct important developmental milestones.
The report was published online Jan 7, 2013 and in the February imprint issue of the journal Pediatrics. For the study, Thompson's span looked at more than 200 pairs of low-income black mothers and babies who took part in a consider on obesity risk in infants, for which families were observed in their homes. Researchers found infants as young as 3 months were parked in frontage of the TV for almost three hours a day.
And 40 percent of infants were exposed to TV at least three hours a date by the time they were 1 year old. Mothers who were obese, who watched a lot of TV and whose lassie was fussy were most likely to put their infants in front of the TV, Thompson's league found. TV viewing continued through mealtime for many infants, the researchers found.
Mothers with more training were less likely to keep the TV on during meals. Obese mothers are more likely to be inactive or admit from depression. "They are more likely to use the television themselves, so their infants are exposed to more television as well". Thompson is currently doing a swot to see if play and other alternatives can help these moms get their babies away from the television.
Friday 15 April 2016
Dialysis Six Times A Week For Some Patients Better Than Three
Dialysis Six Times A Week For Some Patients Better Than Three.
Kidney collapse patients who treacherous the number of weekly dialysis treatments typically prescribed had significantly better determination function, overall health and general quality of life, new examination indicates. The finding stems from an analysis that compared the impact of the 40-year-old standard of punctiliousness - three dialysis treatments per week, for three to four hours per sitting - with a six-day a week treatment regimen involving sessions of 2,5 to three hours per session. Launched in 2006, the contrasting involved 245 dialysis patients assigned to either a pier dialysis schedule or the high-frequency option. All participants underwent MRIs to assess fundamentals muscle structure, and all completed quality-of-life surveys.
In addition to improved cardiovascular trim and overall health, the analysis further revealed that two concerns faced by most kidney failure patients - blood constraint and phosphate level control - also fared better under the more frequent healing program. Dr Glenn Chertow, chief of the nephrology division at Stanford University School of Medicine, reports his team's observations in the Nov 20, 2010 online print run of the New England Journal of Medicine, to equal with a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology in Denver.
And "Kidneys handiwork seven days a week, 24 hours a day," Chertow famous in a Stanford University news release. "You could imagine why people might feel better if dialysis were to more closely feigned kidney function. But you have to factor in the burden of additional sessions, the associate and the cost".
Kidney collapse patients who treacherous the number of weekly dialysis treatments typically prescribed had significantly better determination function, overall health and general quality of life, new examination indicates. The finding stems from an analysis that compared the impact of the 40-year-old standard of punctiliousness - three dialysis treatments per week, for three to four hours per sitting - with a six-day a week treatment regimen involving sessions of 2,5 to three hours per session. Launched in 2006, the contrasting involved 245 dialysis patients assigned to either a pier dialysis schedule or the high-frequency option. All participants underwent MRIs to assess fundamentals muscle structure, and all completed quality-of-life surveys.
In addition to improved cardiovascular trim and overall health, the analysis further revealed that two concerns faced by most kidney failure patients - blood constraint and phosphate level control - also fared better under the more frequent healing program. Dr Glenn Chertow, chief of the nephrology division at Stanford University School of Medicine, reports his team's observations in the Nov 20, 2010 online print run of the New England Journal of Medicine, to equal with a presentation at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology in Denver.
And "Kidneys handiwork seven days a week, 24 hours a day," Chertow famous in a Stanford University news release. "You could imagine why people might feel better if dialysis were to more closely feigned kidney function. But you have to factor in the burden of additional sessions, the associate and the cost".
Thursday 10 March 2016
In Illinois, Transportation Of Patients Did Not Fit Into The Designated Period Of Time
In Illinois, Transportation Of Patients Did Not Fit Into The Designated Period Of Time.
Most trauma patients transferred between facilities in the affirm of Illinois don't convert it to their irrefutable destination within the two hours mandated by the state. But the most strictly injured patients did make it within the time window, suggesting that physicians are fittingly triaging patients, according to a study in the December issue of the Archives of Surgery. "If you didn't get there within two hours, it definitely didn't make any difference in markers of severity," said study co-author Dr Thomas J Esposito, foremost of the division of trauma, surgical critical guardianship and burns in the department of surgery at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine in Maywood, Ill. "If radical to their own devices, doctors may not need onerous advice on what to do".
And "The directive is iffy and - probably doesn't matter in that the sickest people are being recognized and transferred more quickly," added Dr Mark Gestring, medical governor of the Strong Regional Trauma Center at the University of Rochester Medical Center. "The organize is driven by how odd the patients are, and the truly sick patients are making the trip in enough time".
In fact, Esposito stated, there may be a downside to having such a rule. "It sets up a kettle of fish in that someone can say you were assumed to get my loved one or my client here in two hours and that didn't happen - I'm looking for some compensation because you were out of compliance". And it may even bowl over trauma centers with patients that don't really need to be there.
When patients are injured, they may not be near a clinic or trauma center that can help them, so are treated initially either at a local hospital, by pinch medical technicians or both. "That first hospital can't finish the job, then the lenient needs to move on after life-threatening conditions are dealt with". After patients are stabilized, they can be moved to another masterliness which has, for example, a neurosurgeon to deal with that particular injury.
Most trauma patients transferred between facilities in the affirm of Illinois don't convert it to their irrefutable destination within the two hours mandated by the state. But the most strictly injured patients did make it within the time window, suggesting that physicians are fittingly triaging patients, according to a study in the December issue of the Archives of Surgery. "If you didn't get there within two hours, it definitely didn't make any difference in markers of severity," said study co-author Dr Thomas J Esposito, foremost of the division of trauma, surgical critical guardianship and burns in the department of surgery at Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine in Maywood, Ill. "If radical to their own devices, doctors may not need onerous advice on what to do".
And "The directive is iffy and - probably doesn't matter in that the sickest people are being recognized and transferred more quickly," added Dr Mark Gestring, medical governor of the Strong Regional Trauma Center at the University of Rochester Medical Center. "The organize is driven by how odd the patients are, and the truly sick patients are making the trip in enough time".
In fact, Esposito stated, there may be a downside to having such a rule. "It sets up a kettle of fish in that someone can say you were assumed to get my loved one or my client here in two hours and that didn't happen - I'm looking for some compensation because you were out of compliance". And it may even bowl over trauma centers with patients that don't really need to be there.
When patients are injured, they may not be near a clinic or trauma center that can help them, so are treated initially either at a local hospital, by pinch medical technicians or both. "That first hospital can't finish the job, then the lenient needs to move on after life-threatening conditions are dealt with". After patients are stabilized, they can be moved to another masterliness which has, for example, a neurosurgeon to deal with that particular injury.
Tuesday 9 June 2015
Physical Inactivity Has Lot Of Negative Effects
Physical Inactivity Has Lot Of Negative Effects.
Regular harass doesn't rub the higher risk of serious illness or premature death that comes from sitting too much each day, a reborn review reveals. Combing through 47 prior studies, Canadian researchers found that prolonged habitually sitting was linked to significantly higher odds of heart disease, diabetes, cancer and dying. And even if den participants exercised regularly, the accumulated evidence still showed worse vigour outcomes for those who sat for long periods, the researchers said. However, those who did little or no exercise faced even higher form risks.
And "We found the association relatively consistent across all diseases. A good-looking strong case can be made that sedentary behavior and sitting is probably linked with these diseases," said learn author Aviroop Biswas, a PhD candidate at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network. "When we're standing, firm muscles in our body are working very hard to guard us upright," added Biswas, offering one theory about why sitting is detrimental.
And "Once we sit for a want time our metabolism is not as functional, and the inactivity is associated with a lot of negative effects". The research is published Jan 19, 2015 in the online emanation of Annals of Internal Medicine. About 3,2 million proletariat die each year because they are not active enough, according to the World Health Organization, making corporal inactivity the fourth leading risk factor for mortality worldwide.
Regular harass doesn't rub the higher risk of serious illness or premature death that comes from sitting too much each day, a reborn review reveals. Combing through 47 prior studies, Canadian researchers found that prolonged habitually sitting was linked to significantly higher odds of heart disease, diabetes, cancer and dying. And even if den participants exercised regularly, the accumulated evidence still showed worse vigour outcomes for those who sat for long periods, the researchers said. However, those who did little or no exercise faced even higher form risks.
And "We found the association relatively consistent across all diseases. A good-looking strong case can be made that sedentary behavior and sitting is probably linked with these diseases," said learn author Aviroop Biswas, a PhD candidate at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network. "When we're standing, firm muscles in our body are working very hard to guard us upright," added Biswas, offering one theory about why sitting is detrimental.
And "Once we sit for a want time our metabolism is not as functional, and the inactivity is associated with a lot of negative effects". The research is published Jan 19, 2015 in the online emanation of Annals of Internal Medicine. About 3,2 million proletariat die each year because they are not active enough, according to the World Health Organization, making corporal inactivity the fourth leading risk factor for mortality worldwide.
Monday 28 October 2013
How Useful Is Switching To Daylight Saving Time
How Useful Is Switching To Daylight Saving Time.
Not turning the clocks back an hour in the conquered would present a stark way to improve people's healthfulness and well-being, according to an English expert. Keeping the time the same would increase the include of "accessible" daylight hours during the fall and winter and encourage more out of doors physical activity, according to Mayer Hillman, a senior partner emeritus at the Policy Studies Institute in London vito viga. He estimated that eliminating the occasion change would provide "about 300 additional hours of full view for adults each year and 200 more for children".
Previous digging has shown that people feel happier, more energetic and have lower rates of disease in the longer and brighter days of summer, while people's moods lean to decline during the shorter, duller days of winter, Hillman explained in his report, published online Oct 29, 2010 in BMJ. This draft "is an effective, judicious and remarkably beyond managed way of achieving a better alignment of our waking hours with the present daylight during the year," he pointed out in a statement release from the journal's publisher.
Another expert, Dr Robert E Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, said that he unconditionally agrees with Hillman's conclusions. "Lessons accomplished by the fit of research on the benefits of vitamin D count up to the argument for 'not putting the clocks back.' Basic biochemistry has proved to us that sunlight helps your body transmute a construction of cholesterol that is present in your skin into vitamin D Additionally, several epidemiological studies have documented the seasonality of concavity and other mood disorders," Graham stated.
Not turning the clocks back an hour in the conquered would present a stark way to improve people's healthfulness and well-being, according to an English expert. Keeping the time the same would increase the include of "accessible" daylight hours during the fall and winter and encourage more out of doors physical activity, according to Mayer Hillman, a senior partner emeritus at the Policy Studies Institute in London vito viga. He estimated that eliminating the occasion change would provide "about 300 additional hours of full view for adults each year and 200 more for children".
Previous digging has shown that people feel happier, more energetic and have lower rates of disease in the longer and brighter days of summer, while people's moods lean to decline during the shorter, duller days of winter, Hillman explained in his report, published online Oct 29, 2010 in BMJ. This draft "is an effective, judicious and remarkably beyond managed way of achieving a better alignment of our waking hours with the present daylight during the year," he pointed out in a statement release from the journal's publisher.
Another expert, Dr Robert E Graham, an internist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, said that he unconditionally agrees with Hillman's conclusions. "Lessons accomplished by the fit of research on the benefits of vitamin D count up to the argument for 'not putting the clocks back.' Basic biochemistry has proved to us that sunlight helps your body transmute a construction of cholesterol that is present in your skin into vitamin D Additionally, several epidemiological studies have documented the seasonality of concavity and other mood disorders," Graham stated.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)